Hi folks, I picked up this link from Dr Sam Bailey’s recent release:
The whole paper is a valid rebuttal of the current official story. It needs close study but the fundamental point is that this “virus” has not been found in nature or isolated from any living person but is a man-made construct. The vaccine “solution” has now been examined by pathologists in Germany and found to be highly toxic, this is the subject of this article: https://rivercitymalone.com/health/pathologists-investigate-deaths-after-covid-vaccination/
Patrick Henningsen clarified something in the UKC news of Friday 12 Nov which I had been wondering about for a long time.
When the vaccines were announced there was much talk about how the Pfizer jab needed specialist storage at very low temperature. Minus 70 c iirc. That narrative seemed to fade away, though possibly there was a follow up explanation saying that storage at higher temperatures, that ordinary refrigeration can sustain, was okay for shorter periods. Which seems plausible enough prima facie.
BUT, according to Patrick, the formula was changed subsequent to the trials, for all their possible shortcomings, to enable easier storage, and that the EUA (itself only feasible by suppressing alternative valid treatments) did not even apply to that version, only to the -70c version. If this is correct it is a pretty big piece of the jigsaw.
When I’ve more time I’ll try to follow this up, as well as reading Sam Bailey’s article, natch.
Hi @KarenEliot , thanks for that spot - it fits with the suggestion that “vaccines” are not universal formulas even from the same pharma stable - if they know the lethality of some doses then, to avoid an initial super-storm of side effects, they will need to provide doses closer to placebos for large tranches of jabees. Adjustments for easier handling will achieve this without any oversight.
The 2 links I provide above are connected to this - the main 50 page pdf is in fact research by Dr MARK Bailey and Dr. John Bevan-Smith( PhD not MD) which admittedly follows the Virus Mania script in general. The pdf’s first sub-link is to the German Pathology review showing the horrific contents of deceased jabbed and autopsied bodies. In fact their conclusions match the findings of Dr Carrie Madej : https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/09/dr-carrie-madej-first-u-s-lab-examines-vaccine-vials-horrific-findings-revealed/
My bad (the wrong Bailey, that is). still not read the article I’m afraid - been a full day - but did pick this up when starting to probe the altered formulation.
I offer no opinion on plausibility or otherwise but it does cover the storage issue, stating long term storage should be at -130f - -70f (not Celsius). Converted to degrees Celsius that’s -90c to -57. This applies to the kiddy version too, but that has a lower proportion of mRNA (one-third).
Another difference is the ‘buffer’ used:
… Pfizer switched to using another buffer known as Tris, or tromethamine, in the kids’ version because it increases the stability of the vaccine and allows the vials to be stored at warmer temperatures for a longer period of time.
Both buffers are common in medical products, including other vaccines for children, and have been shown to be safe. Nevertheless, the change has led some people online to falselysuggest that the children’s shot is either not safe or indicative of a problem with the vaccines.
Pfizer told FactCheck.org that the modification does not change manufacturing and that the adult formulation of its vaccine will also soon use Tris for the same stability improvement.
Hi @KarenEliot , the language used in the “guide” is setting up massive loopholes for everyone except the victims, the testing of safety is building a house of cards on top of a house of cards all resting on a highwire of FDA / academic words of comfort. Experts starting their words of comfort with "I don’t think … " leave me with a shiver when talking about 5 to 11 year olds and then mandates then 2 month old babies.
No serious adverse events appear to exist and they even followed half for 2 months and the other half for 2 weeks!??
The numbers are a complete mystery to me - why split placebo and jabbed 1 : 2 and why account for less than the full 4700 in looking at covid positive cases with one non-severe symptom?
These people have serious sociopathic if not psychopathic tendencies, imo.
cheers