I was just going to say what a good article this is. It’s good to see any criticism of Labour from the logsuffering the TUs, so it was quite good to read it from Unison’s newbie leader.
But en route to the keyboard it struck me, rather belatedly, that it pulls some big punches.
Couched in a narrow framework of control freakery, the article warns that
“The Prime Minister should know that this latest act of control freakery was, above all else, a mistake. He cannot afford any more.”
Only a mistake? She might have added that the carefully planned appointment of Blairite brainchild Starmer was a continuation of a longterm project fundamentally aimed at suppressing the poor and working classes, instigated in the 1990s by spiritual leader Blair himself (whose election was similarly engineered by the same powerful financial and geopolitical forces).
She could have gone a lot further. Reform don’t need to be in government to serve billionaires - due to the electoral threat (as they aren’t that far apart anyway) the other two main parties are adjusting so as to compete on Reform’s territory.- which IS to serve billionaires.
On Reform victory Andrea says:
“It would be a global victory for a billionaire-backed ethnonationalist project represented by the administration of Donald Trump, whose contempt for democracy was so brutally demonstrated by the murder of intensive care nurse Alex Pretti by ICE agents.”
Well said but…does this not also apply the election of Starmer in the first place?
Or rather - counting Blair - the second place.
ED
Starmer’s Control Freakery Is a Gift to Reform
By

