What a disgusting and vile shill Vile is.
And hats off to the caller!
Article and audio recording at link:
1 Like
So many of them are…I’m so reassured to be with you guys…thinking that 90% of the country believe the vaccine cr*p (and have invested heavily emotionally in the techno.fix), is depressing and frightening…remember why you have an appendix folks and protect yourself with the least invasive treatments possible…Denial is a powerful weapon…;“if you accept this your children will be next” and in this case a whole host of other nasties (like 5G and increased investment in CERN), must be “acceptable”! Bl**din’ pedos…
Well done that man. In a fake show of BBC honesty, Vine tries to make a thing of the deception. But the guy did well with his immediate comebacks to Vine’s tropes.
2 Likes
Hi folks, a few simple bullet points to the rhetoric of people like Vine :
- this is a Government run system specifically to report deaths and injuries from vaccines and nobody from Government or their agencies have disputed even one reported case because they are not investigating them. If you don’t look you can’t see!
- the same is true for the Eudravigilance EU vaccine impact reporting system where vaccine deaths exceed 17,500 and injuries exceed 1.7 million, half of which are serious.
- all these systems have been established for years and the covid jabs over 6 months exceed all other vaccine reports added together over decades.
- several studies show that these systems only catch a small percentage ( some say less than 1%) of the real case numbers.
cheers
3 Likes
Hi folks just read this Offguardian article on Vine and the BBC Aunty anti-vaxxers :
Vine and his ill-k would no doubt have you believe that the world’s national vaccine side effect reporting systems were all full of anti-science misleading information - doesn’t this make Vine and the Biblically Corrupt Corporation - “conspiracy theorists”! Well there’s a xxxxing surprise!
cheers
Is 1% plausible? I really have no idea.
5% posters and 95% lurkers used to be commonplace on web ‘boards’ but I imagine people are much more participative now. It’s a silly example, probably, but then again I recall how, years ago, the yellow cards were exactly that, you tore them out of the back of the British National Formulary. When I say “them” my hazy memory suggests there was one card per book… what you did if that was missing I don’t remember. But it certainly can’t have encouraged much uptake. I’d be surprised if many medics noticed they were there in the first place. I expect there were other channels.
Thinking it through, to make a report you’d have to have noticed, or someone else has to have noticed, an adverse effect. You’d have to suspect a link with the jab (awareness is probably quite high or is that just among we troublemakers?) Then you’d have to realise this can, or should, be reported, and then find the appropriate website. At every step along the way people will decide they can’t be bothered.
One in a hundred? As I said, I’ve no real idea, but it’s almost certain to be a fraction of the whole.
As for Jezza Vine, he got told.
2 Likes
There’s something genuinely terrifying about passive-aggressives when they “turn”, but it is also repulsive!
1 Like