5 Filters

Why I don’t believe there ever was a Covid virus By Dr Mike Yeadon

Why I don’t believe there ever was a Covid virus By Dr Mike Yeadon

March 22, 2023

I’VE grown increasingly frustrated about the way debate is controlled around the topic of origins of the alleged novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, and I have come to disbelieve it’s ever been in circulation, causing massive scale illness and death. Concerningly, almost no one will entertain this possibility, despite the fact that molecular biology is the easiest discipline in which to cheat. That’s because you really cannot do it without computers, and sequencing requires complex algorithms and, importantly, assumptions. Tweaking algorithms and assumptions, you can hugely alter the conclusions.

This raises the question of why there is such an emphasis on the media storm around Fauci, Wuhan and a possible lab escape. After all, the ‘perpetrators’ have significant control over the media. There’s no independent journalism at present. It is not as though they need to embarrass the establishment. I put it to readers that they’ve chosen to do so.

So who do I mean by ‘they’ and ‘the perpetrators? There are a number of candidates competing for this position, with their drug company accomplices, several of whom are named in Paula Jardine’s excellent five-part series for TCW, Anatomy of the sinister Covid project. High on the list is the ‘enabling’ World Economic Forum and their many political acolytes including Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Ardern.

But that doesn’t answer the question why are they focusing on the genesis of the virus. In my view, they are doing their darnedest to make sure you regard this event exactly as they want you to. Specifically, that there was a novel virus.

I’m not alone in believing that myself at the beginning of the ‘pandemic’, but over time I’ve seen sufficient evidence to cast strong doubt on that idea. Additionally, when considered as part of a global coup d’état, I have put myself in the position of the most senior, hidden perpetrators. In a Q&A, they would learn that the effect of a released novel pathogen couldn’t be predicted accurately. It might burn out rapidly. Or it might turn out to be quite a lot more lethal than they’d expected, demolishing advanced civilisations. Those top decision-makers would, I submit, conclude that this natural risk is intolerable to them. They crave total control, and the wide range of possible outcomes from a deliberate release militates against this plan of action: ‘No, we’re not going to do this. Come back with a plan with very much reduced uncertainty on outcomes.’

The alternative I think they’ve used is to add one more lie to the tall stack of lies which has surrounded this entire affair. This lie is that there has ever been in circulation a novel respiratory virus which, crucially, caused massive-scale illness and deaths. In fact, there hasn’t.

Instead, we have been told there was this frightening, novel pathogen and ramped up the stress-inducing fear porn to 11, and held it there. This fits with cheating about genetic sequences, PCR test protocols (probes, primers, amplification and annealing conditions, cycles), ignoring contaminating genetic materials from not only human and claimed viral sources, but also bacterial and fungal sources. Why for example did they need to insert the sampling sticks right into our sinuses? Was it to maximise non-human genetic sequences?

Notice the soft evidence that our political and cultural leaders, including the late Queen, were happy to meet and greet one another without testing, masking or social distancing. They had no fear. In the scenario above, a few people would have known there was no new hazard in their environment. If there really was a lethal pathogen stalking the land, I don’t believe they’d have had the courage or the need to act nonchalantly and risk exposure to the virus.

Most convincingly for me is the US all-cause mortality (ACM) data by state, sex, age and date of occurrence, as analysed by Denis Rancourt and colleagues. The pattern of increased ACM is inconsistent with the presence of a novel respiratory virus as the main cause.

If I’m correct that there was no novel virus, what a genius move it was to pretend there was! Now they want you only to consider how this ‘killer virus’ got into the human population. Was it a natural emergence (you know, a wild bat bit a pangolin and this ended up being sold at a wet market in Wuhan) or was it hubristically created by a Chinese researcher, enabled along the way by a researcher at the University of North Carolina funded by Fauci, together making an end run around a presidential pause on such work? Then there’s the question as to whether the arrival of the virus in the general public was down to carelessness and a lab leak, or did someone deliberately spread it?

I also need to point out that the perpetrators have hermetic control of the mass media via a Big Tech and government stranglehold documented in part here, here and here. That’s why they’ve found it so easy to censor people like me. If a story appears on multiple TV networks, it’s because they’re either OK with it or it has been actively planted. It won’t be genuine. They never tell the truth. I don’t think they’ve told the truth since this coup began and probably much earlier. Most so-called journalists have lost sight of what truth ever was.

I believe that the perpetrators (who could be all or any of Gates, Fauci, Farrar, Vallance, CEPI, EcoHealth Alliance, DARPA and numerous others) planted the controversy about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 because a little embarrassment of the establishment was a small price to persuade most of us that there surely must be a novel virus when there isn’t. (And they have got away with it to date.)

I have colleagues who do not believe what we’ve been told (i.e. that a virus has been experimentally constructed) is even possible technologically. I don’t have the background to assess that idea. But the rest hangs together for me in a way that no other explanation does.

To this point, an ex-pharmaceutical industry executive Sasha Latypova, speaking with Robert F Kennedy Jr on his podcast of last Thursday, March 16, describes the extensive evidence of the contracts and relationships that were in place before the Covid era. Contracts were signed for billions of dollars in February 2020. Not only would the required production never happen (from a standing start, to sign such a large commitment is ridiculous) but it cannot be done. She estimated that approximately one kilogram of DNA was required. There isn’t that much medicinal grade DNA on the planet at any one time. That’s because it’s hard to do, very expensive, wholly bespoke and difficult to store for long periods. Also, the amounts of any specific DNA sequence required and held in store by commercial suppliers would be milligrams or perhaps grams at a stretch. So it was always completely unfeasible, regardless of how much money was thrown at the problem, to have accomplished what they claim to have done in a short time.

Consequently, no other conclusion is supported by the facts than that it’s a huge crime, extensively planned. In itself, that rules out a natural emergence of a pathogen, unless divine providence occurred. Logically we’re left with a leak or, as I argue, a lie plus a PsyOp. The former may or may not be possible, but what isn’t arguable is that something like this could be done and would be likely to run smoothly, with a real pathogen. Almost any outcome but the one presumably wanted is likely if a pathogen is released. I can reach no other conclusion than that it’s fake.

In closing, I’m not saying people weren’t sick or that they didn’t die in huge numbers. I’m arguing only about the causes of illnesses and deaths. People were made sick and some killed by all the pre-existing causes, amplified by fear, resulting in immunosuppression and then a host of revolting actions. Note even the official overlap of signs and symptoms of ‘Covid-19’ and existing illnesses. Notably, they chopped antibiotic prescriptions in the US by 50 per cent during 2020. They ensured large numbers of frail elderly people were mechanically ventilated, a procedure which, in such subjects, is close to contraindicated. Some were administered remdesivir, which is a poison for the kidneys. In care homes, they were given midazolam and morphine, respiratory depressant drugs which in combination are all but contraindicated in patients with breathing difficulties. If used, close monitoring is required, most usually automated alarm systems attached to vital cardiorespiratory monitoring, including fingertip monitoring for blood gases. That didn’t happen in care homes.

I believe the main reason for the lies about the novel virus is a desire for total predictability and control, with the clearly articulated intention of transforming society; beginning by dismantling the financial system through lockdowns and furlough, while the immediate practical goal of lockdown was to provide the causus belli for injecting as many people as possible with materials designed not to induce immunity, but to demand repeat inoculation, to cause injury and death, and to control freedom of movement. I’m sure they’re pretty content with getting at least one needle into 6,000,000,000 people.

Note that though an estimated 10-15million have been killed with poisonous ‘vaccines’, these are the but first of many mRNA injections to come. The indications are that ways to force you to accept ten more have been anticipated, because that’s the number of doses your government has agreed to purchase. Purchasing what? Well, it’s already been mooted that all existing vaccines are to be reformatted as mRNA types. If this happens, I don’t believe anyone injected ten more times is likely to escape death or severe, life-limiting illnesses. Inducing your body to manufacture non-self proteins will axiomatically induce an autoimmune attack by your own body. Your disease will be related to where the injected dose goes and of course the consistency of that injected product. They’ve been horribly erratic so far. It’s not certain they ever could have been made and launched if they had been subject to the usual quality requirements and not granted ’emergency use’ authorisations. Of course, as we now know, the regulators played an important role beyond lying for the US military, the organisation which made the original orders for ‘vaccines’, and set all the contractual conditions for companies such as Moderna and Pfizer.

The chickens are coming home to roost right now in the banking system.

As I always say, I cannot know much for sure. I don’t have a copy of the script of this, the greatest crime in history. But, whatever Covid actually is, I don’t believe that what was called influenza disappeared conveniently in early 2020. It’s another lie. It’s what they do. It’s all they do.

To those who sense that all is not well but are unwilling to make the psychological leap to the diabolical world I believe we’re now living in, I point out the asymmetry of risk. If you follow the official narrative and I’m right, you and your children will lose all your freedoms and probably your lives. If you believe what I’m saying and I’m wrong, you’ll be laughed at. These options aren’t faintly balanced. A rational actor should cease believing what we’re being told. It’s not a safe position, keeping your counsel and your head down. It’s the most dangerous thing you could do.

4 Likes

Am convinced it was accidental release.

There’s the vape deaths that presented as covid in x-rays, the location of the bio lab and the deaths in nursing homes etc. Then there’s the fact that the Wuhan military games team was about 70 miles away. Yanks do triple that for ice cream. Then there was the very suspicious female competitor whose prior track record was abysmal.

We also have the issue of Iran and China both facing a rather nasty version of something yet elsewhere it’s quite benign

Sure, L, something criminally nasty was being done to most of the people who died unnecessarily. But it wasn’t by a ‘novel virus’. In the first place, no-one - literally no-one - can produce a purified, fully-Koched, fully identified physical sample of this alleged ‘virus’; just computer GIGO, nothing more.

What seems to have happened is that seasonal flu was hijacked and repurposed as the dreadful bogey-thing that was going to kill us all; in other words, it was a propaganda pandemic, with wilful - if widely doublethunk - murders of certain vulnerable groups, who were herded deliberately into killing situations; nothing more than that.

And yes, one of those groups was Iranian parliamentarians, who were attacked with - well something known to be nasty - but not covid, because no-one has yet proven its existence.

In the second place, there’s the awkward unintended consequence that the very existence of ‘viruses’ as a category of real things has been brought back into serious questioning again, after a long period of quietude; and the objections of the sceptics to ‘virus’ theory haven’t been answered in any even threshold-convincing way, and are being dodged by the virology establishment, with hand-waving and nothing more.

And in the third place, there’s that sterling All-Cause-Mortality analysis done by Denis Rancourt and colleagues, which demonstrates starkly that the death patterns, including the widely-seen steep spikes immediately the scamdemic was announced in March 2020, simply can’t be fitted into an even marginally credible ‘pandemic’ explanation. ‘Pandemics’ which stop at juridical boundaries, which kill extensively within one jurisdiction, and not at all within a directly contiguous jurisdiction with different responses to the PHEIC announcement, are not, cannot be, pandemics, but wilful mass killings - disguised as ‘pandemics’ by propaganda.

And the fourth issue is the massive illness and death laid on whole populaces by the measures alleged to be necessary to ‘contain the pandemic’. These will probably turn out in time to have been almost as lethal as the poison-stabs, which of course also inflicted a whole other wave of deaths, permanent maimings, and other damage as soon as they were foisted on us.

My estimate of the situation now is as Mike’s: there never was a ‘pandemic’, because there is no ‘novel virus’ pathogen on the rampage.

This whole three year episode - and still counting - has demonstrated with unprecedented starkness the extraordinary stampeding and manipulation power of modern, fully-captured media machines, together with the indoctrination and career-fear capture of the (always above-average IQ, please note!) useful-idiot technocrat class, who are always fatally susceptible to programming with whatever intellectual-theory balloons are currently fashionable, natch; it’s what nature’s nerds are good at, after all.

All this ably assisted by the most modern techniques of applied-psychology/advertising, as now used daily by the manipulators to inject into us their tissue of manipulative lies - mainly through the lamestream ‘news’ flows.

My, haven’t we come a long way since some of us were first active in Medialens’s comments section, followed by Doctor dan’s - as it turned out - rather untrustworthy lifeboat; followed by this little coterie of serious - but open-minded :smile: - sceptics here at 5F!

Still subjecting the media and orthodox doctrines generally to some serious questioning; yet still sloughing people who keep falling at the first serious fence, when some cherished belief-item finally gets called out. ‘Climate emergency’, for example…

Difficult work, innit? :smile:

3 Likes

Rhis, you (and we) know there is no such thing as SARS-COV-2 or any other 'virus for that matter. We struggle to take seriously anyone who woffles about lab leaks, natural origins, gains of function - bollocks is the new bollocks, shite is the new shite. We salute your patience and politeness dealing with idiots. But what if they’re not idiots but just doing their jobs?

M & I spent a while recently discussing the likelihood of ‘Dan’ having been placed prior to the plandemic rollout which, after all, has been in the pipeline for many many years. He played a blinder with his victim status and his expert professional status backing his techniques of emotional blackmail, manipulation and plain good ol’ fashioned online bullying to sort out the lefties on TLN on behalf of the biosecurity state. . . not that most of ‘us’ needed sorting out of course but he made damned sure. Or is he just a drama queen? [can you still say that?]

Of course we came to no definite conclusion but, as with so much these days, we are left wondering. . .

2 Likes

That would need to have been at least 15 years prior to the p(l)andemic, as that’s how long he was on ML. And for all of that time he was a nobody, like everyone else there, until the ML board folded.
And all to lead a few men and a dog astray - do you really suspect such long term planning and foresight?
Also he met with ML-ers a few times.

1 Like

Alan, I was having a very similar conversation with a - well-clued-in - neighbour on precisely this issue, just today.

I was putting the position that there’s a whole class-segment of our populace who are, because of their nerdish ability to jump through all the right ‘educational’ - read indoctrinational - hoops from age about six, up to the PhD mid-twenties, and who, because of their further aptitude for regurgitating their indoctrination at the drop of a hat (thus passing all the right formal AND social examinations with ease), therefore consider themselves to know, inherently, more about their particular discipline than the lay public could possibly grasp; and who are therefore entitled to take the extra - fatal - step of believing that they know better than we hoi-polloi how to respond to world issues in general - because of their ‘superior’ intellectual grasp; and that therefore, they should have management control of things over and above whatever blundering inputs we mere plebs might want to inject.

We were considering the stark contrast between the frankly near-criminal irresponsibility of behaviour that lots of medical and other ‘qualified’ professionals have shown during the covid swindle, and the simply top-quality medical service that I’ve been receiving, whereby my particular team of helpers has probably saved both me and my ninety-one-year-old buddy from imminent death, by the replacement heart-valves, stents and pace-makers that they gave us - in quite something of a priority hurry, it’s become clear. We were at serious risk…

I can’t fault the quality of the help I’ve received; and my mate Eric was told franlky by the surgeon who inserted his two valves and three stents - sic! - that he would have died soon without them; worn out natural heart gear…

My hunch is that a lot of the technocrat class - who have indeed behaved with serious, often fatal, irresponsibility - have done so not because they’re secret-state manipulator plants, but because they’re living the lives of (higher-than-average IQ) useful-idiots, supremely easily manipulated and stampeded by crafty amoral cynics precisely because of their higher-than-average aptitude for imbibing indoctrination easily and without ever being the awkward buggers who are always asking embarrassing questions at precisely the ‘wrong’ time; in other words, overly-trusting, easily-gic-conned nerds still, with too little inherent street-savvy scepticism. And far too much grovelling career-fear as well…

‘Pathetic Sharks’ (cf ‘Viz’ magazine fame) in other words. I suspect that dan falls into this category, rather than being a cynical agent of illicit social power. As Evvy points out, he’s been in this line of - supposedly - sceptical inquiry and dissent since ML days, and usually just as one of the crowd. I doubt that realworld little human farties - us, in general, and most especially the hyper-credulous nerds - are really up to that sort of elevated craftiness, outside the shallow fictional world of bondian entertainment moonshine…

What continues to surprise me, is the number of the hoi-polloi class who see right through all the BS. Maybe it’s just the arrogance of those fortunate enough to have been better educated or earn a higher income that makes them blind to the truth hidden in plain sight. Perhaps, that was Dan, doctor knows best and swallow the pill or else.

That said, @AlanG has every right to question. Let’s face the fact that the deep state plays a long game. One only has to look at captured agencies, the media, captured NGO’s, and things like the Rockefeller “Lock Step” document 10 years before lock-step came into play. All part of the long game. As you always say, ‘keep an open mind’.

1 Like

Hi folks, I was re-running the argument with a friend about what caused the illnesses in 2020 outside the normal seasonal period of respiratory infections. I put forward the Zach Bush and Virus Mania hypothesis that this was a combination of external factors :

  • atmospheric pollution in particular areas like Wuhan and Lombardy (cities of Bergamo and Brescia in particular) but articles like this Guardian article suggests Bergamo & Brescia and Verona numbers don’t support the pollution argument:

although there could be confounding factors which impacted the infection numbers ( the Guardian points to population density being far higher in B&B versus Verona) but at the same time the age distribution of the population of those three areas in Italy all have 65+ at around 22%.

  • the cocktail of drugs taken by large swathes of people Zach Bush thought that the heart and vascular medicine that increased ace2 receptors made the body more vulnerable to nano particulate matter that combined with viral material which more easily attached to ace2 receptors - like “corona virus”?! But there is no way to pin these elements to Italian towns for comparison without detailed data. ( I think ZB believes there are viruses but doesn’t believe they are harmful or pathogenic they are merely part of nature’s way of passing information around. )

  • Bush also raised the issue of glyphosate and other insecticides in the environment which could impact the body - again we can’t pin this factor down to particular towns in Italy.

However I did pick up some interesting comments from dr. Stefano Scoglio one of the authors of Virus Mania here:

The Viral delusion

episode 1

1hr 23 mins in
to paraphrase:
problem is people stopped testing for influenza and only tested for covid – hence flu disappeared in 2020!

Also in Wuhan they were injecting people with flu vaccines in 2019 – testing the vaccines for China in Wuhan.

Also problems in Bergamo and Brescia – neighbouring towns north east of Milan – major problems of pollution and also there were 185000 vaccinations for flu and 80,000 for another disease (meningococcal vaccine ) at the same time in the 2 areas around 2 months before covid erupted.

Plus there are 72000 articles on pubmed for drug induced pneumonias – all the main anti-inflammatory drugs including aspirin ibuprofin statins and amniolaziprole(?) cardio vascular drugs and even mono-clonal anti-bodies proposed as a cure for covid - cause pneumonias like covid.

In the past with such pneumonias you were not taken to hospital and intubated for ventilater treatment or essentially killed as you are now!

See below a comment from an american pediatrician on side effects of flu jabs ( I mentioned the flu jab issue as a possibility some time ago just as another thought outside the box ):

( “ Rapid response to:

Preventing a covid-19 pandemic

BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m810 (Published 28 February 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;368:m810

Rapid Response:

Flu shots and the risk of coronavirus infections

Important editorial notice for readers: This is a rapid response (online comment by a third party) and not an article in The BMJ. It is attributed in a misleading way on certain websites and social media. The Editor, 30/09/2020.

Dear Editor

John Watkins is right; we need to think beyond containment, but he overlooks the possibility that seasonal flu shots are potential contributors to the current outbreak. (BMJ 2020;398:m810—February 28)….A randomized placebo-controlled trial in children showed that flu shots increased fivefold the risk of acute respiratory infections caused by a group of noninfluenza viruses, including coronaviruses. (Cowling et al, Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:1778) From Table 3, vaccine recipients had 20 noninfluenza virus-positive ARIs and 19 virus-negative ARIs; non-recipients had 3 noninfluenza virus-positive ARIs and 14 virus-negative ARIs. These figures yield an odds ratio of 4.91 (CI 1.04 to8.14).

Such an observation may seem counterintuitive, but it is possible that influenza vaccines alter our immune systems non-specifically to increase susceptibility to other infections; this has been observed with DTP and other vaccines. (Benn et al, Trends in Immunology, May 2013) There are other immune mechanisms that might also explain the observation.

To investigate this possibility, a case-control study is in order as we study and care for the victims of covid-19. Influenza vaccines have become sacred cows in some quarters, but they shouldn’t be.

ALLAN S. CUNNINGHAM 2 March 2020

Competing interests: No competing interests

02 March 2020

Allan S. Cunningham

Retired pediatrician

Cooperstown NY 13326, USA crabarbicus62@gmail.com

cheers

PS sorry this is all over the place but it does represent how many of us will be thinking about all this stuff!

1 Like

But thanks for your factcheck anyway.

1 Like