So you’ve studied all that dense information at the GR link in depth already, then, have you, G? And you still conclude that AGW is a ‘proven beyond question’ absolute truth? I suggest you do as I’ve been doing just lately - and which I’ve also been quietly encouraging my nearest and dearest to do.
Which is to recognise that I accepted the CO2-driven climate emergency narrative years ago on trust; without actually scouring down to the bedrock of the story, to check whether it stands up.
And then came the covid swindle, self-evidently fake as it soon became clear that it was. And - along with many other former conformists in the intellectual beliefs de jour - I began to query my closest-held assumptions, and to see whether a serious bit of delving might confirm them… or maybe could call them into question.
And that’s where I am now: seriously looking to see whether the AGW thing really does stand up; or whether like many others with the necessary IQ and education to know better, I’ve lazily allowed myself to be fooled.
Might that have happened to you too, and your friends, G, as seems to have happened to me and my friends; several of whom are now aghast at my toying with apostasy against one of our holy truths…?
(You can see it in their eyes: “Oh god! The old man’s gone off on a geriatric paranoia jaunt! Too much damned internet…!”)
If we’ve learned anything from the covid scam, it’s that criminal operatives can - and will - try to run the most preposterous confidence tricks on we mere common hoi polloi… if they happen to divine what they see as a serious need to stampede us, along with a serious chance to scam big WealthPowerStatus out of us as they do it.
I have to say that the doings of the IPCC begin to smell of just that: crooks on the make, with useful-idiot/useful-cynic, self-doublethunk, nest-featherer technocrats holding their beer for them.
Still looking, in open-minded scepticism.