Interesting - some would say damning - revelations.
It’s not a very long read, if you don’t check out the links
ED
Was Covid Always a CIA Plot?
2 Likes
Hi @Evvy_dense another way of looking at this article is to note that there is no discussion of the increasing evidence that viral pathogens that can be transmitted through the air is not possible - Professor John Gildea ( Zach Bush’s mate) made this discovery whilst working for the DOD in the US; and Rancourt’s team point to the statistical evidence ( using official statistics) proving there is no possibility of a transmissable viral pathogen causing peaks in deaths in 2020.
When virology is under attack someone may have thought it a good idea to claim (without evidence mind you) “covid” existed because it was created - just a thought.
cheers
5 Likes
“Covid” devastated the world in the early twenties after the “virus”, “SARS-Cov-2”, spread from China by accident (Kyle’s dad shagging pangolin etc.) (original official mainstream)
“Covid” ditto but first engineered in a laboratory by horrible US/Chinese bioweapon people (Baric, bat lady etc.) (still accidental escape/maybe deliberate release) (original alternative mainstream)
Mainstream military-grade psy-opery x2
4 Likes
Hi @CJ1 . Even if John Gildea is right about viral transmission by air being impossible, if somehow everyone was being fooled before covid, would they not then be likely to continue being fooled the same way during covid!?
Meanwhile the information posed in the article reveals the intense scheming by those at the head of the scientific community and the small group of scientists like Ralph Baric to be prepared for the next ‘pandemic’ - prepared to profit, that is.
Of course that’s not new - but the point that the article reveals is that, whatever this was, the CIA seem to have been in on this from the beginning. If so, they were probably driving it. Another implication of CIA oinvolvement might be that the stakes were higher than the usual medical racketeering and grubby financial motives.
With this demonstration of criminals’ activity it strikes me as tangential to focus on the knowledege gaps which must exist if people like Gildea or Zach Bush or the Baileys are right.
(I say ‘or’ because they seem to have different theories?)
I’m not saying anyone is wrong as I don’t have the knowledge to refute biological claims, but there is surely a vast body of scientific phenomena, going back decades, that need to be explained or re-evaluated, in order to show that the new theory is or can be valid?
Meanwhile…should the population at large let the crims dodge justice and accountability while a small group tries to persuade the world there has been a technical error in the details of the theory? (which might for all we know be correctible) It seems to me, that the criminal behaviour and scheming, ongoing and escalating as it seems to be, would still be, by orders of magnititude, the more immediate and urgent priority.
To put it another way, the article doesn’t depend on decades of virus theory and practice being completely correct, just a plausible model of disease that is so widely accepted that a new ‘virus’ (real or fake) would, in the prevalent conditions, have every chance of allowing TPTB to get away with measures as we saw during covid to exert and tighten control over the population.
This doesn’t mean that those with alternative theories have to STFU - far from it! But people going after the crims should not be the target of no-virus type theories! In my view, if no-virusers are serious they need to go after the academics - who, after all, are the ones opposing them.
Maybe the no-virusers will have a spectacular success at some point and bring down a whole crumbling edifice of lies and academic cowardice going back decades. But I don’t think those currently in pursuit of the crims should wait for this day - nor do I think they need to. But they do need to focus on the right targets, as per their particular grievances. As we all need to 
Cheers
3 Likes