Not verified by me - even if I could, which clearly has to be an open question for such a claim. But the speaker gives references to follow if you wish.
You have to wonder just how big is the enormity of what’s happening? And - crucially - what percentage of us can actually handle such - apparent - realities without dying of shock, much as Lok does at the end of William Golding’s famous novel ‘The Inheritors’.
Seriously, I think that many of us will handle these possibilities by going into fanatic denial, larded with Stockholm Syndrome: a giant example of Matias Desmet’s ‘Mass Formation’ process of mind-capture:
I saw this, I don’t think it’s right. It’s based on the underreporting rate of Vaers being a factor of ten to a hundred, based on an old study. It takes the ‘times a hundred’ rather the ‘times ten’, and multiplies up across the world. The injuries are serious adverse events. Dr Hodkinson says they are of the order of heart attacks, strokes, pulmonary embolisms (he says ‘emboli’, but he went to Cambridge).
Trouble is, if there are 2 billion of them its a quarter of the population. Everybody would know very many of them, a quarter of the people we know (apart from the unvaxed). Can anybody say this is their experience?
There is stiff resistance to acknowledging vax injuries of course. Pressure on doctors and specialists not to fess up, and most or many have been misled to begin with about safety.
But I don’t imagine the very highest underreported rates are for the most serious events, as some relatives would try and report them.
Jessica Rose and Steve Kirsch came up with estimates for underreporting, which were about times 30 and 40. These are more reasonable and would put the SAE’s at about 1/3 bn or 1 in 12 (to keep it simple, that’s counting the whole world as vaxed). That looks more believable to me.
Even the lower estimate for reported events of 1 in 10 still leads to 2m dead and 200m serious events - still absolutely ma-hoosive. One in 40 of your acquaintances, seriously injured! It would be a death rate far exceeding deaths generously attributed to covid.
And as Dr H says, it’s ‘and counting’. He mentioned cancers but he didn’t go into that. He is however a pathologist.
Your more sober account carries a stronger ring of truth, E. I just put up the 20mill story because of interest where it might lead. It struck me too as something so big that it would be difficult not to notice, wherever you are.
Denis Rancourt endorses the idea that USAmericans have suffered nearly a million excess deaths - and clearly not from the IFR>0.5% nasty-flu. This conclusion being based on the weird all-cause mortality figures, varying very oddly according to jurisdiction boundaries, in a most unpandemic way.
A lot of that death seems to be down to the overall reactions of jurisdictions to the scam, causing a lot of unnecessary death simply by crazy, propaganda-driven responses that obviously were going to kill people, such as turning health services into single ‘illness’ (covid only) outfits, and thus condemning many to die of other ignored ills.
And now, of course, we have to factor in the growing tsunami of deaths and maimings coming from the pharma-gics’ for-profit mass poisoning campaign, in addition to all the rest.
For what it’s worth, we’ve just had another one in my neck of the woods; a (relatively) young fellar, in his early 50s, who died suddenly from a blood clot on his brain. He was a runner, very fit and healthy. The village was shocked by his death.
Thesedays you don’t even bother asking whether the deceased had the jabs.
Evvy and Rhis, there’s something very, very evil about all this that’s very difficult to talk about.
I don’t wish to be enigmatic, so I’ll just say it’s difficult to talk about because huge numbers of people have had this shit injected into them. I’m not being derogatory to these people, most of whom had to have the jabs to keep their jobs, or live a life, etc.
It’s the level of pure evil that’s gone on here that’s difficult to talk about.
I think I know what you mean Rob. We can study our Chomskys and political and ethical theorists but creative people who write disaster stories, and before that horror stories understood decades ago, (possibly much longer!) that perfectly ordinary people thinking rationally can be persuaded/fooled into doing very harmful things. The level of utter badness that’s on show may not be striking or even visible, but it’s there when you peel back to get to the force behind it - the evil man in the movies, or more likely the big guys, tycoons or corporations. But they’re not visible when you want to challenge ordinary people’s beliefs. That might be one source of discomfort in trying to reason with somebody you believe is committing harm.
I’ve not said it very well, but you said it was difficult so I hope that’s okay
Evvy, as you know I have a cat called Herricka. Cats, by their nature, go out and hunt. Herricka will bring her catches into the apartment. Most times the catch is already dead. Sometimes the catch is still alive, and the cat plays with it. When that happens I tell Herricka: just kill the feckin thing, which she normally does.
My wonky analogy here is with jab deaths: the Presstitutes are now openly reporting that large numbers are dying from the jabs, Ie, if you’ve had this shite injected into you, you might well have a nasty death. This is now being reported by the Presstitutes and the alt media shills.
This is where it now gets a bit difficult, because I’m going to have to get into satanism. Satanists don’t just kill people, they do it in the most cruel way possible, which includes telling their victims that they are going to have a very unpleasant death.
I know it’s difficult for most folks to get their head around, but that’s exactly what’s happening at the moment.
The cat playing with its catch before the kill.
Let me know if I haven’t explained this succinctly.
I had months of sleepless nights asking myself how I would forgive family for allowing my grandsons to be vaccinated if one of them died. Originally, I thought they would be ‘dead’ to me forever. Now, I think I would punish them (yes, no sympathy here), by reminding them at every opportunity, that they are responsible. Responsible because they were too blind to see. Too willing to conform. Too scared to speak out. Or in most of my families case, too hynotised to even enter into reasoned adult debate.
Not a quarter by any stretch, ED - in the last few years I’ve only seen and dealt with a fraction of the people I know - the folk I’ve seen most are my direct family (2 jabbed out of circa 30 individuals aged 2-61) - nothing untoward to report there thankfully - - the other group I see very regularly are work colleagues - 12 people in my team - to the best of my knowledge just myself and one other remain unjabbed - - 2 team members have gone off on long term illness - all hush hush, no reason has been cited for their absence - that’s unusual as in the past the general cause of an enforced absence is known to some extent. Also, I’ve noted that other team members complain about niggling issues with their bodies - one is newly plagued by headaches, another fit and active (55 yr old) has been enduring chronic, seemingly un-diagnosable pains in her legs - - another, hitherto sharp and witty Union rep who always had something to say in meetings is now kind of morose - his attention appears to drift off and he seems to be quite vague in his utterances nowadays.
Clearly nothing conclusive there - purely anecdotal. So long as the MHRA and other criminal enterprises are running the show there will be no genuine investigation of these things, and we’re unlikely to get much beyond speculation (albeit reasonable) from ‘unofficial’ and readily smearable sources.
Pat, you are a caring and sentient human being, that much is obvious.
This stuff is very difficult (and myself and most here will have experienced it as well). I suppose the bottom line is that there was a barrage of fear/propaganda that most people bought into.
The terror was perhaps understandable.
I’m not religious, yet what I’m going to say does have all those connotations:
I forgive you
If we can’t say that surely we become as bad as them?