Noticed this key study back in Feb 2025 I don’t recall seeing it here.
“
v1
Reevaluating Viral Transmission: A Critical Examination of Virological Methods and Assumptions
Authors/Creators
[Matthew, Matthew North]
Description
This paper critically evaluates the foundational principles of virology, focusing on viral transmission, which underpin the broader scientific claims about the existence and pathogenicity of viruses. A thorough examination reveals significant empirical gaps and methodological limitations. Historical and contemporary studies are reviewed to highlight the lack of consistent evidence supporting person-to-person viral transmission, often relying on proxies such as molecular detection rather than direct causality. By addressing these shortcomings, this paper challenges the conventional paradigms of virology and their implications for public health strategies, including vaccination and quarantine measures. This work aims to foster a critical reassessment of virological methods and assumptions, promoting a more robust scientific framework for understanding diseases.“
I haven’t read it yet but if true it removes one of the pillars supporting 15 Minute Cities! Leaving only “climate change” as an official excuse and I hate to use this link but this is what Sky oz is now saying:
I tell people again and again that “You can’t catch a virus”. I still get dismissed as if I’m a nut job. I simply tell them to look up the Rosenau experiments of 1918.
There seems to be little of this still on the web, but Arthur Firstenberg’s book has a graphic description of these experiments, all of which failed to show transmission.
Anyone seriously interested in the question would benefit from reading Mark Bailey’s ‘A Farwell to Virology’, downloadable since 2022, now available in hard copy:-
All the ways to get it are linked at that site. There’s also a mammoth (but actually very watchable!) 3-part video series. (Dr. Sam also links to her quicky video for time-challenged or low concentration people, so something for everyone).
There are a number of good books referring to Rosenau etc. The most comprehensive is probably the most recent, Daniel Roytas’ 2024 'Can You Catch a Cold?’* which gives details of over 200 experiments attempting to prove ‘viral transmission’.
Trouble is mostly the reluctance of people to even contemplate the possibility of malfeasance/negligence/cupidity/stupidity being enshrined in any ‘official’ doctrine/institution/narrative. It is of course very threatening to the stability of their world view and it takes a while to incorporate that kind of uncertainty into your thinking while keeping your feet on the ground. The more the bastards threaten us the more people want to cling to ‘certainties’ eh? Representative Democracy anyone? Don’t get me started.
Hi folks, I was looking at Valentina Zharkova’s latest material and came across this reference in Wikipedia:
and this section looked interesting ( and vaguely understandable unlike the rest of the article!) :
" The expansion of this summary curve of two PCs, or EVs, up to 3000 years backwards shown that the summary curve reveals many Grand Solar Minima in the past, like named ones: Maunder, Wolf, Oort in last two millennia plus also the Homeric minimum about 800 years in the millennium BC (see Fig.8)[19].
Fig.8. Solar activity index derived from the summary curve of eigen vectors[19] (blue line) versus the solar activity index derived from the isotopes C14 abundances in the terrestrial biomass (red line) (Solanki et al.[20]).
The most GSMs in the Holocene were nicely recovered by the summary curve index shown in Fig.8[19], besides Spoerer’s solar minimum[21]. This is likely related to the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) intensity in the times of Spoerer minimum, which was strongly affected by the explosion of supernova Vela Junior at the close distance of 650 light years from the Sun. This supernova explosion significantly increased the GCR background leading to the potential errors in calculating the timing from C14 isotopes by up to 300 years[22]. In fact, this paper shows that the visual observations of large sunspots by Chinese astronomers, Aurora Borealis large intensities, the ice areas reduction in Greenland, the temperature variations and the increase of viral diseases on Earth during this period, all indicate to strong GCRs(Galactic Cosmic Rays) and a maximum of solar activity and not the minimum as it was claimed."
So apart from re-emphasising her projection of a Global Solar Minimum between 2020 and 2053 bringing severe areas of global cooling in the world - not global warming! - destroying the CO2 nonsense which underpins the UN policies of 15 Minute Cities - it points to another reason for widespread global diseases: Galactic Cosmic Rays. These Galactic Cosmic Rays have been created by major events in the Universe outside the Solar System light years earlier! No-one is talking about this but the idea has I think been around for some time but because it undermines the Viral Transmission theory ( and accordingly not funded) has not been examined by mainstream science!
I could see no reference to GCRs in the paper by North or in Mark Bailey’s paper as another way of explaining widespread patterns of disease.
