5 Filters

UN Biodiversity Summit

"The United Nations Summit on Biodiversity will be convened by the President of the General Assembly on 30 September 2020, at the level of Heads of State and Government under the theme of “Urgent action on biodiversity for sustainable development.”

Our societies are intimately linked with and depend on biodiversity. Biodiversity is essential for people, including through its provision of nutritious food, clean water, medicines, and protection from extreme events. Biodiversity loss and the degradation of its contributions to people jeopardize progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and human wellbeing. The evidence of these connections is clear.

The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the importance of the relationship between people and nature. We are reminded that when we destroy and degrade biodiversity, we undermine the web of life and increase the risk of disease spillover from wildlife to people. Responses to the pandemic provide a unique opportunity for transformative change as a global community. An investment in the health of our planet is an investment in our own future.

The Summit will highlight the crisis facing humanity from the degradation of biodiversity and the urgent need to accelerate action on biodiversity for sustainable development. It will provide an opportunity for Heads of State and Government and other leaders to raise ambition for the development of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework to be adopted at the 15th Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2021. This framework, and its effective implementation, must put nature on a path to recovery by 2030 to meet the SDGs and realize the Vision of “Living in harmony with nature”." Go to: https://www.un.org/pga/75/united-nations-summit-on-biodiversity/ for more and intro. vid…

" New “nature performance bond” to tackle twin sovereign debt and biodiversity crises

Opportunity for creditors and developing countries to redefine new issuance and restructuring of existing sovereign debt around measurable nature and climate outcomes.

A new financial instrument developed by the Finance for Biodiversity Initiative (F4B) could help tackle a growing sovereign debt crisis in developing nations while protecting sensitive ecosystems and biodiversity.

The new instrument – known as a “nature performance bond” (NPB) – complements traditional debt instruments, which collect interest until a fixed maturation date, with a performance scheme focused on measurable economic, nature and climate outcomes. Under the terms of an NPB issuers receive relief on both interest and principal as they achieve agreed nature-based outcomes, such as protecting forests, restoring wetlands, and reducing threats to wildlife.

There would be no restriction on the use of proceeds, although a portion could be invested to achieve the committed nature performance outcomes.

“Historically, nations faced with looming financial crises have been forced into a corner – either default, or lasting damage to their economies, biodiversity, and their people,” said Simon Zadek, Chair of F4B. “As key stakeholders convene for the United Nations Summit on Biodiversity, we hope to flip the script and make debt the driver of ecological conservation and human development, with the help of nature performance bonds.”

NPBs can help to solve the twin crises of swelling sovereign debt and rampant biodiversity loss by creating a bridge between providers of financial capital and biodiversity-rich countries most in need of debt relief. Many of these nations have seen a disproportionate impact from COVID-19 on their economies.

Seven of the 10 countries with the highest number of COVID-19 infections to date are developing economies that were already facing debt distress before the pandemic struck. Declines in local currencies have increased the cost of servicing foreign debt for many, while evaporating demand has robbed tourism- and export-dependent countries of income.

At the same time, many countries have dramatically increased public spending to support their health systems and defend their economies and citizens’ livelihoods. Emerging and developing countries have unveiled rescue packages worth 5.4% of their gross domestic product (GDP), according to the World Bank. This combination of factors has led to government budget deficits ballooning out of control.

Recent months have witnessed the emergence of a growing body of evidence and research making clear the link between nature, climate, and sovereign debt; and also how nature loss is eroding many nations’ capacity to generate the economic activity needed to service and repay sovereign debt. *

Progress on achieving biodiversity targets under NPBs would be monitored and verified, to award appropriately debtors and to assure creditors that they are paying for actual performance.

The bonds would build on use so far in green finance markets of “debt-for-nature” swaps, a thriving market for green “use of proceeds” bonds, and early experiences in SDG-aligned bonds. NPBs are designed to allow for the standardisation that is typically critical for driving scale in capital markets, thus enhancing the attractiveness of such instruments to the private sector. Investors with long investment horizons (such as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds) could find NPBs attractive.

Zadek said: “Although work to secure multilateral agreements has slowed, we can still make this year a ‘super year’ for global environmental action by building nature into sovereign debt markets as a contribution to addressing biodiversity and climate challenges, while alleviating the economic pain of the pandemic in some of the world’s poorest countries.”" https://www.f4b-initiative.net/news/new-“nature-performance-bond”-to-tackle-twin-sovereign-debt-and-biodiversity-crises Consitent with “Emergence Theory”? That’s the test for me…

*Italics mine.

1 Like

Interesting post @GKH. Sadly, I’m far from optimistic that adding new debt instruments is a way out of the (w)hole that we’re currently in.

Debt is a key reason why we are seemingly inexorably linked to the necessity of exponential growth across a key range of areas in the economic realm. Without exponentially growing debt, there would be no need for exponentially chewing and clawing our way through our natural resources. Financialising nature seems to be a way to ignore the actual problem, and solve a different one that doesn’t require any major systemic changes to the framework that is destroying the planet.

That seems unlikely to work…

The globe desperately needs a total debt jubilee, and a reset back to zero. The whole system is in existential danger (quite apart from - though linked to - the existential danger that we face as a multitude of species), and major debt defaults are certain in the not too distant future. This will have immense knock on effects for the state, for currencies, for pensions and social services. Exponentially adding to this problem by creating new debt instruments as a way out of our current predicament seems… well.

Incidentally, I started looking through your piece on the standard deviation. Very interesting! I’ll have a read and get back with some questions/comments.

Cheers
PP

“The globe desperately needs a total debt jubilee, and a reset back to zero” True up to a point…It needs a reset back to “base rate”…that being the level of debt consistent with #Emergence…it goes like this … unsustainable industries impact the environment incurring costs (of all kinds), these are “true debts” in that they must be repaid in order to re-establish the biodiversity that is the engine of sustainability…in other words unsustainable activities must lose their “surplus value” (esp. as no such thing exists!), to the sustainable industries in the form of financial support and payment for the losses already incurred and continuing to be incurred by the continuance of the use of an unsustainable resource…this is done in order to avoid “Year Zero” type shock to the system whilst the transition from unsustainable to sustainable resource base is managed…*

.the calculus of emergence is adequate to the task

  • curve

That’s a nice framing of an important issue. It seems to me, however, that if we allow these true debts to become financial instruments, then speculation takes over and the game is lost.

The only kind of payment that works is payment in kind. If we’ve cut down a tree we have to plant two more. Physical payment for physical problems, or the financial Wizards take over and stochastic calculus rules the day.

Incidentally, what’s the image you’ve used there showing? Looks interesting…

That’s a representation of the tensor calculus principles of emergence…

“The only kind of payment that works is payment in kind. If we’ve cut down a tree we have to plant two more. Physical payment for physical problems, or the financial Wizards take over and stochastic calculus rules the day.”

Which would be fine if transition was not such an issue…the question is how do we transition from reliance on unsustainable resources to use of sustainable resources…as I said “Year Zero” policies are a non starter…firstly they cause Khaos, secondly in order to generate the consensus necessary to both validate and enable a policy of transition the prospect of Khaos must be recognised and rejected…

1 Like

Aha! That’s why it looks like a light ray heading into a black hole! I don’t see the connection to emergence, but it looks very intriguing…

Yeah - the crucial question. Agreed that year-zero policies are too big a shock. I guess that in my mind, there is no way to transition without modifying some fundamental cultural beliefs first. There is no way to sustain the type of society that we have now, complete with rampant corporate capitalism and the billionaire overlords. There is just no way to do that, no matter what kinds of tricks we try and pull. I feel like this realisation is spreading through groups advocating for change, such as XR at the moment.

So, to my mind, the first step is a cultural one. The next set of steps form the bridge from where we are to where we are going, and I see the real role of renewable energy (for example) as a set of stepping stones towards a different type of future. I don’t see renewables as an end in themselves (they won’t ever be able to provide the energy to power our current madness), but a cultural shift, and then a pivot to renewables will allow us to start having the right conversations at least, around what kind of future we can actually build.

Simultaneously, a massive reforestation program, to build carbon sinks of the future, is already underway in China and India. These programs need to be hugely expanded in other parts of the world.

These are the first steps that come to mind, towards the kind of transition that you are talking about. If XR ever get their way on the citizen’s assembly biz, I’m sure that other ideas that facilitate transition will be forthcoming…

A lot to think on. Cheers

PP

PS - all this talk of transition made me wonder whatever happened to the transition town movement? I just wandered over to their website and discovered that the featured article on their website is this one:

Which is all about the centrality of a cultural shift, before we can even begin the work of the techno-industrial shift… It’s a long article and I didn’t read it all, but I thought the emphasis interesting in light of our discussion.

PS talking about light-rays falling into black-holes…They’re in the news!

“Earthshot Prize: Will a £50m Royal ambition save the planet?” asks Sky News “No but it might save the monarchy!”

We put up with this cr*p from his highness’ “crazy” (well bi-polar), father (in the “olden-days”), but for this studied intervention in the proper democratising activities of the body-politic to occur now during The United Nations Summit on Biodiversity (quote; “The Summit will highlight the crisis facing humanity from the degradation of biodiversity and the urgent need to accelerate action on biodiversity for sustainable development. It will provide an opportunity for Heads of State and Government and other leaders to raise ambition for the development of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework to be adopted at the 15th Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2021. This framework, and its effective implementation, must put nature on a path to recovery by 2030 to meet the SDGs and realize the Vision of “Living in harmony with nature”” ), is a real indictment of Britain’s lack of self-awareness and culture. What bl**dy imperialism what hubris! We don’t need another layer of government! Heaven knows “one” has enough difficulty convincing those committed to the International to change their revolutionary ways to evolutionary and enter into the oft painful and difficult (it’s called “effort”), processes of international consensus politics.
As I said we allowed William’s father to pursue his interests when organic practices and environmental concerns were considered fringe (and possibly requiring of a figurehead), but it really is time to govern ourselves now.
Many have warned about sir’s penchant for eugenics and surely “one” would be hard-pushed to find a better example than his support for the hereditary principle of monarchy!!!

Thanks @GKH - I’d not heard of this. I agree with you on the hubris. My real question, though, is how in Gaia’s name are any of the “earth-shots” going to make a difference unless there is a huge shift in the corporatocrazy that is driving us to extinction?

A million pound prize is nice, but what we need is legislation to shift our culture to a less insane one. Without that, the whole notion is almost pointless.

It’s nicely summed up in this quote that I read ages ago:

Even with a million pound prize.

1 Like

I just can’t stand the assumption of power such actions represent…don’t they understand that they will always stand in the way of significant change whilst they cling on to shibboleths such as benign monarchical leadership? They are not “part of the solution” almost all (moot), environmental damage has its roots in inequality (esp. economic), and monarchy represents continuance for the notion that “some animals are more equal than others”…such an attitude is also partial and immensely condescending… It’s dangerous nonsense to maintain otherwise…Sir merely exemplifies the maxim “you only have to scratch a liberal to find the Fascist underneath”…I’ve all the time in the world for his non-political work but Attenborough should stay out of politics…it’s not his field and he should defer to those it is…
…and by “partial” I really do mean that the perspective “Earthshot” exemplifies deals with only a fraction of the issues that we face environmentally as it doesn’t tackle the anachronistic scientific base of the current (redundant), paradigm…a paradigm that must change if humanity is to survive the crisis…you can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear David (and others), please stop trying…you’re screwing things up for people (like myself), who have been working these problems all their lives (and have actually been educated in the relevant fields of study), …

G

1 Like

Excellent points G - can’t disagree with any of it.

Cheers
PP

1 Like

“You are a patron of Population Matters, a problematic organization that states ‘Human population has grown beyond Earth’s sustainable means. We are consuming more resources than our planet can regenerate, with devastating consequences.’ without explaining that capitalism*, overconsumption and other issues discussed below are the key contributors to stopping regeneration.” https://lwpb.net/open-letter-david-attenborough-overpopulation-captialism-fossil-fuels/

*Other “-isms” are also responsible…this is because they are made up of “-ists”…!

1 Like