5 Filters

The excellent CraigM - exhibiting his naive streak again!

Politics
#1

In this post:

I left a comment. Don’t usually on Craig’s blog, but this was too blatant to let pass:

SELFQUOTE:

"Craig, excellent good, honest, principled, deeply-experienced and sharply-intelligent man that you are (absolutely no sark intended!)… your broad naivety-streak is showing again:

The ‘vaccines’ (that are already so busily killing and maiming people) have ‘worked’, and have brought the ‘global health emergency’ to a stand; lockdowns, masks, etc., ‘work’; and on. This, about something which is in fact just a nastier-than-usual flu, from which over 99 percent of people recover, including over 95 percent of over-70s (me being one; self-medicated with one of the PROVEN real - and genuinely proven-safe - cures; mega-dose vitamin C in my case; no doctor, healthline or hospital consulted). Really, Craig! How can you have allowed yourself to be so thoroughly bamboozled?

Despite your deep knowledge of some fields, you’re a long way behind the curve on what’s really happening in the covid scam. You make a glaring ass of yourself to proclaim publicly how fully you’ve been suckered by the propaganda.

I’ve stopped offering troo-bleevers-in-covid any of the wide, and rapidly-growing body of respectable evidence showing that these convictions which you push here are nonsense. Mere objective, real-world facts don’t seem to have any effect on the believers’ comfort-seeking, terror-driven beliefs. But you have my email. If you can find time and interest to get your head straight about the covid scam, I’ll be happy to filter out the wilder, more speculative stuff, and provide you with samples of the sound evidence. I suspect that, like me, when you’re fully convinced about a matter, you’re willing to put your life where your mouth is. I’ve done it. So can you, once you get up to speed on the covid scam.

Seriously, Craig. I think you are indeed one of the very few public figures around who, in the service of principled honesty, would publicly issue an ‘I was wrong! Mea culpa!’ declaration about anything where you felt that previously-unnoticed evidence has forced you to change your mind. Not many people can manage to be so unbendingly honest with their own egos. Deep respect to you for that self-discipline. But please, good brother: do get your head straight about the scam.

Keep sluggin’ for Scotland and for truth, anyway! Free Alba ASAP!!"

UNQUOTE.

2 Likes
#2

I could change some of the subjects and objects and say the same about you’re attitude to the dangers of particle beam physics etc. and like Craig your are far from the only one…you are right up to a point but you woefully underestimate the opposition…it’s the same energies and people that represent the wider threat in both cases…

#3

Nice one RG, I do hope you get him to change his mind, he is truly principled and respected by us unwashed for it and despised/feared by the Davos crowd for it. But the real prize would be to change Galloway´s mind on this, he has a much bigger reach. Alas, he has invested too much of his ego in his stance, which will, accordingly, be more difficult to change.

1 Like
#4

Oh but G, I’m wide open to any evidence that you can put my way, Particle beams are already a thing to a modest extent. There may be devices that can boost that modest performance to something much bigger. So - let’s see some evidence for them; evidence that actually stands up to critical appraisal, that is…

I’ll get ahead of Craig and admit smilingly that I had it wrong, if you can provide anything convincing.

1 Like
#5

Sadly S, I found myself feeling just recently: “Damn! George has just slipped past his sell-by date!” Can’t say why exactly, but I just felt that he was slipping into a state of permanent marginalisation and irrelevance.

With THAT audience!? you might say. But yes. Much of his audience is outside Britain. Even those who are here show no sign of forming an effective mass movement. The Workers Party seems to be yet another of George’s transient bijou creations - alas!

If George would actually tell his MOATS audience that he had both covid and 11/9 wrong previously, and that he’s now seen the hard, high-quality evidence that convinces him that the one is a scam, and the other is a classic false-flag, then that would indeed make some serious waves to discomit the crooks behind these crimes. But between Craig and George, I think Craig probably has his ego more under control to be able to do it.

In any case, whatever the ‘influencers’ of our time may think, history will purify these narratives with hindsight, and both scams will be recognised and acknowledged eventually.

#6

Or will it be like changing his mind on Scottish independence!

#7

I don’t think Murray is naive. I would venture that an intelligent person like him, with an intimate knowledge of the Establishment, knows full well that the covid stuff is a complete scam.

His blog has always had the whiff of the security services about it (I’ve been banned from his blog not once, but twice!).

I’m not disparaging Murray - he’s probably a decent bloke - but who knows what ‘they’ have on him. The poor bastard is now facing a prison term.

1 Like