5 Filters

(Podcast) James Delingpole interviews Dr Michael Yeadon

Some seriously sinister and alarming news and views here as Dr Mike Yeadon takes us further down the rabbit hole…

1 Like

The platforms that dissidents use to speak on! Why didn’t he just go on Newsnight? Oh that’s right I forgot…
Watched 16m and Yeadon seemed in guite good form. Delingpole hasn’t said much.

Two good points from Yeadon (not necessarily exact words):

"It’s embarrassing but I took nine months to realize…transmission is by ill people with high viral loads, people you would avoid outside. So outside isn’t the problem, so masks can not the answer.
So where are all the transmissions?
(Ironic voice) Sick people indoors - sounds like it might be…hospitals. A recent study found 70% of transmission was in hospitals. I guess much of the rest is in care homes. "

Abt 15m, …"I spoke to 7 or 8 university profs, all of whom would know about…immunity. Two retreated, of the others none would write an article explaining how immunity works, or comment publicly. They said their universities had policies preventing them from contradicting government policy. …they say “it’s just too difficult, I’ll be pummelled from the top, pummelled by my peers for getting the university into disrepute, and I’ll have difficulty getting funding”. "

Will watch some more tomorrow - thanks for the heads-up Rich!

1 Like

#Covid19, vaccines, immunity and transmissability or symptom suppression.

Thanks for the link, as pointed out MY has some alarming comments which fit with many views on this site. I agree with his vaccine views in the main but raise 2 issues:

  1. he takes the view that these vaccines will provide immunity to those taking the jabs. The object and consensus I thought, was that these vaccines would reduce the symptomatic response to the virus rather than provide immunity.
  2. he fails to comment on the media and political view that the vaccines will prevent transmission of the virus. Even the small print in public health leaflets say they don’t know whether the vaccines will prevent the injectee from being infected nor whether they will transmit the virus to others after injection!

I was also disappointed that neither D nor Y mentioned treatment regimes that have been shown to radically reduce the impact of the virus if anyone becomes infected or even as prophylactic precautionary measures. To my mind these make vaccines unnecessary particularly if the latter have potential serious side affects and the simple treatments are free of side affects.

cheers

1 Like

Thanks Rich. Just got round to hearing this. I’ve always been pretty anti-Delingfart, but credit where it’s due, he’s doing a worthwhile job here, not least because he just raises a topic or a question briefly, then lets Mike talk uninterrupted. Well worth the whole 66 minutes.

As well as the other reservations raised in this thread, I’d point out the odd extra ones, which by the way apply as much to Geert van den Bossche as to Mike Yeadon: Both troo-bleevers at the Big Pharma fountainhead of holy-vaccine writ. Both professionals long steeped in precisely that BPh racket-field, and yet both forthrightly saying: Don’t touch THESE vaccines, because something bad, and unadmitted, is going on, and they’re unproven and dangerous.

People have argued all sorts of hidden motivations into those apparent incongruities. But I seem to hear, listening to them - Geert and Mike - men who are, yes, still very much under the influence of their long-held, career-reinforced belief systems about the nature of health and the nature of medical practice, but who nevertheless see something so stark in the covid scam - an outright Big Lie, the way Mike tells it - that their consciences just won’t allow them to stay silent.

Let the obvious inconsistencies pass for the moment. Who amongst us is as rationally consistent as Spock or Data? Acknowledge instead that these appear to be two straight operators, telling a straight tale, because they feel that they must. Critical stuff!

1 Like

I’m more of a Frei supporter on Bossche, but open to the opposite view being shown over time. I’m not sure about MY, he attacks the liars, Johnson, Government, the MSM, politicians like Blair and Sag- and yet ( if I recall the podcast correctly) he doesn’t target the pharma companies specifically or Gates, just an error or job/ass covering?

cheers