5 Filters

Remember remember the 21st of December. Now it's getting interesting. The Bernician

Michael O’Bernica talk the talk. However, he also knows how to (and has proven he does) walk the walk. My abbreviated summary of his blog below. Share widely.

Seemingly against all the odds and despite the unavoidable delays caused by the nefarious machinations of our adversaries and their minions, the charges in the Midazolam Murders case are finally set to be laid on the 21st of December, at a Magistrates Court which shall remain a secret, until such time that the proceedings initiated against Hancock et al have been properly administered by a District Judge.

… we have built a case upon the expert and eye witness testimony of eighteen witnesses, including six doctors, five nurses, an undertaker and seven family members of victims, as well as two survivors of attempted murder on wards in two major English hospitals.

… we have established what a highly experienced and knowledgeable barrister recently described as “an unbeatable case”, given that we can prove every aspect of each co-conspirator’s offences, from Hancock down to the mobile assassins who delivered the fatal doses of Midazolam in the care homes.

More simplistically put, we can demonstrate with expert and eye witness testimony, publicly available documentary evidence and Matt Hancock’s confession before the House of Commons COVID-19 inquiry in April 2020, that targeted demographics are being murdered under ‘NHS care’, as a matter of long-established government policy.

… [the] international task-force has the means to file conspiracy to commit mass murder charges wherever the accused are located and irrespective of political office.

… we also now have three leading advocates at our disposal, each of whom specializes in winning onerous fraud and murder cases against high profile defendants. Thereby all but eliminating the risk of sabotage from within and guaranteeing that the charges will be laid by a barrister, rather than a PUB trustee

… it was unanimously agreed that our initial focus should be doing whatever it takes to get the Midazolam Murders case heard by a Common Law Jury.

Furthermore, the continued malevolent pretense of both the UK Government and the MHRA that adverse events following the Pfizer jab are rare occurrences is yet more proof that what they are actually engaged in is a worldwide Vaxxtermination Program.

Given that PUB’s case will be the first to proceed in a criminal court on the 21st of December and because almost every government, the UN and the WHO are likely to be named as defendants to charges of crimes against humanity, there is currently only one possible jurisdiction within which it will be possible to hear such charges – the jurisdiction created by the Treaty of Universal Community Trust, the only government free jurisdiction in existence.

In the absence of the oft-promised ‘Nuremberg 2’, we will in due course convene a Supreme Grand Jury, under the well-established conventions of the UCT Treaty, where every defendant in the conspiracy to commit genocide will be held to account for their crimes.

For the purposes of which, a Common Law Peacekeeping Force is forming across the world, comprised mainly of former police and armed forces personnel, who represent the majority of those still serving, none of whom are willing to continue taking the orders of obviously rogue and criminal governments.

If you haven’t already [and even if you have], please watch and share it with everybody you know.

1 Like

Not sure what to make of this, but definitely worth keeping an eye on

O’Bernicia has spent a massive amount of time, energy etc. on this. Good luck to him we say. But what will he do when the CPS takes over the prosecution then drops it?

You have to assume that there’s a working* legal system somewhere in 5Eyes-EUrostan? Well, are you feeling lucky, punk?


*Working in the sense that it will actually do what it claims on the silk-wrapped tin that it’s supposed to do.

I’m with you on the “good luck to him”. As for the CPS taking it over, he does have a long history of fighting the legal system in the UK, when everything is stacked against him and the the judiciary are bent. However, why would the CPS take over a private prosecution? Can they even do that?

CPS website: Private Prosecutions | The Crown Prosecution Service

“However, there will be instances where it is appropriate for the CPS to exercise the Director’s powers under section 6(2) POA 1985, either to continue the prosecution or to discontinue or stop it.”

I think it will turn out that a prosecution would be discovered to be not in the public interest. Here’s a historic attempt which didn’t even get that far:

https://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/294918.stm

Interesting story. Look who brought it up in the Commons. And look how different the treatment was in those days of people awaiting extradition hearings!!! FFFS

1 Like

These are three longish post by O’Bernica on the case against the criminals (read the case and one can’t argue the use of that word) Hancock, Whitty and Valance. There is probably a fourth to come on the case against “you lockdown while I sneak out for a shag Ferguson”.

2 Likes

Re Hancock: This from 25/4/19, pre-any emergency (or confection thereof):

"Health Secretary Matt Hancock has said he “wouldn’t rule out anything” when asked whether unvaccinated children should be banned from schools.

Speaking on Talk Radio, Mr Hancock said the UK was “not there yet” when it came to issuing a ban, as has happened in US states, France and Italy."

Sounds like the emergency may have been that Bill was getting shirty, and threatening to save some other planet :wink:

2 Likes

Good find.

The devils are all here.