This happened a few weeks ago but not sure if this was posted before. A pretty hard-hitting (though softly spoken) speech from this ex Vice President of the WHO, even mentioning the Nuremberg code…
https://independentviewpoints.net/prof-perronne-lambasts-vaccines-at-eu-parliament-hearing/
The fact that he is delivering it in this setting suggests the tide is turning.
Not seen this before. Thanks Willem. It’s dynamite! The tide has to turn, and sweep all the guilty criminals behind this into the dock at a global Nurnberg 2! Effing pronto!
Cheers Willem
He’s got interesting company - surrounded by some goodly dissidents. Ann-Marie Kim, ace biologist who seems pretty expert in Sars-cov2 and its origins, and who spoke with Perronne before on UKColumn in a much praised no-holds-barred,
and Dr Benoit Ochs, a Belgian doc who has been in hot water the last year for questioning masks and vaccines and treating (probably curing, the biggest sin obviously 
) covid patients early with unapproved meds. He copped a ban but is appealing it so is still able to practice - court verdict expected in March I think. He gets a couple of mentions in the UK Column video, and is another reporting high D Dimer in vaxed patients, suggesting microclots. (Recall a Dr Hoffe in Canada also getting flak for this.)
Perronne’s testimony reported here
Dr. Christian Perronne, a Professor of Infectious and Tropical Diseases at the University of Versailles-St Quentin who previously was chairman of the French National Technical Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization and vice-chairman of the European Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization at the World Health Organization, at a January 12 debate on child vaccination at the Luxembourg parliament slammed corruption related to the COVID crisis during the past two years.
“I would have two main messages to tell you in this crisis: We have flouted science and we have flouted rights," he said, according to a translation provided by “The Washup” Twitter account.
“We flouted science because all the decisions of our politicians are based on experts who, unfortunately - we know now, it’s public - have major conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry,” he said, adding that decisions are made while providing “zero scientific references.”
On the other hand, he said he has written two books “that have never been contested on a scientific basis and in which there are dozens of pages of proof - everything I say is referenced.”
“I have never changed my opinion in two years and no one has ever corrected me on any single claim, even if the media every day say that I am a conspiracy theorist because that’s they only word they have, since they can’t find any arguments.”
“Then, when there was so-called scientific proof we saw fraud accumulate,” he continued, noting “publications in the world’s greatest journals that were fraudulent.”
“You all remember Lancetgate, when they wanted to discredit the Chloroquine; well, lobbies paid a team and a journal to release a fraudulent study, which blocked everything in the whole world.”
“More recently in the British Medical Journal there was Pfizergate which showed that a part of the Pfizer studies to obtain authorization for their so-called vaccine was fraudulent. In France, the media never spoke about it except for a small article in Le Figaro. That’s fairly scandalous,” he said, “whereas when the Lancet was released, all the media were talking about it.”
“Conflicts of interest are major, whether they are with experts, with media. This is public. It’s not fake news, it’s not me saying it."
He pointed to the French government which,”in addition to tens of millions of Euros they give to primary media each year, for two years has given 3 billion Euros to media,” despite the fact that “France’s coffers are supposedly empty.”
“That would make a lot of hospitals we could build.”
Turning to “these products that we call vaccines,” he noted that, as one who for years was “considered a vaccine specialist in France, in Europe, in the world,” he believes “the biggest scandal of this epidemic is that we have been made to believe that these are vaccines. They are not at all vaccines.”
“The proof now is we know they don’t work, that they don’t prevent contamination, that they don’t prevent severe outcomes.”
He noted that “in countries that are the most vaccinated, we can see that more than 90% in intensive care are double and triple vaccinated.”
"That it doesn’t prevent transmission [is] the formal proof that these are not vaccines.”
“We need to stop this delirium of wanting to vaccinate for an illness which almost doesn’t kill anymore. Where are the deaths?"
Dr. Perronne said that “A lot of figures have been inflated, because with these PCR that are amplified above what is scientifically authorized - normally - we have inflated the epidemic’s figures, we have inflated the number of deaths. People who arrived at the hospital for other things, if they have a positive test, we said they died of COVID when they died absolutely of something else.”
“And then what shocked me enormously, as a vaccine specialist, is that for a normal vaccine it takes 10 years for it to be authorized. When I see the scandal with pregnant women … Normally it takes 10 years after definite authorization, of commercial use, for it to be authorized for a pregnant woman, with enough hindsight,” he said, while in the case of the COVID shot “in a few months it was authorized.”
“What shocks me is the absence of scientific studies on these decisions. When our governments say it takes 3 doses, soon 4 doses, 5 doses, 6 doses, 7 doses - we don’t know - there is zero scientific data to support these decisions.
“What shocks me greatly is the European Medicines Agency admitted last summer that they did not know the full composition of these vaccines, and despite that they authorize it.
“What we now know officially based on databases is that the vaccines caused 36,000 deaths in Europe, 25,000 in the USA, including hundreds of athletes,” he said, adding that data from the US “showed there is an increase in deaths from cancer following vaccination.”
“I think the best example is that the countries which did not vaccinate, or which stopped vaccination, are the countries where the epidemic is over,” he continued, citing the example of India.
“The last word is on rights. I would say that all of it is illegal, since as it was stated earlier, a conditional use authorization can only be obtained if we have demonstrated that there are no effective treatments.” However, “We have hundreds of published studies, the example of India and other countries which show that there are effective treatments.”
“And especially, the most important is that we are still in phase 3 experimentation and that by international treaties including the Nuremberg code, it is totally forbidden to impose an obligation for an experimental product."
He said “parliamentarians who vote to obligate an experimental product […] can be personally prosecuted in an international court for an extremely grave error: endangering the lives of human beings.”
“Since we’re talking about children, I will finish on this: There are children dying from the vaccine, and now we know that those that die from the vaccine are more numerous than those who die from COVID, because there are practically zero deaths from COVID.”
He said he personally knew of a 17 year old girl and 20 year old girl who died of pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction following vaccination.
“I ask for a moratorium on these products that are not vaccines, were not evaluated in a correct way, for which we will have definitive evaluations in many years,” he concluded
Wow, fancy this getting out, yes the tide must be turning. Thanks Willem.
Great to see these type of testimonies increasing.
Note, 6 minutes into delivering this most grave testimony, Perronne is hurried along by Mme Nancy Arendt, and told he has 1 minute maximum remaining to make his points!! Astonishing!
Arendt, too - now there’s a name with which to conjure - - talk about ‘banal’ - I mean, what business could possibly be so important that it neccessitated curtailing Perronne’s plea?
Thanks for the links E_d. Good to see such strong criticism from people who are not easy to dismiss. It’s very encouraging. I feel that if just some of the mainstream media picks up on these experts, the house of cards could quite rapidly fall. The media are quick to turn sides if they feel the wind blows in a new direction and they may be left behind.
Absolutely awful by the way when Perronne describes (in that UK column) what happened in Vietnam – with the jabs making the disease return:
" In Vietnam, for example, it was an amazing success, they had only a few dozen deaths over more than a year, [the epidemic] was finished, and then one of the ministers said, “We have to vaccinate the whole population!” It’s now nearly mandatory, and after the start of this vaccination campaign, the epidemic came back and fatal cases occurred again . That’s proof that these inoculations are not a vaccine, but may facilitate the reappearance of the disease and also of deaths."
Thanks WIllem. That struck me true about Vietnam, so I went and checked the data, and it’s true - about 50 deaths, from memory, in the first year.
Perrone has been so frank he sounds harsh by comparison, like Raoult. He and Raoult are pressed into undiplomatic language by frustration at the intransigence of their colleagues, and of course their badgering. It would be interesting to read Perronne’s book to read the inside story of how relations gradually became unbearable - if indeed it was gradual! Cheers
PS About the media - I meant to say there seems to be a steadying of the virus push, if not the vaccine, in many western countries. This might be a chance for the media to do some real reporting before being brought to heel again by the next development.
Britain pours 3 plus billion into the media and Canada for example pours (from memory) 6 plus billion, and of course big pharma and Kill Gates do likewise. Hoping for some real reporting from the lamestream brings to mind the phrase peeing into the wind.
Yep, France is the same. But the leash will be less tight or have less reach when the heat is off, and sometimes they can’t resist a good one.
(Takes out towel 
)