Mike insists that there’s an already-visible uptick in deaths as a direct result of the poison-shots pandemic. Sobering stuff. Is he over-stating it? Well, the precautionary principle alone would say: treat it as if he isn’t, just to be on the safe side. His knowledgeable analysis certainly seems feasible, and does indeed explain why there is such an absolutely-unmistakable torrent of lies and deceitful propaganda getting hosed at us all right now. Why that determination to create a global sheep-stampede, if there isn’t some such unadmitted agenda afoot, like the one Mike proposes? Sure, it’s possible that an awful lot of the people pushing the official narrative really believe it sincerely. Modern professional propaganda does that to the best us, when it gets us on our vulnerable spots. But in that case - that many of the pro-narrative functionaries really believe it - why the Gatesian lie-torrent on top? It seems that it’s all about generating stampedes…
I should say that Mike’s anguished review of the mass-depopulation hypothesis fits very well with grim - and deeply unwelcome - but nevertheless realistic nightmares that have been haunting my waking mind for years now. We ARE in a global human population-overshoot right now, whatever the reality-dodging denialists may say. And it’s crystal clear that we have no - zero - realistic plans to alleviate it effectively. Leaving only the Gaian option, or the deliberate, unadmitted, unmandated mass-cull option as the two likeliest outcomes.
Jeez, what a diabolical mess. Still, my conviction that hom sap is simply not up to the sort of Bondish hyper-villain plotting that Mike outlines does offer a smidge of comfort. Seems to me that the willingness to buy the constantly-mutating stampede narrative is already ebbing amongst the common citizens, as we weary of the whole ridiculous screw-up. That natural mass sobering-up may well bring the whole wretched slide towards catastrophe to a spontaneous halt, even now: