5 Filters

Syria -WTF?

The Syria they didn’t tell us about

Lorenzo Maria Pacini

December 21, 2024

This is the testimony of a Syrian who fought for his country and his people and who now suffers the most terrible defeat in life.

This article stems from a conversation I had with an old friend who was a commander of the Syrian Armed Forces, whose courage was appreciated and recognised throughout the Middle East. A true socialist from another era, who was never afraid to speak his mind and who, despite contradictions and different political views, never betrayed his country and support for his government.

As he has no pleasure in revealing his name, as he is still engaged in institutional activities abroad, we will call him by his fictional name Ram. Whether one agrees with his words or not, this is the testimony of a Syrian who fought for his country and his people and who now suffers the most terrible defeat in life.

The reunion with Ram

In Ram’s private study there is an air of life lived to the full. Hanging on the walls are various paintings of Syrian landscapes, along with some Koranic invocations and terracottas commemorating the battles he took part in. A few old books in Arabic can be glimpsed on the bookshelf, along with many posters of documents in various languages. Here and there are now faded photographs of men in camouflage uniforms in the desert. Looking towards the entrance, a Syrian flag with Bashar al-Assad’s face still full of dust, dirt and a few rips, as if it had been taken from the battlefield and immediately put on the flagpole. In the centre, a photo of his father, a wise and good-looking Arab man, with a black mourning keffiyeh on top.

We had known each other for years: I was a kid who read the classics of geopolitics and looked at the world with the desire to understand it, he was a fighter who had lived through incredible situations and retired to private life, continuing to work for his country in other ways, out of the spotlight. I loved listening to the anecdotes he would pull out of his memory each time, it was like plunging into a different world, almost improbable for how ‘other’ it was from the West. Above all, a world in which the war, the struggle for freedom and a different political situation were not something decades away, but fresh events whose scars were still open and bleeding.

He has always had great respect for me and my support for the Syrian cause, which is why he allowed me to meet him. He welcomes me with the warmth, respect and depth that belongs to the Syrian people, famous for thousands of years for their ability to welcome and integrate. He offers me a long coffee and we start talking.

‘Ram, what do you think?’ I ask him.

The happiness of our meeting suddenly disappears. His face becomes serious and his head tilts forward as if in deep thought. After a few seconds, he looks up: ‘I have never told anyone. Perhaps the time has come to tell what I knew, what I saw’.

What follows is her testimony, delivered to me with great emotion and palpable pain from the first to the last word.

We already knew everything

‘What happened was not expected by anyone, except those who, like me, had already glimpsed the plot of events as far back as 2011 and perhaps had had anticipations from trusted contacts. We already knew everything. We knew that Bashar al-Assad was preparing something with the rulers of other countries, arranging his good exit the moment support in the Middle East collapsed or things went bad’. The seriousness of the conversation does not admit of irony or sarcasm. Ram is serious and tries to make me understand the gravity of his words, trusting in my professionalism and the trust that binds us.

The thesis he supports and which he explains to me in many details, some of which I cannot report due to the delicacy of the information cited, is that Bashar al-Assad was too friendly with Westerners: his banker wife, the dinners in the United Kingdom, the smell of Freemasonry, a certain passivity in the face of the corruption of politicians and the high ranks of the armed forces. Too many elements that many Syrians did not like and that already in 2000, when he came to power, had aroused suspicion and disappointment among those who, like Ram, had risked their lives for the revolution.

The events of 2011-2013, the internal uprising, the jihadist terrorism, had all been consequences of previous mistakes. Assad had winked too much at the West…but also at the East. To Russia, for example. ‘I confess I had believed it, I had hoped for it. Putin could really make a difference. I never trusted any other ruler, but I did, because he had really provided essential help in defeating terrorism and had guaranteed Syria at least a minimum of international security,’ he tells me, exploring his many memories. ‘But it didn’t help, because Russia was also involved in the agreement. We have been betrayed twice: as a country, by Russia who let the enemy assault us; as Syrian people, by our president who sold out all of us to save his own skin’. There is anger in Ram’s eyes. A solemn anger that admits of no lies.

‘And I will tell you more: for me, the agreement was signed in concert with Israel and the US. American Jews are interested in the Middle East to realize the Greater Israel project and the construction of the Third Temple, Russian Jews are interested in Ukraine, the old Khazaria. They win either way. Israel won even before sending troops to invade’. Strong and precise words, as befits a commander who has been at war for real.

He then explained to me that information had already been circulating for a couple of months about Assad’s escape and the handover of Syria without effort, but these were not rumors that were given much credence and the versions of events were sometimes contradictory and inaccurate. But it was clear that something was moving.

He tells me some anecdotes of when he was fighting, of the cities he defended and when he also took part in conflicts in other countries: ‘I have seen in my life the enemy arrive in Beirut, in Damascus, in Aleppo, in Hama, in Homs. I have seen the enemy succeed in making us believe they have won, but then be swept away by the courage of our men. There were times when I thought it was the end, that we were losing the war, but then something happened that gave new impetus to the Resistance. This time – the first time in my whole life – I saw defeat’.

This is the most painful point. ‘We did not lose, we were defeated. This is much worse. ‘Woe to the vanquished!’ said the Latins.’ Defeat is the most terrible thing for a long-standing commander. The Syrian people have always shown heroic resistance, but something went wrong somewhere.

‘Do you know what I saw over there the last time I went? Poverty, hunger. There is no electricity, no water, no food supplies, not even fuel. The army is left to fend for itself in absolutely precarious conditions’. He tells me that some 700,000,000 young Syrians have given their lives to fight against the enemy.

Blood, blood, blood. Is it possible that the Middle East has to be constantly bathed in blood?

Then he explains to me the corruption he has seen, from checkpoints where the military took bribes without checking up on them to high officials bought with the luxury of private cars, villas, Western souvenirs.

‘Once when I was driving out of Damascus towards Homs, I met two very young boys in uniform along the road. They were thin and were smoking. I stopped them and asked them what they were doing there in that condition. They replied that they had no money to go to Homs, to spend the 24 hours of leave they had, nor did they have money to eat. I loaded them into the car with me and we left. During the journey we talked, they told me about the misery they lived in at the base. Their daily ration of food was a tomato and a potato. Once a week they were given a chicken to share among eight people. In my time there was food and the troops had to be well fed to be ready to fight. How can this happen? In the last 13 years, the government has completely destroyed the army: corruption of officers, lack of supplies, disengagement in the fight for the national cause’.

Soleimani, Raisi, Nasrallah. Someone betrayed

‘When General Soleimani – whom I knew as a young soldier – was killed by the American demon in 2020, I immediately sensed that something was starting to go wrong. He was much more than a General, he was a real Man, a leader, a living example. After him, unfortunately, the Resistance did not have another soldier capable in the same way of coordinating thousands of men from different countries, religions and ethnicities. This was an enormous strategic disadvantage’. We briefly reviewed the history of the Axis of Resistance and reasoned together about the geopolitical implications for the entire Middle East.

‘When I heard about Raisi’s death, I didn’t want to believe it. It seemed impossible. From that moment on, everything went downhill. Every day I watched the news with the fear that something even more terrible might happen. And so it was: one after the other, they took out all the leaders of Hezbollah and Hamas’. A tragic truth, which I could only confirm.

The speed with which the enemy exterminated the military leaders of the Lebanese resistance one after the other was unbelievable, proving that agencies like the CIA, MI6 and Mossad did a great job. This is an incontrovertible fact. In the space of a few months, the entire political geography of the Middle East underwent a mutation that had not succeeded in years of trying.

‘Who knew the coordinates of Nasrallah’s bunker**?** Maybe three people in the world: Khamenei, Soleimani, Assad. Khamenei rather than betray would be ready to die with rifle in hand. Soleimani has already been taken out. There is only one left…’. At these words I stand open-mouthed: the commander had never spoken ill of his president, although I knew that politically he was not a supporter of him in everything, but had always supported his leader’s battle, for the good of the whole country. Anger, disappointment and pain brought out the truest words. A gamble, but still true.

Because one of the big questions that remain open is ‘who’ revealed Nasrallah’s exact location: an intelligence tracker? A spy? A paid-for piece of information? Or a traitor? The fact is that Nasrallah is no more and this, in Ram’s words, means that Lebanon will be the next to fall and Palestine, consequently, will no longer exist except in the memories of the last Arabs scattered around the world.

‘Syria fell in a matter of days because it had already fallen to the will of its rulers who had sold it out. 70,000 soldiers migrated within hours, taken in taxis (which cost a lot of money), not military vehicles, to the border with Iraq. It was all planned. Not a single bullet was fired in this invasion. This is not the Syrian army I know. This ‘thing’ is a perversion without dignity’.

He points to a photo behind him, I catch a glimpse of a soldier in uniform, one of those postcard photos you send to your parents when you do your military service: ‘Look at that boy there, 22 years old. Slit his throat’. He froze for a few moments, his eyes swollen with tears. It was the son of a close friend of his.

What will happen now?

Ram does not feel like talking about the coming days or weeks or months. Arab and secular Syria no longer exists. The word of the defeated has little value.

‘Something unthinkable is happening these days. There is no information in the media about it because it would be something terribly raw. Imagine 70 years of ethnic, cultural and religious hatred: they are getting even. There is almost fear in uttering these words. I remember that he has a brother in the Islamic clergy and several nieces and nephews, and with some concern I ask him what about them, so he replies: ‘I am trying to get my relatives out of Syria, but since 8 December I cannot even get in touch with them. A tragedy that is the common sentence of too many thousands of people in those lands.

In concluding our conversation, which lasted about an hour, Ram ventures an almost ‘prophetic’ projection: ‘I say it: yesterday Palestine, today Syria. Tomorrow Lebanon for good. Then Yemen. Once Yemen and Lebanon have fallen, Iran will be next. In between there is nothing left, Iraq is a gas pump surrounded by American gunmen, it will fall soon. President Trump is ready to destroy Iran, the intelligence community already knows this. If Khamenei dies, Iran collapses’. A few seconds of silence. Khamenei is the last remaining ‘global’ Islamic authority and the last patron of the Resistance.

‘Then it will be Russia’s turn. Millions of Sunni Islamic immigrants in the odor of extremism are already on the streets of Russian cities. They let in indiscriminately, they will pay the consequences. Then it will be Rome’s turn. Then Beijing’s. I await the day when the ‘long beards’ will come marching into Red Square and St. Peter’s Square. I hope to die before that terrible day’.

Here ends our conversation. A deep silence that lasts a few minutes. We stand up to say goodbye. Sighing, I take my formal leave and look one last time at the relics of the patriotic war Ram fought. I try to ask myself if I too would be ready to give my life as so many heroes and martyrs did who are no longer here today, but whose example will remain forever.

4 Likes

Bleak.

So Syria was a long game with COVID and Ukraine attracting all the attention. And then the game was ended and (a traitor? Yes that feels right) Syria was wound down.

Trump gets to pick up the ball, excoriating the Ukraine thing (but nothing else) and bringing out the likes of Trudeau to stone. But maybe not Britain?

Tail. Dog.

Thanks for sharing this great piece @Rich

Edit: to atone. Not stone.

1 Like

I guess its all over. There’s now only defeat, fear, depression. No hope, we’re all fucked, thank goodness for assisted suicide, coming soon to a NHS facility near you…

Thanks a bunch.

Alastair Crooke : Balance of Power in the Middle East.

Alistair Crooke says there is a long game going on. The fall of Syria was inevitable as it’s assets were eroded for years by Turkey and the Kurds. Way too much cost and effort for Russia to intervene on its own, Russia needs to concentrate on winning the Ukraine war, and on talking Trump out of ongoing Ukraine involvement. The key for Putin to the talks once Trump is inaugurated will be persuading Trump that the big victory we wants to present for himself has to be in the bigger picture of east-west relations, particularly with regard to intermediate range missiles. (Personally I can’t see Trump and his advisers going as far as to abandon this policy, but it would be good for the world)

Crooke is not impressed with Israel’s show of destruction in the west of Syria, this may have to do with Netanyahu trying to boost the idea that he is more useful to Israel in power than in jail.
Whoever steps in first to undefended territory may not gain long term advantage; Crooke suggests Ergodan’s ambitions may stretch as far as Jersualem (!).
But for Netanyahu, Turkey, the biggest player, is only a problem for the future - and whether he personally has one is his immediate focus. For now Israel seems to be inheriting a jihadist state on its border and there will be millions of extra Palestinians everywhere.

In the btl’s much is made of American ‘stupidity’. OTOH Syrian assets are now boositng US and Israeli coffers.
OTOOH, the Biden regime has also ‘fallen’. Good news for Russia if not necessarily the Palestinians.
It’s a bit hard to calculate…

It seems Crooke, a former diplomat, doesn’t approve of the policy (whatever it is); along with the retired US generals and those from the war fabric that have a conscience.
As a counter to the ‘good news’ hype, perhaps the simple fact of the opposition from those who should be on board with aims and objectives - tells us something about that policy.

2 Likes

I think I watched this a couple of nights ago. His rather flip delivery took me off guard.

Turkiye has played this very well, so far. Russia will probably be able to keep the sweet scent of BRICS membership wafting into Erdogan’s garden window. In all honesty Turkiye is a power of the near-first rank. Keeping common ground with them, if not a warm alliance, is very prudent.

1 Like

Just to add to the confusion, here is Vanessa Beeley who has lived in Syria for sometime now, making clear that nothing is yet clear except:

a) It would appear the Russians did nothing to support Assad, perhaps even dealing with HTS behind his back

b) Assad appears not to have abandoned Syria but was forced out

c) There has been a lot of collusion between HTS, Israehell, Turkey, USukisnato, and the Russians

Beeley’s summary is that Syria is now a borderless stretch of land with equal numbers of US and Russian bases, Israehell with control of key water supplies and Turkey and the US in control of the oil.

2 Likes

Thanks PatB, the more honest and informed views the better!
It would be a bit much to expect Russia to defend Syria on its own, but we don’t know how the retreat started, maybe the Syrian soldiers saw the writing on the wall. Guess Ukraine is the difference now. The ‘stupid’ Americans know the benefit of keeping a target country busy on as many fronts as possible.
Doesn’t seem to apply to Israel, due to seemingly endless supply of US weaponry. Amazingly, the latter are rarely ever mentioned in terms that even suggest they could be the aggressor.

It’s enough to make you boycott Snow White. Of course in wider terms the US may be the ultimate victim of its own reach. I can’t see how even its reach can include the emerging eastern and southern powers, even as its wordly credit - based as it is on past traditions, repute and fear - runs out.

I read it twice. It nails it, you’re right. And so was FP:

The Kennedy assassination has demonstrated that most of the major events of world significance are masterfully planned and orchestrated by an elite coterie of enormously powerful people who are not of one nation, one ethnic grouping, or one overridingly important business group. They are a power unto themselves for whom those others work. Neither is this power elite of recent origin. Its roots go deep into the past.

Fletcher Prouty (1992)

The snip below is from the latter part of Rusere Shoniwa’s excellent article posted above by AlanG. The whole thing is well worth the time.

There are disagreements within the global financial oligarchic system, and those differences are varied and complex. But there is one thing that now unites our overlords more than ever – an understanding that the entire global population must be oppressed if they are to preserve their hold on concentrated wealth underpinned by a global power structure.

The so-called emerging multipolar world order is a Punch and Judy show put on by the OCGFC to install a world order controlled by financial capital. The savagery of war, with its needless indiscriminate killing, is the ultimate human crisis that the parasitic class has come to depend on to advance its agendas of concentrating wealth and imposing greater controls on the mass of humanity, which it fears and despises. To that end, a showdown with Iran is virtually inevitable. Perhaps the most galling aspect of it all is that the parasitic controllers are confident there is no risk to them, which is why they are hurtling down this path. They believe they will achieve their aims regardless of who emerges as the victor in any conflict.

If Iran is to prevail, it will likely have to rely on some level of support from Russia and China. In which case, the parasitic class will pull the financial levers of a BRICS-led world order. If Iran is destroyed, they believe they can rule over a Zionist world order – an even more Zionist order than the current one we’re living in, if you can imagine such a horror.

As with national elections, the Establishment has a preferred choice, and the criteria are actually quite similar to those used in the election fraud – which fork in the road will hoodwink the masses more effectively? But rest assured that either way, war is the ‘problem’ presented to the people, and the ‘solution’ remains the same – a global public-private partnership fronted by the UN, in which local freedom and autonomy are sacrificed at the altar of a carbon-rationed, global digital gulag. And all the global world powers, under the direction of the OCGFC, are firmly signed up to that dystopia. Every manufactured crisis, every war, is designed to lead us into that pen.

That is why the global Establishment always cooperate with each other at crucial moments. That is why none of them should be trusted or supported. That is why Syrian troops were betrayed and ordered to stand down in Homs.

2 Likes

Here’s another good 'un in our view:

2 Likes

This is the best video I have seen so far on this subject. Two things that Marouf said really struck a chord with me.

First, was his comment on the Yemeni action against Israehell. Their insistence on only military targets while the zionist entity are striking civilian infrastructure is a mistake. I agree completely.

He also pointed out that Israehell’s air capabilities (which we know Iran has the capability to wipe out) should have been destroyed by Iran. Again, any fool can see this and they would then be walking the walk in support of the Palestinians, rather than just talking the talk.

Thanks for posting.

2 Likes

So is Israhel over stretching? As a US proxy Air Force they only hailed fire on Syria when confident no air defence capability would be used. Then all bets are off.

The Empire’s middle-eastern operation is in purely demolition-centred mode, when no Palestinians are able to be lured into crossfire. Seems unlikely the Zionist entity will try to defend any territorial gains, except at Golan, though.

Quite a lot more to be negotiated in the early new year?

Something is starting to smell bad in all of this.

Some interesting observations about Putin from PCR who’s been critical of Putin for quite a while:

Will Russia Collapse in 2025?

December 26, 2024

Will Russia Collapse in 2025?

Paul Craig Roberts

Is Putin’s Government Trying to Be a 19th century liberal government in the brutal evil world of the 21st century?

I raise this question not only because Putin has been fighting in his gentlemanly way a war on Russian territory in Ukraine for six months longer without yet winning than it took Stalin’s Red Army to defeat the formidable German Wehrmacht in World War II, and still Putin has not cleared Ukrainian troops from the small Donbas area or from the Ukrainian invasion of Russian Kursk. Does anyone remember when Putin declared that Russia would never again fight a war on its own territory? Putin has been fighting a war on Russia’s own territory for longer than the Soviet offensive took to drive the German invaders out of Russia. Moreover, Putin and Lavrov seem to be relying on Trump, not the Russian military, to bring the conflict in Ukraine to an end by agreeing to a mutual security treaty.

None of Putin’s declarations have had any effect on Washington’s determination to further breakup Russia, a constraint on American hegemony. Neither have any of the super weapons that Putin has waved in the face of the West. Putin’s reliance on useless “agreements,” such as the Minsk Agreement and the Astana Agreement that sunk Syria, together with Putin’s clamps on the Russian military in Donbas, has convinced Washington that Putin will not fight. Washington finds it extraordinary that it took Putin eight years after Washington’s coup in Kiev, which placed a Washington Puppet in charge of Ukraine, to come to grips with the fact that he had a problem, deceived as he was by his useless Minsk Agreement.

After Putin’s intervention in Syria that prevented US President Obama’s invasion of Syria, Putin’s only proactive move, Putin refused to allow Syria to use Russian air defense systems to prevent Israeli attacks on Syria and on Iranian officials. During the entire time of the Russian Air Force’s domination of Syrian air space, Putin permitted Israel and Washington to attack Syrian territory at will. One wonders why Putin ever bothered to intervene in Syria. The can got kicked down the road for awhile, but the final result was that Putin ran from the Israeli/Washington invasion and placed the Syria he had defended in the hands of Washington and Israel. Putin simply wrote off 8 or more years of the Russian Air Force fighting in the defense of a Syrian government elected by Syrians.

Now the road is open for Israel to occupy Lebanon. No more embarrassing defeats of the vaunted Israeli Army at the hands of the Hezbollah militia devoid of an air force or heavy weapons. Twice the Israeli Army, good only for killing women and children, ran for its life from Hezbollah. But now thanks to Putin, Syria is no more, and there is no way to resupply Hezbollah. Hezbollah sat on its butt and did nothing while Israel assassinated all of its leaders and commanders and cut off its resupply routes. Inaction always leads to defeat, and Putin’s inaction is leading to Russia’s defeat. In the final days, to avoid this Russian defeat will the button be pushed?

Iran is now also isolated and wonders what trust it can put in Putin, who is so averse to fighting. The Chinese and the BRICS now face the same question. Can Russia be counted on in a showdown?

My critical words do not comprise even a beginning of Putin’s long list of strategic mistakes. I have written about some of them on this website. But many I have not have had a chance to address.

Consider this one for example. Russia is a federation, a weak political structure as it amounts to a tower of babel, and it has Muslim provinces. Putin’s policies in the Middle East have favored Israel over Muslims. Recently, perhaps in response to Israel’s genocide of Palestine, Russian Muslims attacked Jews in a Muslim province of the Russian Federation. Why there were Jews there is incomprehensible. Putin’s government immediately arrested the Russian Muslims and committed Russia’s Muslim citizens to 7 and 8 years in prison for assaulting Jews. But Putin has done nothing about Israel’s murderous assaults on Palestine and Lebanon and Syria.

So why is Putin on Israel’s side and not on the side of the Russian Federation’s own Muslim citizens? The Putin government’s persecution of its own citizens for their expressed opposition to Israel’s murderous treatment of Muslims raises the question whether Putin is really a nationalist leader or just another Israeli puppet like Washington. Even Trump’s government is overwhelmingly Zionist.

Russia’s Muslim province just gave the green light to polygamy. This is inconsistent with Russian law. Here we have a new breakage in the Russian Federation, a double breakage considering the Russian government taking the side of Israel over the Russian Muslim population. Little doubt the Muslim leaders will have to reverse the decision. What an extraordinary gift Putin has handed to Washington’s neoconservatives to exploit. Here we have Putin helping Washington’s breakup of the Russian Federation.

Let’s see. During the years Putin has been in office, Washington has established missile bases on Russia’s borders in Poland, Romania, and Ukraine. Ukraine, formerly a Russia friendly country, has become Washington’s ally in a war against Russia, still not acknowledged by the Russian Foreign Ministry, which seems unable to acknowledge any reality.

Putin the Unready was not ready for the US/Georgian invasion of South Ossetia, nor for Washington’s Maidan Coup in Ukraine, nor for the necessary Russian intervention in Donbas, nor for the defense of Syria, host of Russia’s naval and air bases for the projection of Russian power, nor for Armenia, nor for Washington’s ongoing color revolution in Georgia. Putin is never ready for anything but a worthless paper agreement with his enemies. Is Putin Capable of Strategic Thinking? |

Putin has guaranteed that Washington’s provocations of the Russian government will continue until Putin has only two choices: surrender or war. Putin is capable of surrendering, but will the Russian General Staff take the decision out of his hands? The war will be due not only to Washington’s aggressions but also to Putin’s lack of response and strategic ability.

I have wondered if the shakeup of the Russian generals with departures and indictments are actually moves against corruption as announced or moves against Russian patriots who think they are watching Putin’s sell out of Russia to Washington, just as the CIA and US Joint Chiefs of Staff saw America’s leader, US President John F. Kennedy, selling out America to the Soviet Union.

Putin’s inability to put his foot down, except verbally, is leading the world into nuclear war. Putin’s new weapon lets him pretend the war won’t be nuclear, but it will be, because no one but Putin has the new super weapon. Putin and Lavrov’s warnings about war are always undercut by their own denials. Consequently, Russian warnings carry zero weight.

We cannot look to Trump for peace. Trump has appointed mainly a Zionist government. Having lost Syria, Russia is on the defensive. Part of making America great again is the restoration of Washington’s hegemony, which Putin challenged until he collapsed. What this means is that it is unrealistic to expect Trump to agree to a Ukrainian settlement on Putin’s announced terms.

If Trump agrees to Putin’s reasonable terms, the presstitute media will discredit Trump with his own supporters by declaring him a Putin agent who settled Putin’s aggression on Putin’s terms. Trump will become the President “who lost Ukraine.”

It remains to be seen how much longer the Russian General Staff will tolerate Putin’s ineptitude as a war leader.

There is much PCR states as fact which can be explained by an alternative theory. There is also a lot I agree with. I’m just waiting for the better thinkers here to say they think.

Hi folks, two points:

  1. Putin has declared who are the enemy and they do not include civilian Slavs hence the cautious approach. Putin has deliberately sought to avoid actions that amount to war crimes - unlike the crimes of the West.

  2. The West has taken 8 years to create massive fortifications which have not been easy to overcome or outflank.

Cheers

2 Likes

Do I trust anyone anymore? Not really. Everything is plausible, not just the good things.

It is easy to pin blame on VVP. And it’s all too easy to ignore the many facts too. There are two large ones above my post (Thanks @CJ1 ).

There’s the fact that Putin has rescued Russia and given Rothschild the middle finger. He’s clouted billionaires like unruly children and has restored belief in Russia itself. He is ex KGB. This alone makes him one hell of an enigma. Did he play Klaus like a spook would, gaining his confidence? Did he get played trying to at the table if the west (he would have taken it, but would he invade randomly (ignoring Libya, is not the same as going in)?) Or was he willingly part of the plan (seen Kingsman movie?) Who knows, we won’t. But maybe our kids will?

I suspect Syria has been sacrificed as part of a bigger plan. Countries only ever have interests. Iraq is looking weak and feeble in the big picture. Isn’t that part of Greater Israel too? Or maybe Egypt? Someone’s getting it, and it won’t be too long to wait.

2 Likes

And yet the Russians are making the same mistake as the Iranians. They are leaving airfields intact when it would be oh so simple to finish any possibility of attack by aircraft.

Like many of you, I don’t trust any state actor and very few politicians.

1 Like

Curioser and curioser…
Including the article within. Like, the Biden dead duck administration intends moving to oppose the threat of stability in Syria. They don’t have much time for that, but the UK is on tow.

Looks like Russia is the real strategic target in Syria.

But other than that Trump seems unlikely to get on too well with the Starmer regime, it’s hard to make sense of this in any detail.

Supports Alex Kramer’s kind of view just posted by @Rich in the other thread, that Boris Johnston gambled the UK’s finances on Ukrainine ‘winning’ or at least destabilising Russia; if so then staying in the game - using our worsening assets in the hope of a late win via Syria - might make sense in an insane or desperate way.

ED

Syria’s new leadership asserts strategic alliance with Russia

  • By Al Mayadeen English
  • Source: Agencies
  • 29 Dec 2024 17:47
  • 5 Shares

3 Min Read

Al-Sharaa says that the new Syrian leadership does not wish for Russia’s presence in Syria to end “in a manner that is inconsistent” with their longstanding bilateral relationship.

The leader of Syria’s new regime forces, Ahmad al-Sharaa underscored the country’s strong strategic ties with Russia during an interview with Al Arabiya released on Sunday. While discussing Moscow’s global standing, al-Sharaa stated, “Russia is the second most powerful state in the world. It is of great importance. Syria shares strategic interests with Russia.”

Speaking to the Saudi state news channel, al-Sharaa, also known as Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, said that the new Syrian leadership does not wish for Russia’s presence in Syria to end “in a manner that is inconsistent” with their longstanding bilateral relationship.

In comments to Sputnik on Sunday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that Moscow had not been informed of any plans by Syria’s interim government to revisit agreements related to Russia’s military presence.

“Undoubtedly, the change of power that has taken place and the change in the state of affairs on the ground are making certain adjustments regarding the Russian military presence in Syria. It is not only about preserving our bases or strongholds, but also about the conditions of their operation, maintenance and provision, and interaction with the local side. These topics could be the subject of negotiations with the new Syrian leadership,” Lavrov said.

Moreover, the situation in Syria does not impact the comprehensive agreement established between Russia and Iran, the foreign minister affirmed, adding that it was ready to be signed and officiated.

He described the agreement as comprehensive, long-term, and adaptable to all circumstances, requiring no amendments despite the change in Syrian leadership. Lavrov highlighted that the agreement reflects significant progress in bilateral relations and elevates them to the level of a strategic partnership.

US-UK directing attacks on Russian military bases in Syria

On Saturday, Sputnik reported that the US and the UK are preparing terrorist attacks against Russian military bases in Syrian territory, citing Russia’s SVR…

According to statements issued by the press bureau of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), ISIS field commanders have been supplied with attack drones to target Russian military bases in Syria, as the outgoing US administration and British leadership aim to hinder efforts to stabilize the situation in Syria.

“According to information received by the SVR, the outgoing US administration and the British leadership, with the overthrow of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, are aiming to prevent the stabilization of the situation in this country. More broadly, they aim to maintain a state of chaos in the Middle East,” the report read.

The aim, according to the SVR, is to maintain US-UK dominance and achieve their geopolitical objectives in the region “based on the odious concept of a rules-based order.” However, the bigger plot is challenged by the Russian presence on the Mediterranean coast of Syria, which still majorly preserves regional stability.

The statement also indicated that the US plans to continue occupying Syria’s oil-rich regions east of the Euphrates River under the pretext of fighting ISIS, emphasizing that Washington has no intention of leaving these areas.

Alex Krainer has plenty more to say:

He seems a pretty bright laddie (must be if he agrees so much with us . . . ) but what he and most otherwise OK commentators don’t appear to get is the BRICS support of the globalists’ agenda; UN sustainability goals, WHO scamdemic preparedness, the whole bloody shebang (look at the shite they agree on and issue after their cosy chats, last one Kazan). It’ll be the same world (mis)government with a different set of middle & junior managers.

2 Likes

Indeed @AlanG. I’ve ponder a fair few hours on this. My gut instinct says you’re correct. It’s a safe assumption that Kayfabe is being used to deceive the masses.

The only reasonable explanation is, there is no choice. Yes TINA. But not how we’re used to. It’s about who gets there first.

Best example I can give of this is when Windows went 64bit. For decades, Microsoft and Intel worked together. This gave Intel an edge over others. Then AMD brought out the 64bit chip. Instructions were provided and created through joint efforts. When Intel caught up, they tried to make Microsoft change the underlying instructions, Microsoft said NO!

Whoever gets there first wins the century. They win control over finance, data and control. It’s inescapable. Look at China if you want an idea. In China, social credit scores are used to promote better behaviour. Jordan wouldn’t be going on holiday if she was Chinese.

But we’re stuck at trust no one, so can only spectate to confirm our suspicions.

Hi Alan,

Did you have something like this in mind?

https://youtube.com/shorts/xBYA0kZztwg?si=2_TcpOuafRLANPFQ