Alan, I too claim to have had two brushes with - well, something - which were just a small bit beyond my usual experience with respiratory - well, again, I can’t call them illnesses, since they haven’t made me actually ill for going on thirty years now - so shall I say ‘incidents’.
I could call them ‘covid’, perhaps, since they came at unusual times - Summer in the case of the ‘omicron’ alarm - and they made just slightly bigger ripples in my normal state of health than usual.
As I always do whenever these first early indications of something up respiratorially creep above my conscious threshold, I blasted them with mega-C dosing, and away they went, as usual, with no sweat whatever.
It’s these, and other people’s - unusual - experiences with flu-like ills during the time of the covid scam that make me think that there really was something unusual going about, a real illness, though with a miniscule IFR of less than half a percentage point, and easily treated with time-proven generics; possibly human-tampered, possibly an entirely spontaneous evolution; but something real, at least.
And since there has been, very clearly, this criminal attempt by - well, some ring of plotters - to erect a global ‘pandemic’ panic on this slightly odd flill, I reckon they must have known about it; something about it, not clear what exactly, just that it was coming; maybe because they knew that - well, someone - was going to release it.
Like a growing number of people, here and elsewhere, I no longer feel easy with bandying the word ‘virus’ about, because that whole concept has certainly come under serious question - again!
I usually assume that many are now using the word as a metaphoric shorthand for ‘something or other which appears to cause flu symptons in the vulnerable’; maybe a virus, if they really exist; maybe something else, which we’re now going to have to re-conceive differently.
It’s an awkward interim situation just now. But that doesn’t mean that all the adequately up-to-speed people who still use the ‘virus’ shorthand are still completely sure of their existence. A lot of them seem to be on the difficult road to ditching a time-honoured concept that they’ve believed all their adult lives. Emotionally tricky process! And one that takes time.
One thing, though, which does seem to get more and more established the more we ask: it seems that no-one - anywhere - can actually produce a purified, physical sample of a Sars-Cov2 ‘virus’; and certainly nothing that’s passed through the Koch verification process to prove that it’s the causative agent for ‘covid’ - the flu-like thing. If there is a bloody ‘virus’, where is it? Show me!
Awkward situation. But I too feel increasingly confident in saying: there was NO pandemic; there doesn’t appear to be a physically-produceable covid ‘virus’; and it may be that the whole ‘virus’ concept is wrong, and ripe for binning. Those conclusions at least look pretty nearly certain, by now.