Kevin McKernan’s discovery of bacterial DNA contamination in the mRNA shots (discussed here in a post by @CJ1) has been confirmed by Dr. Phillip Buckhaults who also runs a lab in South Carolina.
He lucidly explains to the senate committee.
Buckhaults is no ‘anti-vaxxer’, or ‘conspiracy theorist’, by any stretch. The vaccines were a good thing, he says, in answer to the covid challenge (never heard of hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, and the rest, apparently).
He only says the problem of the DNA contamination has to be fixed. He wouldn’t take the shot now, but he would still give it to his elderly parents, but not his children - because of long term DNA change from the DNA present, a risk he now rates as real.
He also puts it down to incompetence. Says it raises regulatory issues. Well, you don’t say!
It’s pretty clear this discovery is real. He is being generous, a bit canny as he is well aware of the politics at stake.
IMO he could hardly have said less. The Expose were less forgiving: https://expose-news.com/2023/09/19/200-billion-pieces-of-dna-in-a-single-dose/
The manufacturing process by which the mRNA vaccines were made that were given in the trials did not have this contamination problem.
The problem arose with the scaling up for world scale manufacturing. This necessitated the use of bacteria.
So what the regulators, no doubt all on melatonin to get a good sleep during the day, passed for public consumption was not what the public recieved.
To be clear, the risk of DNA alterations seems now upped by a few of orders of magnitude. Buckhaults himself explains that he and his own scientists see this DNA-alteration in their own lab in other contexts. Once it’s altered, it’s altered - in your DNA and that of your subsequent progeny.
DNA Contamination Confirmed
SC Senate Hearing - USC Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults. Around mid September 2023
I recommend this 1/2 hour video as it’s understandable.
The interaction with the politicians is also riveting, I thought. They didn’t want their DNA altered 
.
For more of the implications, here’s Dr Cremola who featured the video in his latest article.
Extract below. If you haven’t had enough, there are more concerns covered in this article, like the SV40 cancer-promoter . The hyperlink is permanent.
ED
…University of South Carolina professor Phillip Buckhaults has since confirmed the presence of dsDNA in the COVID shots. September 13, 2023, he testified10 to this before the South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC).
Buckhaults is a molecular biologist and cancer geneticist with extensive experience in DNA sequencing, and initially set out to debunk McKernan’s claims. To his shock, he replicated McKernan’s findings instead.
In his testimony, he explained how these DNA contaminants can integrate into your genome and disrupt the function of other genes, either long term or permanently, and may be passed on to offspring for generations.
He told the senators he was “alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine,” as “there is a very real hazard” of the dsDNA integrating into a person’s genome and becoming a “permanent fixture of the cell” that can result in autoimmune problems and cancers.11
Buckhaults suspects high levels of DNA contaminants may also be causing some of the more serious side effects of the jabs, such as lethal cardiac arrest.12 Of the two lots he analyzed, he found between 5 nanograms and 20 ng of plasmid DNA — ranging from one to 200 base pairs long — per 300 microliter dose, and he points out that having a multitude of tiny fragments is far riskier than having one big piece of DNA.13
The risk of genome integration by dsDNA has been known for decades,14 so the individuals who decided to allow this contamination to remain cannot claim they didn’t know public health would be put at risk.
Buckhaults stressed that we need to collect and analyze DNA from various tissues of those who have received the COVID jabs — at least a few hundred people — to determine whether genomic integration is taking place, and what changes are occurring.
He also explained how the DNA contamination occurred in the first place. In summary, the products used during the clinical trials and the commercial products were not made in the identical way. The commercial product grew the modified RNA using a mix of DNA plasmid and E. coli, and the DNA were not properly filtered out — a clear sign of poor manufacturing processes.
{For refs see file, wouldn’t paste.}
