What a wonderful world we live in…
“FDA has denied endorsement to the vaccines…” Really? I haven’t seen that verified anywhere else. My first reaction was: Well, maybe I can still hope to see pigs fly.
To be clear, I hope everything said by this unidentified lady speaking to camera is correct, but I’d want to see some further confirmation. Pity too that so many people with NAmerican accents seem to see the word ‘communist’ as nothing more than a meaningless dismissive snarl-noise, a bit like ‘cospithirry’, and have literally zero idea of what it really denotes. Similarly with NAmericans’ (lack of) understanding of the word ‘socialism’; together with their weird use of the word ‘left’ to denote anything they see that’s just slightly less fascistic than the original nazis; the US ‘Democratic’ partei, for example! Different - fantasy - world in NAmerica, innit?
Rob, have you seen any corroboration, from other stories, of the lady’s assertions…? Please reassure me that it’s true!
I found her resemblance to Liara Kuennsberg (sp?) unnerving and had some doubts about the FDA claim.
One of the problems with this pepper-shot approach is that the fact checkers only need to undermine one part of it to cast doubt on the whole. Shorter pieces that make a small number of points work much better.
Witness Whatserface, for example. Annoying voice, for sure, and at times she rattles off her spiel like a tobacco auctioneer, but succinct and witty:
There’s some truth in the allegation that images from May 2020 gas leak have been used to illustrate India covid carnage stories, but only some
Fact Check: NY Post uses Vizag gas leak photo to show people dying in streets due to COVID-19
msm view on fda-
cheers
Haha she has her moments. “They’re more removed from reality than the dude who thinks the stripper likes them - they’re the dudes who think the government loves them”. At the end she’s scathing on the merits of ‘mainstream’.
I thought this that she referred to was interesting:
16/4/21 Doug Ford Gives Ontario Police New Powers to Arbitrarily Stop and Question Anyone Who Leaves Their Home
New measures are “unconstitutional” and will lead to "racial profiling and overboard police powers,” civil liberties group says
by PressProgress
As Whatserface noted, it was reversed in 2 days following a backlash - but a backlash by the police, and doctors, who said they wouldn’t enforce this. The reference to medics was this:
“Earlier in the day Friday, the Canadian Medical Association released a statement calling for “urgent” changes to public health measures amid surging COVID-19 cases, introducing paid sick days so workers can stay-at-home if they’re sick.”
The week before, leader Ford had said anyone calling for paid sick days is “totally irresponsible”.
So it wasn’t mainstream police or mainstream doctors calling for draconian new powers that did not arise from medical or public order need - but those in power.
In fact a few days later the Chief Public Health Officer went back to laying down the law, or tried to:
" 23/4/21 Canada’s COVID-19 restrictions could lift by mid-summer with high vaccination levels
At least 75% of all adults need a first dose and 20% need a second dose to ensure a return to normal in the summer will not trigger a fourth wave of infection come fall, Dr. Theresa Tam, Chief Public Health Officer, said at a COVID-19 modelling update Friday.
If only 55% of adults opt to get vaccinated, modelling suggests that relaxing restrictions could trigger another onslaught of cases by October.
“The bottom line is that we need as many people vaccinated. As much as possible,” Tam said.
Some in power seem so keen to increase it they allow their slip to show.
The media is clearly doing it’s bit by accepting vaccines as a price for ceding fundamental rights, while presenting it as a gift we should be thankful for.
Rhis, none of these vaccines have been properly tested. They were released for public use under an ‘emergency license’ (this is the same for just about all other countries)…
Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines Explained | FDA.
I know you’re familiar with the Nuremburg principles, but for those unfamiliar here’s a brief explainer…
To force someone to take a ‘vaccine’, particularly one that is totally novel and experimental and is still in the trial stage, is an assault on civil liberties and goes against all human rights law and treaties.
I’ve no idea if the woman I started this thread with is real. All I can say is that she is now a large number of medical professionals who are now coming forward.
I will remind people that the official advice about downgrading covid 19 as a highly infectious disease is still on the UK Government web site…
This announcement that covid is no longer considered a major health threat went up on the UK Government web site in March 2020, just days before Bojo brought in the first lockdown.
The announcement is still there (despite lots of bods like me pointing it out), although they seem to have re-worded it. The original can no doubt be found on the WayBackMachine.
Go figure…
Transparent, innit? Gatesoids and BPh crooks sell the big-biz-preferred delusions (with dangled rewards and punishments) to the technocrats, who, being technocrats have been practising since childhood to believe whatever current-orthodoxy stuff accepted authority feeds them; as Chomsky and other point out, such bourgeois straight-A goodthinkers are the world’s most indoctrinateable, especially when the glittering prizes or the appalling career-destructions are there very visibly on offer, to carrotnstick their - softly-malleable - belief-systems.
The technos then feed their long-learned and limpidly-believed multiple-exam-passing shite to the mediawhores, who generally only grasp about ten percent of it (being usually not the sharpest knives in the drawer), but enough to extract the snappy slogans to blizzard onto the telly-trusters, always watching sharply to see what the whore-herd is going with, to make sure that they toe the line-of-the-day. (No need for written memos from the Murdoids upstairs. The hacks already know, from cub-hood on, which side their bread is greased. 'Nuff said!)
And the pocket-pols, compulsively sussing the plebs’ moods and trends, as always primarily to stay in post, make their portentous-sounding, but actually shallow, empty and deeply ignorant pronouncements about what ‘we’ are allowed to do - and what not. Even ham the odd on-camera tear, when it seems that it might play well. (“Once you can fake sincerity convincingly, you’ve got it made in politics!” )
All for the greater good, of course, and with considerable irritation at that minority of know-nothing plebs who won’t immediately listen to the ‘experts’, shut up, stop asking fool questions, and do as they’re told. Must be very annoying when you know the truth in depth (as you think) and those who (as you think) know nothing won’t immediately defer to you. Democracy? Highly over-rated, my dear! Expertise is what counts!
Thus do a small bunch of crooks, in various rival famiglie factions, manipulate a larger number of unjustifiably over-confident technos, to manipulate in their turn an even larger majority of TDS sufferers, panicked into swallowing anything that mummy authority tells them. All entirely for their own safety, natch! Nothing possibly to do with class-war and shysters on the make… Oh dear me no! What lese-majestie to even think such a thing. And when there’s a global emergency on, too! So irresponsible!
Jeez, what a species we are…
Thank god for the awkward dissidents!
PS: Rob, I don’t doubt for a moment that what Michel is saying in the linked piece is exactly correct. I’m just wondering whether the lady introduced as a whistle-blowing Canadian nurse has her facts right when she asserts that the FDA has decided not to give any approval of the damned poison-stabs.
That’s what they should do, of course; they should immediately demand a crash global pause on all the injections, being as they are unnecessary, ineffectual and dangerous. But stuffed as such ‘public’ outfits are with the sort of line-toers whom I sketch above, will the FDA and the other ‘responsible’ agencies actually do it? I’ve heard no such announcements. Hope that’s just me being behind the curve. Certainly, it’s high time for a dam-break of public resistance to start flooding out.
Apart from the nurse’s daft comment about the FDA refusing to do what it always does and promptly jumped on by AP - did I hear correctly that the UN are walking the streets of the UK and will do so until 2023!? this I think is a total misreading of Hertfordshire CC hiring Marshalls to walk the streets into 2023 (
)
but a big jump from HCC to UN methinks! - this looks like the power of facebook to distort and trip the unwary who are constantly looking for confirmation of their point of view.
cheers
It’s got nothing to do with ‘confirmation of their point of view’. It’s just about common sense.
Where are all the dead and dying people…? there aren’t any, beyond the usual flu season.
Yet people have been hypnotised by Governments and The Presstitutes into believing that there’s some kind of modern day bubonic plague, which is patently absurd.
If you can except that propostion you then have to ask what’s really going on here. I would say that the agenda is very, very sinister.
Sinister, but not working very well, thank heaven.
Hi @RobG, I totally agree with your post here apart from the -just common sense not confirmation point of view - with regard to 2 of the nurse’s statements - the FDA claim that they won’t authorise covid vaccines and that the UN are walking the streets of the UK! I would contend that we are all victims of confirmation bias at some time or another, why would the nurse be any different, we all make mistakes. I’m happy to admit my mistake if you can show me her remarks on these 2 specific elements are correct. I have no difficulty in accepting most of her other comments as they “confirm my point of view”
cheers
CJ1, Rhis recently posted an interview with Dr Mike Yeadon…
This is well worth a watch, because Yeadon is a highly qualified individual. This time last year, Yeadon was against all the ‘conspiracy theory’ memes. Now, after watching events over the last year, Yeadon is totally onboard with most of the NWO stuff, because he can see no other possible explanation for what’s going on.
Our nurse at the top of this thread has also reached similar conclusions. The problem is, once you start going down the rabbit hole, and the realisation that the world is not quite what you thought it is, it’s easy to buy into all sorts of other stuff, many of which are psy-ops. The flat earther crap is a prime example of this.
Correct! Once you face up to the fact that dreadful conspiracies really do happen, you must, perforce, get good at sussing the sound-seeming ones from the cloud-cuckoo ones. Plenty of the latter about. Getting suckers hooked on flatearthy-type daft cospithirries is another way to psyop them into irrelevance, and out of the picture of active - and actually-effective - socio-political commentary and action. Just what the manipulators want. Nothing easier than to ridicule into total ineffectualness anyone who proclaims the ‘truth’ of one of the dafties. In fact, the suckers do it to themselves, saving the manipulators the work.
Don’t people even have to identify themselves anymore? Some anonymous person who says she’s from Halifax makes a video and I’m supposed to take it seriously. Jesus!
People say they fear for their jobs, incomes, careers if they step out of line, so plead for anonymity. Difficult call. I think their fears are real enough, and realistic.
Rhis, Gareth Icke had a nurse on his programme today who is quite outspoken and doesn’t mind being identified…
Most of them, though, prefer to remain anonymous (for the reasons you point out), and there are now a large number of health professionals speaking out.
Here’s another anonymous nurse this week (UK NHS)…
I’ll probably get banned for posting this stuff.
That’s where we’re at: a global police state, and like Gareth Icke I now have very little tolerance of people who don’t understand what’s going on.
Just ask yourself one question: is this all normal…
Perhaps but she’s in a video on the internet so that wouldn’t seem to apply here.