Hi folks I was just watching the excellent uk column :
specifically about the MHRA and I noticed one aspect of the MHRA board meeting which they appeared to miss.
UKC pointed out that MHRA wanted to increase the number of reports from individual sufferers without asking why? Maybe UKC thinks the point is obvious but just in case they missed it, my own paranoid view is that the MHRA are beginning to be embarrassed by the massive number of reports on the Yellow Card system from the medically trained. I suspect it is no longer possible to dismiss reports because they are only coming from uneducated victims and their families - the white coats could well be reporting in large numbers - this is a problem as it upsets MHRA’s mission statement, supportive of big Pharta.
Early on in 2021 there were dismissive memes, generated in the MSM and pro-jab social media, about the Yellow Card system being filled with unproven reports from laymen. I don’t recall any actual numbers being reported but it’s a very easy way to disparage unwelcome data!
No-one seems to ask the MHRA how many medical experts they employ or pay for to investigate all the deaths and serious harms being reported! How many autopsy reports they have examined, how many inquests have they attended etc.
I then recalled the other data gatherer,what was Public Health England, being changed into the UKHSA , S for security! One of the most popular reasons for hiding information from the public is … National Security! So we can look forward to a deafening silence coming from english public health data gatherers, imo.
Add to these 2 points the ONS number fudging and the court’s view that we can only ask for simple data because anything else is open to different interpretations… we are permitting the arses of bureaucRats to be officially covered with reinforced concrete which no amount of questioning will penetrate!
“Democracy” … it would be nice wouldn’t it!
cheers