From Telegram;
IMPORTANT: VOTER FRAUD IN ROMANIA SINCE DECADES!?
I read that Simion lost in Romania because: “There are roughly 2 million urban voters that come out during the second round and they always vote against either the socialists (PSD) or the populist-nationalists”
When I read that I was mesmerized, for me it actually proved voter fraud by the EU for decades in Romania!
It looks like a standard scheme by the EU bureaucracy to ensure the EU centre wins in Romania and the country does not change course.
I checked the elections in Romania since 1992 and they had one pattern:
- The political direction changes with every election between left, right, center
- The voter turnout always decreases after the first round. It’s obvious since there are less candidates to vote for and no new candidates appear.
Then Romania joins NATO (2004) and the EU (2007), the confrontation with Russia begins (and the country is strategically located for that).
We see a new pattern in Romanian voting:
- The political direction always stays the same, always EU centre wins
- The voter turnout starts to increase in the second round, what ensures that the EU center candidate wins.
To be blunt, The EU adds new votes to the second round to ensure their candidate wins!
If you remove the voter turnout increase, which did not existed before the accession to the EU, they would lose! The country would have continued its natural course of switching left, right and center candidates. But this magic voter increase in the last moment ensures the EU wins! Every time!
Let’s look at the election results since the collapse of the Soviet union.
1992: Leading candidate wins second round
- Voter turnout:
first round
- 76.29%
- 12,496,430 votes
second round:
- 73.23%
- 12,153,810 votes
3% decrease of voters
- Ion Iliescu - left
first round:
- 5,633,465 votes
- 47.34%
second round: - 7,393,429 votes
- 61.43%
difference:
- 14.09%
- 1,759,964 votes
- Emil Constantinescu - center
first round:
- 3,717,006 votes
- 31.24%
second round: - 4,641,207
- 38.57%
Difference
- 924,201 votes
- 7.33%
Summary: In 1992 the existing voters disperse among the two candidates of the second round.
3%, who do not have a candidate to vote for in the second round, do not vote at all, so the voter turnout actually decreases.
Left wins.
1996: leading candidate loses in second round, left loses, switch of political direction
- Voter turnout:
first round
- 76.01%
- 13,088,388 votes
- 435,481 invalid votes
second round:
- 75.90%
- 13,078,883 votes
- 106,398 invalid votes
0.11% decrease
- Ion Iliescu - left
first round:
- 4,081,093 votes
- 32.25%
second round: - 5,914,579
- 45.59%
difference:
- 1,833,486 votes
- 13.34%
- Emil Constantinescu - center
first round:
- 3,569,941 votes
- 28.21%
second round:
- 7,057,906 votes
- 54.41%
Difference
- 3,487,965 votes
- 26.20%
Summary: The voter turnout does not increase and the voters disperse towards the two candidates.
Mostly go to the center-right wing.
The first round candidate loses in second round.
Political direction changes, center won, left lost
2000: Leading candied wins, political direction switch, he was president before. Nothing unusual.
- Voter turnout:
first round
- 65.31%
- 11,559,458 votes
- 346,484 invalid votes
second round:
- 57.50%
- 10,184,715 votes
- 163,845 invalid votes
7.81% decrease of voters
- Ion Iliescu - left
first round:
- 4,076,273 votes
- 36.35%
second round: - 6,696,623 votes
- 66.83%
difference:
- 2,620,350 votes
- 30.48%
- Corneliu Vadim Tudor - right
first round:
- 3,178,293 votes
- 28.34%
second round:
- 3,324,247 votes
- 33.17%
Difference
- 145,954
- 4.83%
Summary: The voter turnout does not increase, but decreases and the remaining voters disperse towards the two candidates.
Mostly go to the left wing, leading candidate wins.
Political direction changes, left won, right lost, center lost
2004: Romania joins NATO and will join the EU in 2007.
The last election without meddling. During this term the EU implements its voting system.
- Voter turnout:
first round
- 58.49%
- 10,791,215 votes
- 339,010 invalid votes
second round:
- 55.21%
- 10,111,559 votes
- 103,245 invalid votes
3.27% decrease
- Traian Băsescu - centre
first round:
- 3,545,236 votes
- 33.92%
second round: - 5,126,794 votes
- 51.23%
difference:
- 1,581,558 votes
- 17,31%
- Adrian Năstase - left:
- 4,278,864 votes
- 40.94%
second round:
- 4,881,520 votes
- 48.77%
Difference
- 602,656 votes
- 7,83%
Summary: The voter turnout does not increase, but decreases and the voters disperse towards the two candidates.
Mostly go to the center, leading candidate loses.
Political direction changes left lost, center won.
From now on, the center always wins and the voter turnout never decreases!
That is statistically not probable.
2009: Romania joined NATO and the EU previously.
Candidates alternated between left, center and right every election. Normal democratic process.
But now we see the voter turnout increase always in the second round. This is unnatural!
Voter turnout decreased always before that since there are less candidates to vote for, until the EU came in!
Further this is the point where USA declared Ukraine and Georgia need to join NATO too and the conflation. With Russia begins!
Without voter increase the EU candidate would have lost here.
- Voter turnout:
first round
- 54.37%
- 9,946,286 votes
- 227,446 invalid votes
second round:
- 58.02%
- 10,620,044 votes
- 138,476 invalid votes
+ 3,65% increase!!!
- Traian Băsescu - centre
first round:
- 3,153,640 votes
- 32.45%
second round: - 5,275,808 votes
- 50.33%
difference:
- 2,122,168 votes
- 17.88%
- Mircea Geoană - left:
- 3,027,838 votes
- 31.15%
second round:
- 5,205,760 votes
- 49.67%
Difference
- 2,177,922
- 18.52%
Summary: The voter turnout increase for the first time, so we have new voters coming in after the first round.
We also have for the first time no change in political direction, centre stays at power.
First election since Romania joined NATO and the EU, and the condor with Russia began via Georgia and Ukraine.
It certainly statistically looks like the EU did not want to risk anything and threw in 3.65% to ensure their candidate wins.
If your polls are accurate, you can predict the amount of needed extra votes.
2014: Voter turnout increases even more.
Candidates do not alternate anymore the center wins now always.
In 2014 the USA and the EU coupes in Ukraine and overthrew the elected government. USA’s Nuland famously picked the Ukrainian government and said “fuck the EU”
So, why would they not interfere here?
Without voter increase the EU candidate would have lost here.
- Voter turnout:
first round
- 53.18%
- 9,946,286 votes
- 237,761 invalid votes
second round:
- 64.11%
- 11,719,263 votes
- 166,111 invalid votes
+10.93% increase!!! (additional 1,772,977 votes)
- Klaus Iohannis - centre
first round:
- 2,881,406 votes (historically low)
- 30.38%
second round: - 6,288,769 votes
- 54.43%
difference:
- 3.407.363 votes (more than double)
- 24.05%
- Victor Ponta - left:
- 3,836,093 votes
- 31.15%
second round:
- 5,205,760 votes
- 40.44%
Difference
- 1.342.667
- 9.29%
Summary: No change in political direction, voter turnout increased by 10.93%.
If we remove the voter increase of 1,772,977 votes from the winning pro EU candidate, we would have a normal election result which fits into the elections before Romania joined the EU.
The election before 2004 showed a normal tendency of switching the political direction in the election, this stopped.
Now we also have a voters increase in the second round, which as previously stated come to the second round out to vote for the EU candidate.
Looks like voter fraud.
2019: Voter turnout increase observed again, political direction does not alternate anymore, the center wins now always.
- Voter turnout:
first round
- 51.18%
- 9,359,476 votes
- 142,961 invalid votes
second round:
- 54.86%
- 10,031,705 votes
- 182,648 invalid votes
+3.66% increase
- Klaus Iohannis - centre
first round:
- 3,485,292 votes
- 37.82%
second round: - 6,509,135 votes
- 66.09%
difference:
- 3,023,843 votes
- 28.27%
- Viorica Dăncilă - left:
- 2,051,725 votes
- 22.26%
second round:
- 3,339,922 votes
- 33.91%
Difference
- 1.288.197
- 11.65%
Summary: No change in political direction, voter turnout increased by 3.66%.
This looks line the popular candidate won, since the first round was extremely low for the left and right anyway, there was no other candidate worth voting for.
But they threw in couple of percent to maintain the statistics, so it does not look weird.
If heh election is not emotional, 7% of voters could have left after the first round and the additional EU 10% would increase the voter turnout by 3%.
2024: The cancelled election!
If you look at the first round, we don’t have clear leading candidates at all.
It becomes unpredictable, but let’s assume that all non center would clump together in the second round.
We would form a non EU block, led by the cancelled Georgescu:
Georgescu - 2,120,401 votes
Ciolacu - 1,769,760 votes
Simion - 1,281,325 votes
Geoana - 583,898 votes
5,755,384 votes
The EU block:
Lasconi - 1,772,500 votes
Ciucă - 811,952 votes
2,584,425 votes
They have a system in place to get up to 2 million votes extra in the second round, via voter turnout increase.
So let’s count that in: 2,584,425 + 2 million votes
The EU centre would be at 4.6 million roughly and that is still a million of votes short to win.
It is obviously oversimplified, but roughly that’s how they calculate.
You can’t assume that all left voters go to Georgescu, but the desire for political change was high in Romania pre 2004 and people wanted to switch direction every election and hence voted for the change candidate.
Now, the EU saw that these numbers are dangerous and did not wanted to risk it, so they cancelled Georgescu.
To be clear, it’s not Georgescu himself that caused this, but the uncertainty of the second round that lead to the election not having a clear favorite.
Georgescu is in Romania for ever, why attack him now? Cause he would have won.
2025: Voter turnout increased by 2 million votes, the center wins again!
Without voter increase the EU candidate would have lost here.
- Voter turnout:
first round
- 53.21%
- 9,571,740 votes
- 141,466 invalid votes
second round:
- 64.72%
- 11,641,866 votes
- 134,171 invalid votes
+11.51% increase
2,070,126 extra votes, 21% extra votes compared to the first round.
This is insane.
- George Simion - right
first round:
- 3,862,761 votes
- 40.96%
second round: - 5,339,053 votes
- 46.40%
difference:
- 1.476.292 votes
- 5.44%
- Nicusor Dan - centre:
- 1,979,767 votes
- 20.99%
second round:
- 6,168,642 votes (tripled the votes. Never happened before)
- 53.60%
Difference
- 4.188.875 votes
- 32.61%
He more than tripled his votes. That never happens. If you remove the 2 million voter increase in the second round, he loses and his numbers look like they should look.
I am measuring against elections before 2004, when candidates alternated and the increases looked moderate. This is just insane and not believable.
Summary: No change in political direction! After cancelling the previous election with Georgescu, since it was shaky for the EU, they got better election setup in the first round.
But they still needed 2,070,126 extra votes, 21% extra votes compared to the first round.
Without voter increase the EU candidate would have lost here.
Simion asked Romanians to verify if any of their dead relatives voted!
He said there are 1,700,000 dead people in the electoral lists.
That’s about the number we saw in the voter turnout increases when it was shaky for the NON EU candidate.
That fits in.
