Hi folks just read this via TCW:
interesting CV, wholly unendorsed by Wikipedia which (using the inverse-wikipedia-on-politics rule) likely makes him a truthteller with vested interests, straight talking imo.
cheers
1 Like
Did you mean āno vested interestsā?
I didnāt do the reverse Wikipedia due diligenceā¦ the title Emeritus Professor was quite enough to convince me the writer canāt have his livelihood threatened.
A good piece, and thanks for sharing.
1 Like
I couldnāt quite see IP man being free of vested interests - he seems to have an investment portfolio that would fit any global warming enthusiast (uranium) as well as any old energy users (coal) - but as he says "that my links cannot possibly influence supernoval eruptions, solar activity and the Earthās orbit.āā :
in retrospect, perhaps I should just have stopped at truthtelling and straight talking !
cheers
1 Like
Oh I get you now @CJ1, maybe I should have looked a bit deeper too. I just figured āemeritusā therefore canāt be fired, like Frank Furedi or Noam for that matter. Yes: that looks deeply invested to me.
1 Like