5 Filters

Set your Pfizer to Stunned V

Having pointed out last month that the FDA had looked through Pfizer’s documents in a mere 108 days in order to license the vaccine, Siri questioned why the agency now required a whopping 20,000 days to make the same documents public.

As someone says BTL, either the above is correct and they are delaying for nefarious reasons (as is most probable) or the FDA didn’t study the documents thoroughly.

3 Likes

Maybe in two or three years someone will put their hand up and say “Could we get some temps in?” A mere three more years of votes and counter votes, budget setting etc, and jobs a good 'un.

Oh, wait, the scanner’s borked.

2 Likes

Following on…I don’t think this has been posted:

FDA documents show over 150K serious adverse events in first 3 months of Pfizer jab approval

The whole article is worth reading, but these bits jumped out:

"Among reported adverse events were some 25,957 cases of nervous system disorders, 17,283 musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, 14,096 gastrointestinal disorders, 8,848 respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, 8,476 skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and 4,610 infections and infestations. "

It’s hard to get your head round these numbers, which Pfizer are fighting tooth and nail to avoid revealing.
Though they obviously arise from bigger numbers of vaccinated people, they still seem very high for such a short time period.

" According to the data, the vast majority of the events occurred in women (29,914) compared with men (9,182)."
“The largest proportion of adverse events based on age occurred in people age 31-50 (13,886), an age range generally at low risk of serious effects from the virus the drug is designed to treat.”

In other words, the people most likely to have serious adverse reactions are the people who will obtain the least covid benefit from the vaccines.

Whatever the numbers, it seems clear that Pfizer and the complicit FDA will neither reveal them nor take appropriate action.

3 Likes