5 Filters

Planning for the scamdemic. 2015 & 2017 patents specifically mentions "Covid 19"

A Dutch patent in 2015 followed by a US patent in 2017, says:

"A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection, such as COVID-19 [my emphasis].

The method includes using a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage, which is transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone.

To ensure that the data is accurate, an accelerometer within the smartphone is used to measure movement of the smartphone and/or the user.

Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19.

Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions."

Richard A Rothschild is the patent holder!

Have you read through all this in any detail, Pat, links and all? Their grasp on the idea of ‘adequate proof’ seems shaky, to put it kindly. At one point, one of the writers suggests that by looking out of a plane window whilst flying over the US, you can see that the continent is ‘nearly empty’; as are many other parts of the world, apparently.This statement alone shoves the website instantly into flat-earther wilful-self-delusion territory. I wonder also about these ‘hundreds of medical professionals’ who have denounced the plandemic, in several countries apparently. I’ve seen some - both credible and highly creditable - dissenting statements by groups of principled doctors and other pros., about what is the right approach to the disease, but ‘hundreds’ - in several countries - all saying this is a planned scam?

I have to wonder whether this - previously unknown - site is actually an astroturf roll-out by some libertarian-loony, acute right-wing disinformation outfit. These internet displays are so easy to mock up and launch these days. They seem sold on the daft idea that ‘there’s no over-population problem’. A typical rightloony-marker, usually hung on the ‘anti-eugenics’ canard. (Sure, the eugenics doctrines exist, and deserve to be trashed, but are they really widely espoused?)

This material doesn’t smell right. There’s a distinct smell of axe-grinding.

Those alleged patents, though, if genuine, suggest further investigation might be useful. Did they really include the phrase ‘covid19’, several years before 2019? When exactly did that popular designation of the pathogen first appear? Also, anything with consigliere Tony Fauci’s fingerprints on it has to be a good candidate for something crooked going on; as also for the Bellender Gates duo.

Any sound information about all this surely needs filtering out from the right-wing fantasy stuff, to be given some careful attention. If true, it is indeed a bombshell. Even loony messengers can deliver a sound, true message! :slight_smile: An interested watching brief seems the best stance, for now. Hope you can dig up more of this data-trail, P. Be interested to see what comes out.

As I remember, it was Tedros Gabriesus who gave us the “COVID 19” around the start of February, which had been decided upon for various reasons. As you say Rhis, if we can actually find a webpage dated 2017 or 18 with the words CoviD on it, then this is something concrete. I wouldn’t be entirely surprised if this were the case given the silence about Event 201, and the WEF meeting that seems to launch the “plan”, but I need to also be convinced that the virus didn’t leak from Fort Detrick intentionally.
In fact when considering the possibility of intentional release, the whole story of the cases in the W Virginia aged care home becomes hard to explain. If they had leaked it intentionally it would surely have been done differently, and reported differently. And of course the whole plan has little Fauci’s dirty little mits all over it!

FWIW I meant to say "“didn’t leak accidentally” - from FD. If it was leaked intentionally, then taking it to the Wuhan games should have been the first instance. It’s only a year ago.

My bad. I looked at what they claim is the patent. I can’t check for real with the US patents office without payment, but what they claim is the patent, looks to me to be a real patent but for a mobile phone app to do with fitness! And the site it came from is a looney site with ocassional nuggets!

However, to add to what @Dimac said, it seems to me the overwhelming weight of circumstantial evidence makes this all a pre-planned agenda.

  • Fort Detrick and the unexplained Virginia care home cases
  • Event 201
  • Rockerfeller Lockstep agenda from 2010
  • UN agenda 2020 and 2030
  • Disappearance of HCQ from every pharmacy (certainly in France where it had been an over the counter medicine for 50 plus years)
  • Fauci’s funding of a Chinese bio-lab with US taxpayers cash
  • IMF attempted bribe of Belarus government if they locked down
  • Modification of the Georgia guide stones (I forget the year but around 2018)

I could go on.

And now the “syndemic”, combining all sorts of nefarious agendas.

Looked at in total, I can only see one conclusion. Scamdemic, with outcomes too horrible to contemplate.

Your summary is quite shocking, Pat. And yes, it points to some sort of nefarious scam going on amongst the world’s gics. You have to wonder: how much was pre-planned, how much was band-waggon-leaping opportunism by assorted gic famiglie and coteries as they noticed the chances opening up with an adventitious epidemic, but not quite amounting to a literal conspiracy? And was it really entirely adventitious, or helped along a little by some nefarious gain-of-function jiggery pokery by the likes of consigliere Fauci?

The evidence which you summarise - and as you say, only a partial list at that - obviously demonstrates a certain anticipation of waves of epidemic diseases, and gic-gangs discussing amongst themselves how these could be turned to use for the gics’ perennial addictive chasing after ever more of their WealthPowerStatus drug.

I still find myself unable to decide firmly whether this whole covid nonsense was pre-planned, or simply welcomed on the fly as the big opportunity that all the gic gatherings - such as the WEF crowd - had been foreseeing; and, of course, planning for. Enterprising opportunism, rather than deliberate creation? Anything which profitably enslaves and exploits the world and its human and other cattle even further than we are already, being of constant interest to gics.

Sounds as if I have an obsessive fixation on the gangsters-in-charge class of humans, doesn’t it? One of those simplistic doctrines which says: ‘If only we can just get rid of - insert favourite obsession-target - the world would become a paradise; so - we must KILL them all!! It’s a sacred, god-mandated duty!!’ What you might call the ‘Mein Kampf’ delusion.

Not really. I don’t really think that (quoting Stewart Lee :slight_smile: ). I do see them, though, as a perennial global problem, to be recognised and managed; an intractable problem embedded in basic human psychology. But the solution to their destructiveness has always seemed to me to be complete expropriation of all their wealth, and therefore of the power and status which always accompanies it, and reduction to ordinary rank-and-file status. But - with a permanent watching brief on them, since once a psychopath, always a psychopath. Never to be trusted entirely.

Of course, getting to that improved social arrangement does entail recognising that the world has a gic problem to begin with. That doesn’t yet seem to be as universal as it needs to be. The sort of thing that they get up to, compulsively, permanently, is a global social problem for all societies. The sort of thing, in fact, which you list above, Pat…

International law forbidding excessive wealth above a certain level for absolutely everyone, everywhere, no exceptions ever, would be a start. Ah - ‘impossible’ dreams, eh? :laughing: