Spain Creates a List of Those Who Refuse to Get COVID-19 Vaccine
Link: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2021/01/spain-creates-a-list-of-those-who-refuse-to-get-covid-19-vaccine/#_edn1
In a country that knows full well that within, or just on the cusp of, living memory, such ‘membership’ lists were used in the civil war for the purpose of annihilation, this development could be seen as threatening.
Of course the government explains it away - but other countries are pondering such measures - with much of the pondering seemingly devoted to the more delicate problem of how to sell the idea.
In Australia, “the New South Wales Premier has revealed she is considering implementing regulations that would prohibited residents who have not vaccinated from entering certain venues”
“Anti-vaxxers who refuse COVID jab could be banned from certain venues”
Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9156901/Anti-vaxxers-refuse-COVID-19-jab-banned-pubs-restaurants-workplace.html
Note the headline, which is either deliberately misleading or inane.
Oops - didn’t sell it properly, she reflected: "She said the measures would be aimed at ‘incentivising’ uptake of the vaccine, which is vital to rebooting the economy, and businesses may require patrons to prove they had received the jab. "
Similar techniques for ‘incentivizing’ banks into giving you money get you locked up.
In the increasingly indoctrinated west, we now have bioethicists, who have the job of selling breaches of rights as incentives.
Here is Arthur Caplan, a bioethicist at New York University’s School of Medicine:
“…” Even the general public could be incentivized to get vaccinated. “Oddly enough, the best way to impose a mandate is to reward people with more freedom if they follow that mandate,” Caplan says. For example, with proof of inoculation, you would be able to attend a sporting event “as a reward for doing the right thing,” he says. “And I can imagine people saying, If you want to go to my restaurant, my bowling alley, or my tattoo parlor, then I want to see a vaccine certificate, too.”"
It’s not punishment, you just have to er, earn the right not to be punished.
Here’s another bioethicist whose services will be in demand:
Carmel Shachar, executive director of the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School. Hospitality industry workers—those who work in restaurants, bars, and coffee shops, for example—could also see similar mandates.
“It’s in an employer’s interest to make sure that their workplace is protected and that you can’t infect your colleagues,” Shachar says. “Having a widely accessible vaccine gets a lot of employers out of having to control their clients’ behavior.” And with a vaccinated workforce, “you don’t need to worry if the people you’re serving at the restaurant have COVID-19.”
Yes you don’t need to worry about your profits - the rights of the staff seem to be missing from this profound.ethical analysis.
In the piece in question, no questions were asked - even thought the writer, as well as contacting several such people, had also dug out a comparative estimate of 70% efficacy for jabs. The ‘ethics’ had been evaluated by reverse-punishment ‘experts’, and served up as if Well That’s It, Then. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/08/how-coronavirus-covid-vaccine-mandate-would-actually-work-cvd/
