I kep coming across reports of the jab magnetic thing. Sounds daft but is it? Disinfo scam? Or what?
I didnât watch the video. I doubt that even as much as 5ml of liquid - whatever it is - is injected. Does it seem even faintly plausible, even if that was 100% metalloid, that it would exert any magnetic attraction?
The videos Iâve glanced at seem to be people pressing a CR2032 battery against their arm and professing amazement when it doesnât fall off.
Image 1: brand new CR2032 cell, Image 2: the same cell magically sticks to my left shoulder
Itâs still there 5 minutes later.
So⌠Yes, itâs a Disinfo scam. Anyone who tweets this out or shares it on Facebook will be very easy to Fact Check into a corner, undermining anything else they have said.
2 Likes
People are doing it with paramagnetic metal objects other than batteries. It really doesnât seem to be credible to write it all off as error/fraud; not just yet; may be, maybe not. Itâs worth looking at that vox-pop straw-poll that the The Highwire did, to see some at least initially persuasive instances. Iâm afraid that this is one of those all too common (and deeply unsatisfying, but necessary) times when we have to reserve judgement and wait to see what - if anything - comes clear eventually. Opt for the old Scots Law verdict: âNot provenâ.
1 Like
That metal-based ingredients are in the injections I donât doubt. the pfizer factsheets are plain enough, potassium for example.
That it renders ones upper arm, or any other part of the anatomy, capable of exerting a magnetic attraction, is beyond credulity.
And that is deliberate.
If itâs really beyond credulity, how do we explain people doing it - particularly during that Highwire vox-pox test? Are we to suspect that the Bigtree operation is controlled opposition?
Iâd probably normally agree Karen, but a friend sent a Spanish video clip showing a man with children sticking coins on his shoulder and further down towards the elbow, and then finally sticking his mobile phone on. The coins appeared to stick on just like to a magnet, when thrown from a short distance away. The video itself was quite uncontrived.
But even if it is true, and something about the vaccine is causing some sort of static electricity response, it doesnât actually mean anything - other than that there is something odd in the vaccines - which we know already!
Unfortunately itâs just another thing that âscientistsâ and âexpertsâ can throw at Covid sceptics to devalue them - still further below the radar.
1 Like
If it works with non-paramagnetic metals like coins, then it really is weird; something very peculiar is going on. And I could see that going the other way with public perception: it could add to scepticism and querying about the poison-stabs. It certainly should. This is something I never heard of before, with injections or anything else.
I am sorry not to be able to rattle on at great length, typing as I am on a mobile device.
Yet again:
The videos are nonsense. They are intended to entrap the gullible. There may well be some germ of truth in the idea that vaxxxine has magnetic properties. A stupid video clip pretending that oneâs upper arm becomes magnetic neither proves nor disproves this.
That is all I said, or meant to say.
I offer no comment on del bigtree as Iâve never watched more than a few minutes of his videocasts.
1 Like
Exactly the point I tried to make. No doubt there are a wide range of clips, and the one you describe @Dimac sounds intriguing.
Conjuring.
1 Like
If true it means somethingâŚour bodiesâ EM fields (âaurasâ), are very sensitive, anything that disrupts them is bad news⌠Some time ago I was Tweeted by a guy who claimed that whilst incarcerated in a Long Island prison for fraud he and other inmates were âencouragedâ to take part in a micro-chip insertion research projectâŚhe seemed very distressed and after corresponding a little with myself and other acc. holders simply disappeared off the radarâŚ
That I would not be surprised by, thereâs a great deal more to come out about this
1 Like
It proves that something odd is happening, K. Itâs a piece of data. No entirely convincing explanatory thesis is yet clear. But it isnât right to claim that an event - however mysterious and on-its-face ridiculous - is nonsense. Quite a lot of people are discovering it. As always with stuff sweeping windily across the internet, it needs a bucket of salt. It may indeed be a distraction/confusion scam. Any tyro illusionist could concoct the sort of videos that show it, sure; without a doubt. But thereâs enough anecdotal evidence by now for it to be worthy of a deeper look, if anyone can manage that. The Highwire vox-pop segment alone justifies that. Such exercises, despite journalistsâ liking for them, have virtually zero evidential weight. But they do serve as a serious invitation to look a bit further, with more credibly-watertight protocols, and see what comes up.
Muz seems convinced RhisâŚ, heâs a man of immense knowledge and experience and heâs often more âradicalâ than I, however, Iâve learned to trust much (although by no means all), of what he says: https://www.facebook.com/MantraMuz/posts/10227058353865214
Canât see that post, G. Faecesbrook insists that I âlog inâ to continue. I say eff off. Can you copy and paste? Iâd like to hear what he says.
âMankind is sleep-walking (or should I say âsheep-walkingâ?) to the slaughterhouse. Thank heavens there are still a few of us with our eyes open, unhypnotised by the media propaganda. Iâm so happy that 98% of my readers still have operational brain cells and there are only a sprinkling of dyed-in-the-wool trolls.â
âTo paraphrase Dr. Vernon Coleman: âThose doctors and nurses giving inoculations without outlining the risks and letting patients know it is a gene-altering experiment, are war criminalsâ.â
âit is not happening with every vaccine, only those with nano-microchips. It depends on the company producing the jabs.â
âAnother interesting phenomenon after the jab. What do you think?â
Join us on FacebookâŚapart from touting his book anti-vax anti-covid-conspiracy stuff is all he is posting right nowâŚ
âDr. Astrid Stuckelberger investigator of the W.H.O. blows the whistle on what is really going on. I cannot post the link as it will be instantly taken down because the truth is not in conformity with âCommunity Standards.â But please look her up on Google if you want to know what is behind the worldwide lockdown before her valuable testimony is suppressed. She maintains that the new strains are in the âvaccinesâ and are transmitted to the non-vaxxed via the vaccinated. Another aspect of the âsheddingâ phenomenon.â
A close, wholly reliable relation has just had an AZ, part 2. Reports no magnetism of any kind around the arm.
Thatâs not to say it didnât happen with others but the whole thing is murky and as ever, uncertainty in claims made favours the powers. As K suggested, it could easily have been contrived as a red herring to effectively undermine the antis and hesitants.
1 Like
And that is exactly what it has done. Here âweâ as all reasonable people (I exclude myself of course) are debating something that may or may not be interesting, a minor facet of the whole scam, when in fact we should be talking about how to get the truth out. How the NWO has a history of plandemics, censorship, lies and obfuscation. How journoâs have been co-opted to the narrative, or smeared until they are irrelevant. Why doctors and nurses, are so invested in their jobs and careers, that they knowingly go against the fundemental principle of their profession of do no harm. I could go on but I guess you will all get the gist.
Apologies for the rant.
2 Likes
I wouldnât dismiss the nano chip thing⌠"âThe VeriChip⢠is a Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) tag produced commercially for implantation in human beings. Its proposed uses include identification of medical patients, physical access control, contactless retail payment, and even the tracing of kidnapping victims.As the authors explain, the VeriChip is vulnerable to simple, over-the-air spoofing attacks. In particular, an attacker capable of scanning a VeriChip, eavesdropping on its signal, or simply learning its serial number can create a spoof device whose radio appearance is indistinguishable from the original. We explore the practical implications of this security vulnerability.â https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1656959/2
"The video to which this comment from Muz refers has been blockedâŚ
âPeter, she was saying that there is so much misinformation on the Net, and so many of her fellow physicians have been suppressed and marginalised for years when trying to get the true information out to the public, so she is taking the risk of expressing what she knows from inside the medical fraternity, having studied and monitored what she is revealing for the past twenty years. Bill Gates has funded countless vaccine manufacturers with billions of dollars to create a nano-chip vaccine that can alter your genetic programming for life, which can then be controlled from external sources. This is not science fantasy. This is the actual plan unfolding. Every single thing you doâif vax-chippedâwill be monitored and even your thoughts can be altered when your chip is hooked up to the smart-grid. Humans who accept this will become genetic mutants.
No one knows what the effects of this vaccine they are rushing through, without trial or protocol will be, least of all the manufacturers, who will not be liable for any injury, paralysis or death to the recipient.
Dr. Madej has been to scientific and business conferences for many years where this subject has been relentlessly on the agenda. It is for real. And she is scared. She was fighting back tears as she related this dreadful Frankensteinian scenario that big business is spending millions on in preparation for the mandate. If we donât wake up now and shout out, it will be too late.â Muz Murray"
â* **EPIC Urges Privacy Safeguards for RFID, Copyright Technology.**In comments to the Article 29 Working Group, an association of leading European privacy officials, EPIC has recommended strong safeguards for RFIDs and techniques to track the use of digital works. EPICâs Comments on RFID(pdf) recommend a prohibition on " chippingâ people and warn that unencrypted RFID passports pose significant security risks. EPICâs Comments on Digital Rights Management(pdf), submitted in collaboration with the Yale Law School Information Society Project, focus on the intersection of copyright protection and user privacy. (Apr. 1, 2005)
FDA Privacy Warning: Donna-Bea Tillman, Director, Office of Device Evaluation, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, was quoted in the Privacy Times (Vol. 24 Number 19, Oct. 20, 2004) as saying that:
ââŚby agreeing to have chip implanted, the understanding would be that a patient has tacitly agreed to make information [stored in the VeriChip] available to someone with a reader,â she said, adding that the potential for unauthorized medical records access âis an issue.â
Introduction
The VeriChip Personal Identification System is a small radio frequency identification device (RFID) that is implanted into the human body. VeriChip raises the same privacy issues as RFID tags.
- VeriChip FAQ, VeriChip Corporation.
- EPIC RFID Page.
VeriChip is marketed as a universal means of identification, intended for use in a variety of settings, including financial and transportation security, residential and commercial building access, and military and government security. For an initial âchippingâ fee, as well as a monthly $9.95 subscription fee, customersâ arms are implanted with a glass chip about the size of a grain of rice, containing a unique verification number. When activated by a VeriChip scanner, that number is emitted by a small radio frequency, providing instant access to information logged in the Global VeriChip Subscriber (GVS) Registry.
On October 12, 2004, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved VeriChip for medical applications in the United States. The approval will allow VeriChip to be used to confirm identity, and check the blood type, potential allergies and medical history of unconscious patients. The device is subject to Class II special controls to mitigate potential risks identified by the FDA, which include adverse tissue reaction, electromagnetic interference, and magnetic resonance imaging incompatibility.
- Process: How VeriChip Works , VeriChip Corporation.
- Letter from Donna Bea-Tillman, Phd., Director, Office of Device Evaluation, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, to James Santelli, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Office, Digital Angel Corporation 1 (October 12, 2004).
In March 2004, a nightclub in Barcelona began using VeriChip as a sort of embedded VIP card for its customers. Patrons of the Baja Beach Club can pay 125 Euros to have the chip implanted, then use it to bypass entry lines and keep track of bar tabs.
Planned future uses for VeriChip include a variety of financial, security, defense, homeland security and secure-access applications. ASDX sees its product as âtamper-proof personal identificationâ for use in credit card and ATM access, airport security, and port congestion management, as well as admission to military bases, government installations, and private-sector buildings. The system is marketed as a stand-alone product or for use in conjunction with biometric devices. ASDX has started a marketing campaign under the slogan âGet Chippedâ, that includes a traveling van called the âChipMobileâ.
VeriChip Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Applied Digital Solutions, Inc (ASDX). According to a recent report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, ASDX âfocuses on a range of life enhancing, personal safeguard technologies, early warning alert systems, miniaturized power sources and security monitoring systems combined with the comprehensive data management services required to support themâ. ASDX customers include several federal agencies, such as Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Justice, the Social Security Administration, the Veterans Administration and the United States Postal Service, as well as the insurance, utility, communications, and high tech industries.
News
- Rob Stein, Implantable Medical ID Approved by FDA, Washington Post, October 14, 2004.
- Barnaby J. Feder and Tom Zeller, Jr., Identity Badge Worn Under Skin Approved for Use in Healthcare, N.Y. Times, October 14, 2004.
- Chetna Purohit, Technology Gets Under Clubbersâ Skin, CNN International.com, June 9, 2004.2" https://epic.org/privacy/rfid/verichip.html
"FDA approves implantable chip to access medical records
Copyright and License information Disclaimer
The US Food and Drug Administration has approved Verichip, an implantable radiofrequency identification device for patients, which would enable doctors to access their medical records.
Doctors hope that use of the device will result in be better treatment for patients in emergencies or when a patient is unconscious or lacks medical records. Some people have raised fears, however, that it could lead to infringements of patientsâ privacy.
The chip is the size of a grain of rice and is implanted under local anaesthesia beneath the patientâs skin in the triceps area of the right arm, where it is invisible to the naked eye. It contains a unique 16 digit identification number. A handheld scanner passed near the injection site activates the chip and displays the number on the scanner. Doctors and other medical staff use the identification number to access the patientâs records on a secure database via encrypted internet access.
A similar chip has been used for about 15 years to trace lost pets and to identify livestock. More than 30 million âHome Againâ chips have been implanted in pets, and a million are implanted each year in the United States.
The chipâs manufacturer, Applied Digital Systems, of Delray Beach, Florida, will donate 200 scanners to major trauma centres in the United States. The company sees its main markets as physiciansâ practices, emergency rooms at hospitals, and extended care facilities. Each scanner costs about $650 (ÂŁ354; âŹ508), but the cost will decrease with volume, said Angela Fulcher, the companyâs vice president for marketing. She said that implanting a chip in an individual costs $150 to $200.
âWe foresee that scanning a patient for a Verichipâas it is a very simple procedureâwill be part of the standard patient entry protocol [in an emergency room], such as taking temperature, checking blood pressure, etc,â Ms Fulcher told the BMJ .
The Verichip database can include medical records, information about implanted medical devices, personal information, family contact information, and insurance information. The patient and his or her doctors would enter data in the database.
Dr Richard Seelig, the companyâs vice president for medical applications, says that the chip would be useful in patients who receive care from several doctors in different locations, who have complex medical histories, and who take many medications.
The chip has potential applications for protecting security, such as limiting access to nuclear power plants, for identifying military personnel and including their medical information, and for protecting financial transactions such as using cash dispensing machines.
About 1000 people worldwide have been implanted with the chip. The attorney general of Mexico and some of his staff use the technology to access secure facilities in Mexico city, the company says. Because the chip can be activated only at close range and because it becomes inactive immediately afterward, it cannot be used for long distance reading of information or tracking of individuals.
Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, DC, told the BMJ that use of an implantable chip was âlike branding cattle.â He thought it was a mistake for the FDA to have approved the chip because of privacy issues.
Articles from The BMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC526112/
Nb. Not nano-techâŚat least such is not common/public knowledge yetâŚ
Not sure if this is relevant. âThe use of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) to deliver genes via magnetofection shows promise in improving the efficiency of gene delivery both in vitro and in vivo.â
1 Like
Thanks G. Youâve posted some useful finds on this thread. Keep digging! 
1 Like