Regulatory changes and processes are usually a bit gummy to read through.
This update from James Roguski has a handy potted version - a Some Animals are More Equal than Others’ moment in the making:
"The proposed changes to the first principle in Article 3 of the International Health Regulations pretty much says it all. If adopted, they would strike out the following text:
with the full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons ”
and replace it with…well essentially, a tub of blancmange:
“Below is a screenshot of the proposed amendment:”
"The International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) has been meeting in secret over the past two months. Despite their secrecy, it can be deduced that they were working to compile proposed amendments that had been submitted from 16 countries into a single document.
As an alternative to the authoritarian overreach of the document below, I STRONGLY SUGGEST that readers visit ThePeoplesAmendments.com to see what our delegates should have proposed.
Top Ten Reasons to Reject The Proposed AMendments the International Health Regulations"
These ten reasons highlighted by Roguski include Dictatorial (and state-bypassing) Powers to WHO individuals - likely unelected pharma and conglomerate stooges - and stuff about Health Certificates, identifying likely ‘disease carriers’ (in the context of being unvaccinated of course).
Your (likely) first thought is probably right - you don’t really need to read it - just know that it’s going on, generally unpublicized.
I wonder how these technocrat half-wits think they’re going to get away with just setting up some fancy front outfit like the - now thoroughly-captured - WHO, complete with fully-purchased Tedroid goodthinker staff, and then, this Clod Hall gets to tell us all what we must and mustn’t do - or think.
Wholly without benefit of popular plebiscite, of course! Zero ‘advice and consent’ from the mere plebs needed. Oh god yes, that’s bound to be a sure-fire runner innit? (Not)
Odd, isn’t it, how people can sport higher-than-average IQs, plus all the supposed ‘advantages’ of a modern primary-secondary-tertiary ‘education’, and yet still be such utter, utter prats? I think of it as The Raine Paradox, dear June being so bright and educated and superlatively confident, and yet still able to be such a prize prat; without ever noticing, natch.
Bring it on, pillocks, and let’s see how well you do! Don’t you realise yet that too many disillusioned people are on to you…?
I think we can see how they think they can get away with it.
“Bring it on, pillocks”. (Pill boxes?)
If only it were ‘on’. “Sneak it on” - or under the table, more like.
It can only work if most people are fast asleep - oh wait…
We’re going to save thousands of deaths and billions of dollars - using a targeted bivalent booster campaign.
Dr Meryl Nass comments: “wtf?”
But this is the the legislative body of the US of A.
At least it is, until you get to No. 8 - the bit where they pass control to the WHO.
Of course the GICs will retain control, as they own the WHO as well - and say their hands are tied by treaty.
Dr Nass has a proposition
Here is how we exit the WHO
Sounds like the right kind of idea. But note the byline:
" A bill to do so (its short name was ‘WHO Withdrawal Act’) was introduced in June last year but went nowhere"
So, she says, quite rightly:
However, this time the bill needsmassive grassroots supportand to be attached to a spending bill that cannot be vetoed by the President, such as the bill to raise the cap on federal spending, which will be due very early in the 2023 (118th) session of Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7931/text
Opposition is at least alive and kicking in the US. Not sure it’s so advanced in European countries.
Never underestimate the stupidity of such, otherwise, “clever” people. We get the government we deserve though (I become more of this opinion as I get older), .
“What happened to him?”
“He said ; “think outside the box”!”
“Yeah?” “To the cat!”
