Horrific ONS death figures, new analysis.
So, as Iâve said before John Campbell has come a little late to the party, evn though he he still cannot say itâs murder, intentional, planned etc. That said, good find @Rich and overall a good video Iâ considering sending to all my ex-friends!
Youâve got to admire his deadpan âWe know itâs not the vaccineâ - probably enough to fool the thin chequers of Youtube while ausuing his regulars.
Youâre probably right though - âinâ irony may not be enough.
As an aside: Looked for JCâs source link âons figures vaccinated annus horribilusâ on google-based Duckduckgo - not coming up, even when you know itâs there. Worse than google.
The ONS link itself comes up - they havenât got round to censoring the data from official sources yet. Probably working with ONS on gettting a thinned out version for the publicâŚ
Yandex browser showed it at the top.
Actually I canât see how this data is obtained. The Substacker (referred to as Nobody by JC) says he amalgamates death rates by vaccination status (vaccinated, ONS table) and a derived data set for the unvaccinated. It looks as though the latter is based on calculations using âvaccine uptakeâ data. If so the difference could arise from the unvaccinated population being different from the one used by the ONS when it does the rates per 100,000 person-years*. This ONS production doesnât produce damning figures for the vaccine (Norman Fenton has documented the doubts, biases, flaws and even frauds in this data) and the new data uses an âunvaccinatedâ population that is different.
Not that I think the conclusion is wrong but the âExposeâ style of the âNobodyâ substacker, mixing in his own âdone dealâ graphs into main the argument (couched in damning claims and capital letters) thus detaching us from the raw data and wondering what heâs done, isnât conducive for checking.
*You can download the spreadsheet,
Table 3
This is the untrustworthy data complained about by Fenton. Mr âNobodyâ has derived different figures for the unvaccinated, which may well be correct but the difficulty with nailing down the unvaccinated population will continue to muddy the waters.
Excess deaths is the way to go IMHOâŚ
Replying to my casual self.
âExcess deaths is the way to go IMHOâŚâ
Excess Deaths is also the way almost no-one is going - no-one in power anyway.
It has been the focus of discussion here before, mostly as an indicator of vaccine deaths. At the time it was more the dog that hadnât barked yet - if vaccines were as harmful as claimed, where were the deaths?
Time has moved on and we have been seeing them.
So I thought Iâd group the previous more recent threads on excess deaths here.
This was Europe and the west.
Ed Dowd spotted the steep rise in PIP (UK) disability claims:
Far from the first time Iâve been alerted to UK problem via UK data, by US analysts.
Germany and Japan
England and Wales data
Includes this John Campbell video posted by @Rich: https://forum.5filters.info/uploads/default/original/2X/0/09b6e835f8c5955b02d75b8a322a8d5f062708bf.jpeg
Excess deaths has been a bee in the bonnet of Denis Rancourt long before the data became obvious.
Whatâs remarkable is that the extent of these deaths (10%+ above expected for many months, all over the developed west), ie a âBlack Swanâ event (like, ten sigma in âunlikelinessâ) has not triggered any inquisitiveness in the mainstream - including amongst all our politicians who claim our health is their priority.
Or academia apparently.
I agree that excess deaths are the measure to look at first, btw.
If it looks like a cull, walks like a cull and quacks like a cullâŚ
Itâs probably a coincidence
Of course. Here is Pandemic News just reminding us what that dark, dark, anonymous website Deagle had to say. And of course their predictions on global de-population (for the f*** chuckers, I meant population but predictive text wonât allow it) matching what looks like our future is going to be.