5 Filters

Richard D Hall loses harrassment case re Manchester Arena event - repost

Politics
#1

High folks - I don’t know whether anyone has followed the persecution of Richard D Hall with regard to his expressed opinions on the Manchester Arena Event of 2017, but the legal case against him has saddled him with a loss of a civil case of harrassment and possibly breach of data handling rules.

Hall’s film :

Iain Davis book free on sign up to website and his 4 parter:

The harrassment civil charge moved to a legal move seeking “summary judgement” which involves the judge looking at the evidence and saying the defendant has no hope and so a judicial decision can disregard the whole of the evidence the defence proposes to put forward - which is exactly what happened. At a time when Hall had no formal legal counsel:

In looking at the reasons for granting summary judgement the judge took into consideration a judicial enquiry on the case of Salman Albadi see:

and also regarded the conviction of Salman’s brother Hashem Abedi as proof of various issues.
https://www.gmp.police.uk/news/greater-manchester/news/news/2020/march/a-man-who-conspired-with-his-brother-to-carry-out-a-terror-attack-that-killed-22-people-at-the-manchester-arena-has-been-jailed/

Interestingly the case against Hashem Abedi was a jury trial during which the Jury heard no evidence from Hashem as he refused to take part in the proceedings which meant that the only evidence put to the court in the case was that provided by the prosecution without any interrogation from the defence or anyone else. It was a one-sided case! In which case how is it possible to draw any conclusions from that case?

Anyway the net result for Hall was that he could not present any of his evidence that he relied on in relation to the Manchester Arena event and so the result was actually predetermined by the summary judgement!

For those of you interested in stitching - dig into this.

cheers

PS note the press release here:

we might have a very small window in which to download all the relevant material before the heavy hand of the injunction deletes everything!

PS It’s interesting that the judicial games just take the Arena official script as read and find no reason to look at the evidence, in fact they have done everything to avoid looking at the evidence in a court of law!

I should have mentioned more on Hashem Abedi who was given 50 years + lifetime monitoring in a case that only evidence from the prosecution was heard unchallenged. To be honest I asked myself is this guy really in prison or was he quietly released like his brother? But then that would make me a consp…!

.

1 Like
#2

Not really aware of this. I know the event itself was suspicious.

A comment from telegram;

Why don’t The Hibberts just release Their Medical Records to the Media. The date and Hospital where their treatment took place will be on them and conclusively Prove that they are telling the Truth and Ruin Richard D Hall’s Reputation. After All They Don’t Have Anything To Hide Do They :thinking::thinking:

1 Like
#3

Suspicious? Perhaps one could conclude that from the media coverage. However, we all know the lamestream does nothing but shill for the establishment.

Just like every false flag, being awake but not focused, they are all suspicious. But looking at the evidence, of any of the too many to mention BS psy ops, one might almost say any suspicious event means it’s a false flag psy op.

Richard Hall has done a decent job of exposing the BS and is now having to pay the price.

3 Likes
#4

here’s ID’s view so far on the trial of Hall:

cheers

2 Likes
#5

Here’s ID’s Part 2:

cheers

1 Like