5 Filters

Yellow-wash : the MHRA's view on 1100 deaths in the UK from covid vaccines - coincidence

Covid
#1

Hi folks, just a quick review of the Yellow card 6th May “report” reveals this:

" Coronavirus vaccine - weekly summary of Yellow Card reporting

Updated 6 May 2021

“Events with a fatal outcome

Vaccination and surveillance of large populations means that, by chance, some people will experience and report a new illness or events in the days and weeks after vaccination. A high proportion of people vaccinated early in the vaccination campaign were very elderly, and/or had pre-existing medical conditions. Older age and chronic underlying illnesses make it more likely that coincidental adverse events will occur, especially given the millions of people vaccinated. It is therefore important that we carefully review these reports to distinguish possible side effects from illness that would have occurred irrespective of vaccination. Fatal cases associated with extremely rare blood clots with lowered platelets are described above.

Part of our continuous analysis includes an evaluation of natural death rates over time, to determine if any specific trends or patterns are occurring that might indicate a vaccine safety concern. Based on age-stratified all-cause mortality in England and Wales taken from the Office for National Statistics death registrations, several thousand deaths are expected to have occurred, naturally, within 7 days of the many millions of doses of vaccines administered so far, mostly in the elderly.

The MHRA has received 364 UK reports of suspected ADRs to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in which the patient died shortly after vaccination, 722 reports for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca , 2 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and 14 where the brand of vaccine was unspecified. The majority of these reports were in elderly people or people with underlying illness. Usage of the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca has increased rapidly and as such, so has reporting of fatal events with a temporal association with vaccination however, this does not indicate a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccine played a role in the death.**

A range of other isolated or series of reports of non-fatal, serious suspected ADRs have been reported. These all remain under continual review, including through analysis of expected rates in the absence of vaccine. There are currently no indications of specific patterns or rates of reporting that would suggest the vaccine has played a role.**

4. Conclusion

At the time of this report, over 127,500 people across the UK have died within 28 days of a positive test for coronavirus.

Vaccination is the single most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from COVID-19. A national immunisation campaign has been underway since early December 2020.

In clinical trials, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca and COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have demonstrated very high levels of protection against symptomatic infection. Data are now available on the impact of the vaccination campaign in reducing infections and illness in the UK.

All vaccines and medicines have some side effects. These side effects need to be continuously balanced against the expected benefits in preventing illness.

Following widespread use of these vaccines across the UK, the vast majority of suspected adverse reaction reports so far confirm the safety profile seen in clinical trials. Most reports relate to injection-site reactions (sore arm for example) and generalised symptoms such as a ‘flu-like’ illness, headache, chills, fatigue, nausea, fever, dizziness, weakness, aching muscles, and rapid heartbeat. Generally, these reactions are not associated with more serious illness and likely reflect an expected, normal immune response to the vaccines.

Cases of an extremely rare specific type of blood clot with low blood platelets is being investigated and updated advice has been provided.

The expected benefits of the vaccines in preventing COVID-19 and serious complications associated with COVID-19 far outweigh any currently known side effects. As with all vaccines and medicines, the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is continuously monitored and benefits and possible risks remain under review.

We take every report of a suspected ADR seriously and encourage everyone to report through the Yellow Card scheme.”

We have of course no idea how MHRA reviewed the evidence or came to their spurious conclusions. And of course we know from studies that only 1% of adverse effects are ever reported.

Of course there was no reference to the continuing story about covid-jabbed shedding of particles affecting non-jabees!
Five Doctors agree that COVID-19 injections are bioweapons and discuss what to do about It – Foreign Affairs Intelligence Council

Has anyone seen any more material on this subject of jabee shedding?

Sadly, yesterday 4 more people died of Covid - were these vaccinated, no idea!

The UK Gov is acting like the US Gov in their imperial wars - they don’t count the black bags of vaccine victims only virus vaccines which they blame on a natural event!

No-one is even looking at non-virus/vaccine deaths caused by Government social-cide through isolation, distancing and mask policies.

cheers

#2

Shocking! That whole government screed seems to be a tissue of lies - or at the very least of complete delusions. Highly challengeable assertions leaping out at practically every line.

There’s no wonder people have difficulty crediting the scam interpretation of the covid panic. The lie is so enormous, and so all-embracing, that normal human psychology just can’t believe it can be so. Yet - for those with the natural tolerance to be able to look at them - the brute facts trickling out in many places oblige simple reason to admit that some sort of dishonest scam is happening, quite obviously:

Instant cognitive dissidence, retreat into denial, run to mummy authority for comfort and orders!

Alas, so many of us seem to have fallen victim to this terror derangement syndrome over the past fifteen months. What a disaster!

3 Likes
#3

You’re spot on there Rhis. Indeed the lie is so enourmous, even for the few enlightened and informed wide-awake people, there is still discussion of “Covid-19” as if it was actually a real new disease. Assuming the official figures can be believed (as the best we actually have), a quick look at the global flu deaths should be enough to satisfy most that “Covid-19” is flu.

For anyone awake, there is so much evidence that Coroni (I can’t take it seriously anymore) can be safely, cheaply treated with vitamins C and D, Ivermectin, Budesinide, and of course, hydroxychloroquine. And guess what. Everyone with one of these treatments is a living testament to the scam within days.

And as for all the blood clots, has anyone, anywhere done an analysis correlating blood-clots to regional five g (can’t put that properly for fear of the site being taken down) roll-out? Perhaps Coroni isn’t the only thing going on?

As @Dimac said in another thread, even friends are becoming difficult to talk to. Unless one is at least half awake, it seems to me to be impossible to even begin the conversation. I have a friend who’s son lives in the US. He was told in August 2019, to stock up on certain things as “something” was going to happen. Yet, she still can’t accept any of this was planned. That’s my cognitive disonance!

1 Like
#4

There’s a web app based on the official stats for vaccine reactions in the UK here:

https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports

#5

While I am 100% contrary to the TDS afflicted Covidians, I’m only 90% in tune with the idea this is just flu on cyber-steroids, as there is just too much detailed understanding of the genome from sources I regard as credible, like Prof Raoult in Marseilles. but that difference is not so important, as Raoult believes that with HCQ+ treatment we would never have had this epidemic, and that lock-downs make no difference and should never have been used, and that children should be allowed to get the infection and pass on their immunity, etc etc.
So my yardstick for judgement is that all the authorities in our worst afflicted countries have refused to counter HCQ or Ivermectin, and so are responsible for hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths associated with CV LRT infections. There can be little motivation for this except corruption linked to big Pharma - as well as the Gatesoid cult of course.
The problem for me though is that many on our side argue that the virus doesn’t exist and that everything is just virtual and faked - and I don’t believe this is true - it’s not so blackk and white. It’s just that the virus is simply not serious enough to justify developing a vaccine against it, and then having a global campaign to get the whole world vaccinated, including the hundreds of millions who are already immune from catching the disease. That serious scientist cannot see this is a fraud is a victory for the science of fear-porn.

#6

I also think that there MUST be a red line drawn on the vaccination of children. It is criminal child abuse on an unimaginable scale, even if the risk is low - which I doubt will prove the case in years ahead. But I have no idea how on earth we can stop this.

#7

Hi @Dimac
In Europe including the UK there are the principles of the Human Rights Convention which includes an absolute right not to be treated inhumanely (Article 3) or interfered with ( Article 8 )and this is supplemented by the right not to be the subject of discrimination for holding a different opinion about something ( Article 14) - the courts are years behind of course so it could be a long wait for a foreign holiday and there is no certainty the courts would agree with you.

( The last case in Europe on child vaccination Vavricka ( 17/04/2021 ) went in favour of the Czech Republic on the grounds of giving the State power to determine its own rules on public health despite there being no proof offered that proved vaccines worked to save lives or prevent infection or transmission! Just one dissenting judge - who I think got it right - from Wojtyczec who said the Czech Republic had the burden of justifying the medical intervention and they did not do so in this case. )
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209039

I think that case can be distinguished as it ultimately rested on whether the State could impose a fine on the parents of a few hundred euros for not submitting their child to an injection - in the current cases of covid injections we are talking about loss of fundamental rights to free movement and free speech and clear discriminatory behaviour.

I suppose it is possible to bring a case of judicial review but in this era of Assange and Murray decisions I have little confidence in our system ( not that I had much before these cases!)

The courts seem reluctant to examine the pros and cons of “vaccination” preferring to leave it to the elected Government to determine - they may also be swayed by public ( wholly ill or misinformed) support for the Government’s policy.

cheers

Fixing the Vacts around the policy - NHS making changes again to improve the Vax stats
The Rule of Claw rips up our rights as foreshadowed by Anna de Buisseret
A good explanation of the legal issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and all the rest of it
#8

My assessment too, D: there is indeed a nasty flu about, killing the usual small percentage that flus kill every year, with - just possibly - an excess-death figure, though it’s simply not possible to know that for sure right now, ALL information streams having been subjected to such corruption during the scam. And of course there’s the abiding suspicion that this pathogen-whatever-it-is has been tampered with, to give it gain-of-nastiness. So we’re still discovering just how much worse than an average flu it is.

And yes of course: the idea of injecting children with these UID (Unnecessary, Ineffectual and Dangerous) poison-stabs is an utter abomination, which - on its own - should destine all perps. for the dock at a - hypothetical - Nurnberg 2; if that can ever be got to happen.

#9

Yes Nuremberg… but the courts look like Vanessa Baraitser now - even when what appears to be a cast iron case is brought they give way to some higher power and throw it out. This just happened in OZ, when a case was brought in the high court by an Australian 73 year old who has been stuck in India for the last year, and was prevented from returning to Australia recently during the height of the hysteria there - when our government declared that anyone coming back from India would be fined $65,000 and imprisoned for 5 years.
There was some protest over this, but it was upheld by the court as it was from the “biosecurity” department, whose rules override things like common law. Someone supposedly threatening to bring in the plague could cost the lives of millions of Australians, so denying their natural justice was… justified.

At the same time a man returning from India via the Maldives and spending two weeks in hotel quarantine returned to Victoria last week and developed symptoms, after being infected while in the quarantine hotel. At this point 50,000 people have been tested from the many places he visited in 4 days, but NOT ONE person has been found positive, except his partner. How many times does this have to happen? How do we even know the guy exists. Now we are told
" VIctoria has controlled this outbreak successfully" - but they did nothing at all!! He developed symptoms and got tested and was found positive before Vic did anything, and nothing happened! So it’s wins all round for disinformation and biosecurity Nazis, and more cap-doffing to the Great Covidian. (who in this case happens to be Jeroem WEIMAR! couldn’t make it up, but they did.)

#10

Beeb ‘news’ here is admitting that ‘cases’ are practically non-existent in Britain now, with an addendum tacked on that some prominent propaganda stiff has said it was “because the vaccines are working”, not for the obvious reason that we’re now in the early Summer season, when flus normally just about disappear anyway; and because the covid-flu has now fallen back into endemic status, where it’s hard-pressed to find anyone to infect, because we’re now mostly post-mild-infection immune - naturally, without ‘benefit’ of injections. So, at any rate, I surmise. It has to be surmising, because the information about this whole scam is all so unreliable now. I’m just going on common-sense observation, and the past record of what usually happens.

How the near-vanished ‘cases’ are even calculated now isn’t mentioned. If it’s through the PCR untest, then the report is even more damning of the mad things we’re doing about the flu. But the whole thing seems to be getting damped down quietly - the prop-screeching, I mean - as if the PTsB are sussing that this particular scam is reaching its final sell-by date.

And to add a mouldy cherry to the stale bun, ‘news’ today that the damned HS2 racket is to begin a three-year, 24/7 tunnel boring operation under the Chilterns. What it is to live in a mad state, run by schmucks whose only saving grace is that they’re so incompetent that their damages are somewhat reduced by it! And like you poor buggers in Australia, there’s not the slightest sign here of we plebs waking up to the execrable pissmire of corruption that our country has become, and rising up en masse to insist on radical improvements. Bozo’s ‘popularity’ actually creeps up a bit now and then. Christ!

#11

Hi @Dimac . I’m not taking issue with your post, and I am not a scientist by any stretch of the imagination. But …

I agree that the differences between “Covid-19” and flu are there. However, as far as I am aware, there is not a defined sympton list that says this is flu, and that is Coroni. From many of the early reports of hospitalised Coroni patients, there was a difficulty breathing. Perhaps, just perhaps, there is a correlation between the sysmptons of exposure to millimeter EMF’s (aka five gee). I.e An inability of the blood to absorb oxygen. So I accept there may be something more than flu, but I have difficulty accepting its a novel virus.

#12

When it comes to symptoms Pat I’m prepared to consider anything, and dispute everything - like the whole idea of “long Covid” - which I can’t distinguish from ME, and I think has been put out there simply to make younger people afraid of catching the virus. If I lived somewhere that I could have been exposed to CV19 I’m sure I’d suffer from it too!
However, when it comes to the actual virus, its origins and nature, so much of what I believe about this vile scheme depends on the genetic engineering of the virus, and the precise details of its construction and variations. Illustrations of the spike protein area in papers shown by my guide Didier Raoult give precise positions for various mutation collections, numbered as B 1.1.7. and such like.
In terms of infectivity or lethality, there is little to suggest there is any substantial difference between them - like the 1.3 to 1.4 times infectiousness of the UK variant, which was declared with great solemnity following “research” on the basis of pure speculation.
I would have to say that although I’m not happy about the possible effects of 5 G, nor do I have the slightest confidence in assurances that it is safe, that I don’t believe it could have some magic effect in producing CV symptoms.

I have one other theory, which is that it was said that the part of the spike protein targeted by the mRNA vaccine was the same genetically as part of the SARS-1 spike. It seems to me that the vaccine manufacturers used the same blueprints as those who bred the chimaeric virus… perhaps!

#13

I’ve wondered myself why no-one seems to talk about the speed of jab production and the GOF operations on virus’s in Wuhan or Fort Detrick or perhaps Porton Down. It makes perfect sense that research labs produced an anti-dote to the nightmare pathogens they were creating if only to protect key elites! Let’s not forget that no-one seems to have taken an electron microscopic picture of the isolated virus - only parts of cells they think contain it alongside loads of other similar stuff, so having an inside picture of the gene make-up of the little bugger would be highly attractive to big pharma.

cheers

Where do I vote for this coalition
#14
1 Like
#15

@Dimac Whatever the situation, it seems Covid-19 helps you live longer!! :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

From the UK Column News (they get all their stats from official UK government sources), the average age of death (UK) in 2020 was 81. The average age of those dying from “Covid-19” was 83. QED.

Around 50 minutes

2 Likes
#16

It was a cracking edition, Patrick Henningsen seems to be getting back to his top form.

#17

Thanks for this useful link PatB.
I didn’t know about this group (nor the UK Medical Freedom Alliance, which I’ve now posted about here, Where do I vote for this coalition).

The well-informed blog has posted this on Lateral Flow Tests.

The sensitivity of Lateral Flow tests is difficult to calibrate in the community; the chance that a positive will be false depends on the prevailing percentage of the population that have ‘the virus’. With this running at around 1 in 1000 in Scotland even with an a priori 99.9% sensitivity** (ie 1 in 1000 have the virus) a positive result is as likely to be false as not - cue false positives, which as I understand it, have to isolate.
In the blog post we see Prof Leitch, Scotland’s high heidjun, choose an example of 50% prevalence, thereby ducking the actual problem.

He also confused Sars2 (the virus) with covid-19 (the disease) - as he regularly does.
As the blog notes, the error rate can generate a casedemic on its own.

The blog’s pretty polite - finishing with:
“How can Prof Leitch tell the difference between a true pandemic and a false positive pandemic?”

Well if he doesn’t know the difference between a 1 in 1000 chance and a 50/50 - let alone between the virus and the disease - he can’t.

**
New analysis of lateral flow tests shows specificity of at least 99.9%
Link: New analysis of lateral flow tests shows specificity of at least 99.9% - GOV.UK

The error rate (1 in a 1000) conveniently highlights the limit of usefulness of the test.
There should be a warning to health professionals - DO NOT USE WHEN THE PREVALENCE OF THE DISEASE IS NEAR THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE.

1 Like
#18

Vernon Coleman’s latest, in which he uses the official figures to show how a large number of people are being killed and seriously injured by these vaccines…