As usual, Chris remains (in my opinion) by far the best voice on the whole Covid pandemic.
Two important points worth mentioning:
The distinction between SARS-COV-2 (infection with the virus) vs COVID-19 (actually symptomatic illness)
Interesting to see his shift towards Ivermectin++ from previously supporting HCQ++. He believes that Ivermectin is even more effective at treating Covid.
Weird isnât it how massed anecdotals suddenly donât count as âevidenceâ. Doctors who, for generations, have described anecdotal cases to each other, and thus have built a vast assemblage of pragmatic approaches which have been seen to work, for some reason, whatever it might be, are suddenly disqualified from putting forward their huge aggregated clinical-experience mountain as valid evidence.
This - allegedly-scientific - attitude not only purports to disqualify the accumulated practical, empirical skills of Western doctors, but the even vaster resources of TCM and - in some cases - even of acupuncture. And letâs not even get into the subtleties of homoeopathy, potent - and entirely relevant - placebo effect and all. Which powerful and ever-present effect of course also plays into all the traditional shamanic healing techniques as well: A whole other world - or set of worlds - still to explore.
Must do better, CEBM! Earn your âEâ properly! Investigate each therapeutic approach according to its own doctrines, and - most significantly of all - on its outcomes: DO PEOPLE BENEFIT AND GET BETTER? Yes? Then itâs a legitimate therapy. Hippocrates would not have been amused at these exclusionsâŚ
PS: Chris should have been in charge at the WHO. His advice to âtry everything; and refine and refine; whatever works!â is exactly right, and would have produced a global outcome little worse than an average seasonal flu. But then, he wouldnât have been on the take, and would have probably wound up the victim of âan unfortunate air accidentââŚ
Iâm coming late (again!) but for what its worth, I think Heneghan is a gatekeeper. The only reason he keeps getting on Sky is he is opposition, but not too much opposition. For instance he bases many of his statements on the assumption that lockdown slows the spread of the virus, nor does he ever question the loss of civil liberties.
And for the scientists amongst you, a detailed explanation of vitamin Dâs role in disease prevention. It moves from that to a 15 year study which produces a âstatistically significantâ result. All of that is outside the context of Coroni. It then goes on to Covid.