Dynamite? Dr John Campbell: Viral Vaccine paper

[Rich]

Part 1: Viral Vaccine paper

Viral Vaccine paper

16 mins

Part 2: Viral vaccine paper with Dr Vibeke Manniche

Viral vaccine paper, Dr Vibeke Manniche

37 mins

BTL comment below by former Pfizer employee from Part 1 which alone has over 70 comments!

Hi Dr. John, I’m a former Pfizer employee who specialised in manufacturing investigations. I was one of the first vaccinated in early 2021. However, I was very hesitant to do so as I know how viral pandemics play out and that vaccinating against a virus like this was futile and the MRNA technology was untested. I finally decided to get the vaccine as I didn’t want my family to receive it and thought if there was a bad reaction, I would experience it myself and give early warnings. At the time as I said, I was working on production investigations, so I dug into the open investigations on the network. (Pfizer had introduced a networked investigation system called Sherlock around that time and I was granted access to the reams of data in the form of manufacturing deviations and customer complaints.) I looked into the two batches that I had recieved and later in the year looked into the batches my partner had received, there were deviations for filter integrity failures that were passed and deemed safe. I am aware of several people that work for Pfizer that received the vaccines on the same day as me and had to be taken away by ambulance. In the early stages it was routine to undergo a monitoring period of 20 minutes post vaccine with a paramedic. Anyways I’ve since left Pfizer as I can no longer tolerate the justifications and ethics of these companies. I personally believe the regulators need a serious reform too before we can even start truly investigating the misdeeds of big pharma.

[Evvy_dense]

This confirms that the number of vaccine reactions reported to authorities in many countries etc is not some fad of (somehow) recently converted vaxed but anti-vaxer people.

JC asks: Why has this not been done before now by the regulatory authorities in Europe, UK, US, Canada.
“I’ve been recording batch numbers for 40 years. The whole point of having batch numbers is that this can be done.”

Indeed. Impossible to imagine that ‘they didn’t know’. Indeed this has already surfaced in informal analyses, in the US I think.

John is outraged at the authorities ‘letting us down’.
But the large number of adverse reactions - the ones counted in this study in Denmark, and in the USA by VAERS and by the MHRA in the UK - has been public knowledge all along.
It’s their JOB to ‘let us down’.

What’s the explanation?

An obvious possibility is that the product changed in some way between batches? The storage temp was reduced at some point, it’s noted by the researcher. Maybe Pfizer found some problem and fixed it on the sly.
If this was the problem routine monitoring (that would be an urgent necessity following a change) would/should have flagged it; batches could be recalled to limit damage, but this was never done.

Another possibility is that the reporting systems are now being fiddled with before the problems are picked up? I’ve read the CDC actively does this already. Possibly in some areas the fidlding isn’t happening.

I guess to help get to the bottom of this, the scrutiny needs to extend to other regions of the world.

In the second video John and one of the authors disuss the data.

“If I’d known I would have got the yellow one!”

Erm…

Well what can be said for sure at the moment?

My suggestion:

1. The manufacturers are shown to be beyond untrustworthy.

Some of us er…suspected this already ; but it’s not acknowledged by the pushers-in-power.

2. The regulatory authorities have been AWOL, and it is deliberate.

3. The researchers report extreme difficulty getting their study published - JAMA, NEJM, LANCET etc, knocked it back, and didn’t even send it for peer review.
   The proverbial hot potato.
   So another branch of the widespread corruption is revealed.

Yet it is basically scientific fact.

4 And then there’s the media. There’s no way that people in the media have not come across any of the more informal claims about injuries varying by batch that have been made.

Thanks for posting Rich.

[PatB]

@Evvy_dense

Indeed. Impossible to imagine that ‘they didn’t know’. Indeed this has already surfaced in informal analyses, in the US I think.

One has go to love those reporting ‘news’ except it’s not not news. As you said @Evvy_dense , in the US, detailed analysis of states and batch numbers made it almost impossible to believe it was not deliberate.

Here is a post from January LAST year.

These findings in particlar have immense legal repercussions - Reiner Fuellmich

This is a poor quality video of Reiner Fuellmich, Vivianne Fischer, Wolfgand Wodard, and a guy from the UK whom I do not recognise.They are going over the analysis of the VAERS data showing that some batches of the jab are more dangerous than others (posted here). Except now, a more detailed analysis, shows that not only are specific batches of the jab more dangerous, but this highlights two additional aspects to this. First, almost all adverse events can be attributed to a limited number of ba…

It’s always good to highlight these sorts of things @Rich but Dr John reporting the news? Tell him to flipping swallow that red pill.

A late edit for @Evvy_dense . It was not Pfizer. In the US, the data was similar for all the jab suppliers and the timings made it look like they had colluded on the release of the bad batches.

[Evvy_dense]

Agree PatB.
Until it becomes a ‘study’ (conferring a kind of middle class respectability) as opposed to some supposedly oik-addition that does exactly the same thing, cautious individuals won’t touch it. Fear of guilt by association I guess, coupled with the power and reach of the smearing forces.
But at least this study now removes that excuse. So no reason why it shouldn’t be on the BBC primetime news by tea-time
Unless they are pre-occupied by another story… :

[CJ1]

Fascinating stuff which was picked up early on - The expose publicised the Fuellmich Yeadon interview mentioned by @PatB above.

But there’s also this showing Pfizer changed to a second process during the trials - 27 mins in:

The Origin Story of Pfizer's "Crime Against Humanity" - Dr. Naomi Wolf and...

cheers

[Evvy_dense]

Thanks @CJ1. Had a quick look at your jump-in point. Yes, as you say Pfizer made a change. Dr Flowers points at this CHD article which gives some more.

‘Bombshell’ Study of Pfizer COVID Vaccine Suggests Some People Got Highly...

Interesting suggestion I hadn’t thought of - it was known there werre a high number of reactions, so placebos were introduced to reduce the overall figures.

The regulators do some quality control testing - but didn’t test the placebos. Fishy; if that was to save time, it’s a rookie error! Also of course it means the regulators knew about batch problems and didn’t let on.

This suggestion has credibility - why should one group of vaccines have zero side effects? That would be unheard of in covid vaccines, if they were all uniformly…uniform

Going to spend some time with nature - watching the rest of the Wolf and Flowers video

Cheers

[CJ1]

Hi @Evvy_dense , I don’t think the CHD article above relates to the Process1 and Process 2 point raised by Flowers, in the interview he points to the second process, P2, as being twice as harmful as P1. I found one CHD interview with Josh Guetzkow which covers it in detail and is directly on the point of the two processes:

Bait-and-Switch With Josh Guetzkow

• JG makes the point that process 2 is a totally different method of producing MRNA that goes in the vaccine LNP - BUT this was only tested on 250 people in their trials in late 2020 early 2021 and it turns out process 2 is the one Pfizer adopted for the world as it was far cheaper to produce MRNA than Process 1 ( Process 1 was tested on 40,000 people! ) - hence the name of the interview “Bait and Switch” - test P1 on 40,000 to get it through the Regulatory doors but then sell vaccines made by P2 even though it was only tested on 250 people! And the side effects of P2 were 2.7 times those under P1 when looking at the trial data recently released under court orders by Pfizer.

cheers

[PatB]

Thanks for the video @CJ1 . I hadn’t seen that one. This thread, plus the latest Lancet pulling a pre-print study within 24 hours says only one thing to me. It’s this.

Send the #*&%’+~ to jail. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200. Don’t even bother with a trial.

As I keep telling my friends and I think I’ve said it before here, I’m looking forward to the return of the guillotine. After Nuremberg 2, as the heads roll into the baskets, I’ll be standing on the ramparts cheering.

[CJ1]

@PatB

After Nuremberg 2, as the heads roll into the baskets, I’ll be standing on the ramparts cheering.

Is this custom about to make a comeback in your part of France?

cheers

[Evvy_dense]

Hi CJ

“Hi @Evvy_dense , I don’t think the CHD article above relates to the Process1 and Process 2 point raised by Flowers, in the interview he points to the second process, P2, as being twice as harmful as P1. I found one CHD interview with Josh Guetzkow which covers it in detail and is directly on the point of the two processes:”

You’re right CJ1. And you’ve summed it up accurately. That’s the main take-home of the first part of the video. Apart from that, they struggle a bit to create other take-homes (other than the useful indications of trial fraud), with the trial obviously being a criminal dogs breakfast but some key issues unresolved.
Guetskow says he’ll be writing it up soon in his substack (called Jackanapes). I guess with the ongoing scrutiny of the Pfizer documents and the forensics of people like Guetskow and Naomi Klein’s [Edit: Correction, that would be Naomi Wolf*!] team it’s only a matter of time before the details emerge.

In the second half of the video, Dr Paul Thomas - who as you likely know, as a GP conducted a study on his vaccinated vs unvaccinated children, found the vaxed ones had worse health and worse immune systems, then was struck off - discusses his new book about his experience with vaccines.
He says he’s seen literally hundreds of parents, in his surgery, tearfully relating how their child quickly regressed literally before their eyes, following a vaccine.

Cheers

*Maybe I’ll get a stern letter from Klein, who dislikes being confused with Naomi Wolf so much that she’s written a book about it

Naomi Klein investigates ‘conspiracy theory culture’ that has shaken her life

Naomi Klein investigates ‘conspiracy theory culture’ that has shaken her life

*Naomi Klein’s environmentalism has evolved under the malign influence of Trump - to such an extent that the Biden administration gets close to a free pass. OTOH because of her campaigning zeal on matters covid, Wolf finds herself closer to Trump supporters than (I imagine) that she would want.

Someone should host the two Doppelgangers together.

[Evvy_dense]

Josh Guertskow, who featured in @CJ1 's video above, has made some telling revelations.

The Pfizer Clinical Trial in Argentina Was a Military Operation

And Augusto has the contracts to prove it

The Pfizer Clinical Trial in Argentina Was a Military Operation

Also true of the US - I remember Sasha Latypov gave a talk in which she showed the vaccine contracts were all given to defense companies.