5 Filters

Tom Cowan talking about Stephan Lanka's experiments (dissing the SARS-COV2 believers)

Covid
#1

This is a 1 hour video (no transcript) but you can easily watch at 1.5 times speed. It’s too important for me to mess up the interpretation by poor paraphrasing so I’ll just highlight two issues.

The first 25 minutes deals with “how do we know anything” and the biases that perception can bring in. Hence, “science” to rule out bias.

The next 25 minutes is a summary of Stephan Lanka’s experiments which naturally follows on from “how do we know anything”. Lanka can find 98% of the alleged SAR-COV2 genome, using PCR and NO SARS-COV2 material! How? Well apparently this is well documented by Kary Mullis and all the PCR scientific literature, that the amplification cycles result in new mRNA that is not in the original material being tested. At 38 cycles, 98% of his original material (which if I recall was some yeast), matches the alleged genome of SARS-COV2.

2 Likes
#2

Thanks for this Pat. On my ‘to view’ list. Underlines the old, still live question that the scamdemic episode has brought back into immediate currency and into focus: Is there in fact such a thing as a virus? Or does virus theory, despite its currently vast espousal by many professional working scientists, stand up to critical examination? Is it in reality destined eventually for the same discard bin that contains phlogiston and the geocentric cosmology of the pre-Copernicans, along with lots of other time-expired hypotheses?

I’d say that’s an open question, nicely re-activated - highly unintentionally - by the bi-annual -injections-forever bunch of chiselling shysters behind the scamdemic.

Naturally, the gocos (guardians of current orthodoxy), who always get apoplectic at any questioning of current ‘cast-iron’ assumptions, are dismissing these ideas with scorn, when they bother to notice them at all. But truth - as far as we can ever actually nail it down - has this habit of trickling out, come what may.

I suspect that Zach Bush’s idea may be nearer that truth: that ‘viruses’ should in fact be seen as exosome messengers, flowing constantly between the many different parts of the ecosphere as worldwide air and water plankton, spreading useful, necessary information about novel situations that have arisen somewhere in the ecosphere, that need to be dealt with and accommodated by the rest of it. That’s to say: useful information carriers - like postmen - rather than violent thieves breaking into your home with lethal intent. And with the further rider that these messages, when received, needn’t lead to classic illness, in anyone whose overall state of good health is at the level that it can be, when cared for wisely - or when living in the natural good health that seems to be widespread in any population living in harmony with its enveloping ecosphere. (Doesn’t sound very like modern urban/suburban hom sap, does it?)

This conception accommodates the awkward observed fact that during any wave of illness running through a population, some get ill, but some don’t at all; children in particular seem able to contract lots of ‘childhood diseases’ with aplomb, barely feeling some of them, rarely getting near death’s door with any of them, so long as they’re getting a healthy life and have no hereditary problems to deal with. In other words, receiving messages, with sample material included, and integrating them into the child’s developing immune system as a strengthener, rather than a debilitating attack. That appears to be the usual result for those few children in the West who can go through their childhood without ever being assaulted with multiple injections and other forms of modern Western ‘medicine’. Notably healthier and more vigorous than their continually assaulted counterparts.

3 Likes
#3

I’d definitely like to read more about this area of theory:

viruses’ should in fact be seen as exosome messengers,

Could be that birds do it, bees do it, even uneducated trees do it…

Though it is written in rather a twee style, the book Hidden Life Of Trees by Peter Wohlleben is well worth a look.

The defense mechanism whereby acacia trees react to giraffes eating their leaves is amazing. Essentially the distress of the early victims is expressed as a gaseous emission that leads to other trees nearby sending a bitter chemical to their foliage. This is unpleasant/noxious to the camelopards.

2 Likes
#4

Peter W as twee? Never thought of that, K! :slight_smile: I have both of his recent books, one actually a gift from a contributor here. Can’t say I ever got a sniff of twee-ery… Excellent speaker-to-trees, though; and speaker-for-trees.

#5

Pat, I haven’t yet had time to watch the complete video.

I would guess they’re saying that sars cov02 has never been isolated and identified in a laboratory. The next obvious question is: how can you test for something that no one knows actually exists. The next obvious question is: the PCR test, run at too many cycles, is widely acknowledged to be a complete joke.

The total madness goes on and on, but any excuse for some music. I think this might well become the Covidians theme song (it’s oft said that Grace Slick’s vocals on this short track were one of the greatest in rock history)…

1 Like
#6

Hi folks, this is fascinating stuff but there will be loopholes in the theories propounded - they are structures produced by mankind after all!

Could it not also be that everything is constructed from the same building blocks at the quantum level and so everything can be broken down into anything which can be identified as something we expect or know about.

What if you are a gain of function manipulating virologist who believes he/she has constructed something because he/she can see it in the microscope, and having made it once can repeat the process. Doesn’t the virologist have a known list of ingredients which make up the substance , which he/she can call anything, sars-cov2 for instance? The trouble is everyone can see that it has his/her fingerprints all over it and he /she knows the “stuff” is a killer or maimer if released near people - so a backstory is created to hide the manipulator.
Once the world is fearful of the stuff so that it reacts as planned, some of the false back story can be dispensed with and a new story can be inserted like e.g. “it is possible that someone made this stuff and it accidentally got out”.

The essential point is - the stuff could easily exist because it was created and its elements would be known and mapped - but like all stuff its 98% like everything else just shuffled together in a slightly different order and with a 2% poison added just for humans!

I thought Zach Bush considered the stuff to exist but that it was either easily dealt with by the human immune system or the stuff combined with pollutants to make it easier for the pollutants to enter our cells and poison them. The stuff acts like a postman with a message but innocently posts a few letters with “anthrax” in them - for ZB the “anthrax” is environmental and food poisoning, for the GOF manipulator the “anthrax” is whatever crap they want to get into the human body! Maybe its both?
I say this without reading or listening to Stephen Lanka just Tom Cowan.

cheers

1 Like
#7

Well summarised, C! I don’t think you have to go right down to the quantum level to see such transformations, though. Tom Campbell has been working to elucidate for some time the idea that much larger material objects can be called into existence just by some mind demanding information of any part of a system where no mind has looked before.

A random draw is then made from the full range of possibilities - each with its own probability already assigned by previous evolutionary patterns - and the ‘lucky’ item is then presented as the reply to the looker’s demand for information.

This then becomes an established precedent (as long as the asker remains alive and compos mentis, and especially when s/he spreads the word and exhibits the evidence, so that other minds accommodate the new fact too. (‘Fact’ is an interesting word here, drawn from the Latin word for ‘to make’, and therefore highly appropriate for this process; the fact is created by the Larger Consciousness System’s rendering engine giving a randomly-drawn answer to the questioner.)

Tom has been suggesting for some time that this process works with macro objects too (as my parapsychologist’s experience with larger-object materialisations in seance sessions seems to confirm), but it’s much easier by means of techniques such as the double-slit experiments to demonstrate the process replicably, to order, at the quantum level.

It seems to me that this sort of deeply perturbing experience is very difficult for people of the modern Western mindset to grasp. It is, of course, initially a very flummoxing phenomenon for all brought up on the currently-orthodox doctrines of reductive, materialist, deterministic science-philosophy. It takes a good dollop of what the veteran parapsychologist Ken Batcheldor used to call “acclimatisation and track record” to be able to believe it securely. Witnessing large objects materialise, as I did in sessions of Ken’s last sitter group, does help with this, though! :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

The point is: researchers breaking new information-getting ground at the molecular level will be doing much more ex nihilo creation of new molecular forms than perhaps they realise whilst still in thrall to the current orthodoxy. Plenty of these folk will have been calling new molecular patterns into existence, without ever grasping that that’s what they’re doing…

This hypothesis also tallies with Rupert Sheldrake’s ‘Hypothesis of Formative Causation’ and his idea of morphogenetic forms. (qv)

PS: Emoji function’s on the blink again.

1 Like