Not that I believe a friggin word that the government or any of their appointed bodies say, but this is directly from SPI-M-O
“This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines.”
It goes on to say "This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective …"
Go figure, or perhaps explain to me why I should happily stick my arm out (or maybe just my middle finger)?
The line of reasoning in that paper was that the vaxxxed were predominantly older people (due to the rollout in age cohorts, mainly) and that Coroni disproportionately hits older people harder, so the hospitalised would tend to be jabbed folks. But one didn’t cause the other, oh no.
The state of play seems to be that unvaxxxed folks are the majority of patients but proportionately quite a lot less likely to die. Which must be because unvaxxxed equals younger equals more likely to survive. Definitely not because of jabs.
The interesting time will be when the vaxed suckers have their next encounter with wild flu pathogens, this Autumn. Just how big - or mild, or non-existent - will the ADE catastrophe turn out to be? If it gets noticeably large, that should be another blow to the scammers’ credibility. Though of course they’ll try to spin it as a consequence of the obduracy of the wicked (domestic-terrrrrst?) refuseniks. But if it’s happening mainly to vax-suckers, that excuse is going to have difficulty getting airborne. I suppose that will draw the counter-whinge that ‘they should have had the booster stabs’ but they didn’t, so it’s their fault. BPh gangster-profits are always sacrosanct, and come what may we must all serve them.
Quite possibly but that raises the awkward question as to why the doubly deceived would become hesitant all of a sudden? The nefarious influence of bad people spreading online harms? Complacency? Those could both be spun out, with a sudden, alas, critical shortage of Magic Pfotion as the fall back.