Sorry to derail the thread
Re Prof Bhakdi’s message. Something kinda interesting about this. I got the gist but not how it related to the three studies. The researchers didn’t point out that their findings meant that the vaccine wasn’t the first man on the moon, as it were. But Bhakdi was on it!
Visnewski: We measured COVID-19 mRNA vaccine induced IgG and IgA in serum serially, up to 145 days post vaccination in 4 subjects. Spike antigen-specific IgG levels rose exponentially and plateaued 21 days after the initial vaccine dose.
Ogata: Clearance of detectable SARS-CoV-2 protein correlated with production of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA)
Amanat: The spike-reactive plasmablast response is dominated by IgG1+ cells and is comprised of a mixture of cells with low and high levels of somatic hypermutation (SHM)
The clue is in those IgG immunoglobulins - if the virus was a new one, they should have been IgMs, and it should have taken a lot longer for those antibodies (which is what these IgG, IgM etc are) to appear.
Did anyone else wonder what the second piece of good news was? He says it is that vaccination is unnecessary - I think it comes from here:
"Wonderfully enough, another publication coming from Denmark showed that true infections with this Sars-Cov2 do exactly the same meaning that everyone who has had an infection - even if they are asymptomatic, no symptoms - the virus just gets into your throat, multiplies a bit and gets thrown out again, your system responds by making IgG and IgE antibodies….this means…fellow citizens, that the herd immunity is already present, but kept under lock and key like a treasure. But it can be mobilized any time you want.
…This virus goes in the front door, and takes days to multiply - days. If it multiplies in your throat it doesn’t matter, it only kills you if it gets to your lungs. But now we know that this is enough time for you, for me or anyone. Over 99% of people have 'the ‘treasure’
Second piece of good news. This will cause vaccination to be unnecessary, but also says that if the vaccination causes any danger it must be stopped. If it only contains danger then it is the duty of the doctors not to do it. "
I think he means that the strength of the immune response in that 99% (quoted by the fourth study, Nielsen) arising from past infections means that the infection rate, or rather the rate of non-resolution, won’t rise much above that 99%.
If this is correct it undermines the ‘herd immunity’ or ‘social duty’ reason so often trotted out to guilt-trip the populace into not taking the experimental vaccine.
That was Bhakdi’s final message - don’t take the vaccine, or any boosters.
Cheers and thanks again to Sanjeev for this find.