5 Filters

Stew Peters interviews (an expecting to be murdered, forecasting mass-murder) John O'Looney

I’m surmising that John has had so much conversation with like-minded dissidents since he first went public that his overall take on the scam has crystallised - and radicalised - considerably. Anyone else notice this?

This is another straw in the wind which makes me suspect that this situation is building up to the suburbs of civil war, or some sort of revolutionary situation perhaps just short of outright war, driven by popular rage as people realise how they’ve been lethally scammed.

Remember Chris Hedges’ anecdote about the fall of the communist government of East Germany: Honecker sent the paratroops to fire on the demonstrators (their fellow Deutschers), the paras refused… and as Chris puts it: “Honecker was gone in a week.” Such volte-faces can happen very suddenly.

It’s some such critical-mass mutiny amongst the Deceived Influencers, particularly the military and the police, which is a crucial development to be watched for now. As John points out, once these bulldogs of the power-wielders become afraid for their own children, when children start dying of the poison-stabs (already happening but not yet in sufficient numbers to provoke outraged, homicidal mutiny), what price their obedience to authority then?

The scammers behind the covid swindle are panicking, probably because their fear of imminent collapse of their socio-economic system, certainly in the West, made them launch their scam before it was fully ready, and they’re screwing things up. Their stunt is by no means pulled off with complete success yet. Still all to play for, and the first turmoil of a turning tide already detectable, it feels like.

2 Likes

PS: Forgot to underline John’s comment on giving a variable number of placebo shots in the poison-stabs, to create a percentage of people who will say noisily: “Well we got the shots, and we’re fine!” (which of course they are, since there’s no Black Death rampaging round the world, just a slightly nastier than usual flu) so as to maintain the crowds of people who remain in trance under the PBB.

The smaller percentage who get the real poison either die soon, or head on towards infertility - if they’re young - or delayed death/maiming, spreading the numbers out so as to maintain plausible deniability.

I don’t know for sure whether the de-population hypothesis now being much bandied about amongst the dissidents is right. But I puzzle about the purpose behind the all-out authoritarian drive to get as many millions - billions? - stabbed as possible. The fanatical commitment to that strategy by - someone - has been very evident. Why? Why is it so vital to get so many people stabbed, excluding the obviously ridiculous talking point that “they’re doing it for our good, to maintain public safety…” It seems to me self-evident that the idea of ‘public good’ being upmost in the motivation of TPTsB is obvious bs. So what’s the real motive?

Just mega-profit? In that case ALL the injections could be harmless placebos, since there’s no genuine need for the stabbing tsunami at all, as it grows clearer that we could indeed have just let natural herd immunity arrive without any hugely-expanded excess death toll. The pharma crooks could have got the multi-billion rip-off thus, without any of the complications to the scam that we’re actually watching unfold. Huge rip-offs of wealth are always welcome to crooks, of course. They won’t turn these ones down. But something more is going on too, it seems clear.

In trying to second guess and wrap up the whole story he’s strayed outside his knowledge base - the leap to a mass murder programme doesn’t have particular evidence behind it. Whereas, what has happened has been magnificent for selling vaccines while persuading the population to demand more and more, as well as putting on their own leashes; while pushing law and human rights outside the covid tent.

His experience seems real though, and I think he’d have been better garnering support from his colleagues on that score; that could bring the issue of timing of deaths vis-a-vis the vaccine to the fore. It might also get the widespread use (and pre-ordering) of that sedative (Midazolam) during peak covid a public airing. .
As it is he’ll be denounced for sure and whatever substance he has will likely go with him :slightly_frowning_face:

Plenty of big issues have arisen from the covid and vaccines that the middle sector of people will want to see explained and dealt with (and he is almost uniquely placed given he is willing to push this) but they will probably turn off when they see how far he is reaching and probably wrongly equate that with the believability of his eyewitness evidence

1 Like

You analyse the tactics cannily, bro. Still, something funny is going on with that desperate effort to get everyone injected. There has to be some motivation driving that on. What is it, beyond money-grubbing…?

I guess I can ‘pray in aid’, as George Galloway likes to put it, Jim Kunstler’s blog for today. He too sees something distinctly weird going in with the stabs-crusade…

Biden Breaking Bad | Kunstler

I agree that he’s strayed outside of his knowledge bse.

[quote=“Evvy_dense, post:3, topic:2056”]
It might also get the widespread use (and pre-ordering) of that sedative (Midazolam) during peak covid a public airing.[/quote]

You should read the Bernicians private prosecution on this subject. Assuming the Bernician’s data is correct, there can be little doubt that Midazolam is an unpublicised genocide case.

Let me observe again: John’s ‘knowledge base’ seems to have expanded a good deal from his first appearances as an undertaker testifying to his own direct experiences and those of his colleagues in the trade, to whom he had been speaking already. That expansion is apparent in the fluent way he now precis ideas which he could barely articulate in the beginning. He - and others - have been doing a lot of catching up through shared testimony.

He repeats in the SP interview that he has been deluged with whistleblower messages recently, “too many to answer them all” as he says. I’ve seen this process before: someone puts out some modest personal experience material into a public forum, gets a lot of feedback, and finds him/herself expanding his/her original understanding of the matter in hand, simply from all the discussion and multiple testimony input by all involved.

IS that straying outside one’s knowledge base? Maybe outside the original insight umbra caused by one’s own direct experience. But all of us have experience of expanding beyond just that, into the penumbra, by studying the testimony of others - and, of course, doing a running estimate all the time of who seems to be a sound witness, so that their experience can be included at second hand into one’s own.

That’s the very basis of study, isn’t it? Learning reliable testimony from others?

I get at once the dangerous apparent looniness with which John can be tarred, by all who are not yet able to entertain the extremely unsettling ideas which he’s propounding. But think: the tide will continue to run; increasing numbers of people will go through the Fuellmich/Yeadon Transformation - as they themselves described their conversions - and what was seen to be simply risible cloud-cuckoo stuff a year ago transforms into rather solid conviction, under the pressure of accumulating evidence.

Reiner and Mike are both now saying something similar to John, about the underlying purpose being served by the scamdemic. Are they all non-credible? Or are there still a lot of naively-trusting mooncalves who need urgently to doff their moonery, and see with the same cold awful clarity? It is awful. But better to have those horrifying insights dawn on you in good time, rather than to walk willingly into the gas chambers, still lost in delusions of trust.

It’s a process which I would estimate Reiner, Mike and John have all gone through, with many, many more following suite right now.

And let’s not forget that practical work has already begun amongst principled self-motivators to devise healing protocols to halt, and even to repair and cure, the damage which the already-injected have suffered, and will suffer. All is not lost, just because you’ve been lured into taking the stabs, and now you’re beginning to feel buyer’s remorse. Help is coming…

2 Likes

Mark Sexton. Same meeting by the sound of it…

A short update today with Max Igan…

Again, I don’t feel that going too far down the rabbit hole is the way to go with this, with regard to persuading ‘normies’ (‘normies’ is a lovely term that’s come out of all this).

I agree that the next four to six months are going to be absolutely grim.

If you thought the first eighteen months were bad, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

And what you have to remember in all this, is that it’s all been carefully engineered (the collapse of the global economy, etc).

2 Likes

Carefully engineered may be the wrong adjective, Rob. Sloppily engineered during a rushed, panicky response feels more like it. True, a lot of previous-years planning has gone into this scam. But in the event it seems to have been triggered prematurely, by panic amongst the PTsB. And therein lies the strategic advantage for the resistance: the globo-gics rushed the scam, and they’re making increasingly-visible screw-ups in its execution. The worse the poison-stabs’ adverse-reaction massacre gets, the more people are going to be jerked out of their trances by the hard slap across the face of non-negotiable reality.

That feels to me like a dam perilously close to breaking.

And btw Rob, thanks for the extra bit of conversation between Max I. and John. Interesting that John several times called the pol “a minister”! And his assessment that this stiff already knew the truth of what they were saying. You can see why John has grown a lot more radical, with all that he’s going through right now. Credibility-considerations notwithstanding, I think he and others of like mind should go on pushing the envelope of what can be said to the goodthinkers. We need to see a whole lot more people getting these earth-shaking conversions. It’s not easy stuff to go through. But it’s essential - en masse.

2 Likes

Max Igan’s latest one about the situation in Australia…

I don’t know where this is all heading over the coming months.

It doesn’t bode well.

2 Likes

This raises the question, was the MP part of the NWO and hence well informed and fully in tune the global policy. As John said, the people we need to engage with are not governments!

1 Like

Good points there @RhisiartGwilym. I tend to agree though that people should stick to the areas in which they are difficult to undermine with Fact Check whataboutery.

Caveat: the universe is large and complex and everything interrelates, the divisions into subjects/fields/disciplines etc is unrealistic and is used to slap down upstarts who stray outside “their” area.

From The Order Of Things:

This book first arose out of a passage in Borges, out of the laughter that shattered, as I read the passage, all the familiar landmarks of my thought — our thought, the thought that bears the stamp of our age and our geography — breaking up all the ordered surfaces and all the planes with which we are accustomed to tame the wild profusion of existing things, and continuing long afterwards to disturb and threaten with collapse our age-old distinction between the Same and the Other. This passage quotes a “certain Chinese encyclopedia” in which it is written that “animals are divided into: (a) belonging to the Emperor, (b) embalmed, (c) tame, (d) sucking pigs, (e) sirens, (f) fabulous, (g) stray dogs, (h) included in the present classification, (i) frenzied, (j) innumerable, (k) drawn with a very fine camelhair brush, (1) et cetera, (m) having just broken the water pitcher, (n) that from a long way off” look like flies”. In the wonderment of this taxonomy, the thing we apprehend in one great leap, the thing that, by means of the fable, is demonstrated as the exotic charm of another system of thought, is the limitation of our own, the stark impossibility of thinking that.

And I’ve moaned before about video as supposed means of communication. We only get one life (that we’re conscious of, at any rate). Even a 2000 word text can be skimmed before investing 15 minutes in reading it.

If 100000 people sit through a linear 15 minute video that is 25000 hours in which other, more constructive, things might have been achievable. Three years-ish in aggregate. Energy diverted away from real resistance.

A lot of this stuff is being put out to waste time, to divert, to muddy the waters. I don’t claim that this undertaker is part of that but all he needs to have said can be captured in 3 minutes (and was, initially). If he’s really struggling with an inbox full of thousands of messages how much potentially wasted time does that represent?