This report is is one of them. At least, the headline is - Andrew Wakefield is only a co-author.
CHD may have an eye to attracting wavering support. The media will also use his name to denounce it.
A link to the study/report can be found here (link says McCullough Foundation report)
Not sure if the " BREAKING - Andrew Wakefield Study: Vaccines Cause Autism" is yours @Evvy_dense or from the study. Either way, my only comment on this is itâs hardly âbreakingâ. Any red pilled person will have known this for some time.
On the issue of eye scans, Iâm with Sandi Adams (whom I find painful to listen to because of um, constant ums). The fact that the eye scanners include in their privacy policy, âWe share our data with âŚâ should be reason enough for anyone with kids to avoid them at all costs. For my next eye test, I am going to insist on seeing their privacy policy first!
That was the headline to CHDâs email subcriber list.
I wouldnât have blasted it with Wakefieldâs name as itâs misleading and provocative, it would put the âblue-pilledâ people off reading it, and they are in the majority; and it also flags to the media to diss it, without reading it. So, counterproductive.
I do like to have tangible evidence for what I âknowâ. Though Iâve not looked through it yet.
On eye scans. Thanks @PatB I had one of these eye scans a couple of weeks ago; didnât think of asking! There was no signature asked for at any point in the eye test; but many âlegitimate reasonsâ for sharing it with any of the companyâs seemingly endless list of âpartnersâ. You can ask them to stop âprocessingâ it but according to their privacy policy they donât have to delete it.
The wording covers everything, but vaguely. I imagine that unless you call a halt they can do what they want.with it; possily even then.
Apparently Sandi Adams will explain more on UKC on Monday.
Just for the record, my comment on hardly breaking news was aimed at the reports puiblishers, not you! 