5 Filters

Pfizer brings us the virus news now

Pfizer highlights need for fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccine to FDA

How is Pfizer allowed to do this - create their own market?

Why aren’t they asking him about this

Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has 1 291 RARE side effects, own report shows

Or the emerging risks in the trove of trial documents they tried to bury.

In a sane world, when grave risks emerge the response is not full speed ahead.

1 Like

Beam me up Scotty. to quote, “The data shows the immune protection against Omicron is very good after three doses, but when it comes against hospitalisation or death, [it is] not as good, but pretty good. But it doesn’t last. After three, four months it starts waning. That’s [for] Omicron only.”

Translation: Very good = good at creating blood clots, damaging immune systems, etc. Double blind trials? What’s that.

Translation: Pretty good = not quite as pricey as the first two shots, but great for the director perks and share price

Translation: But it doesn’t last = It does sweet fanny adams, but the placebo effect works for a month or two and then as honest as the day is long, it [the placebo effect] starts waning.

Translation: It starts waning = That’s when we need to bring in the 5th shot (shareholders cheer and throw their hats in the air)

Does anyone anywhere have any actually-reliable figures for global excess deaths due to the covid-flu? Does anyone even know accurately about global excess deaths from any cause at all?

After two years of quite obviously lying myth-making, we can be confident that the final death toll alleged to the covid-flu will be established in the public mind as substantially higher than it really was. Probably it will take a new generation before the figures are re-visited realistically, as has begun to happen with the flu outbreak at the end of WW1, apparently under the influence of the present hysteria. Not only are those figures now being questioned - how did or does anyone really know? - but the whole legend about where it originated, how infectious and actually deadly it really was, and what were its actual real causes, is also getting reconsidered; even the old doubt about the very existence of ‘deadly viruses’ has been reawakened from a long somnolence; just some of the unintended, unexpected consequences of the great covid swindle.

I suppose that the official legend about ‘the deadly worldwide covid pandemic of 2020-22’ will persist for decades now. That much at least of the manipulation drive has had its effect. But the real truth will ooze out over time. Probably it will only be acknowledged, like so many of these fake fairy tales, several generations later, if ever. And even then only by a minority of scholarly real seekers after truth.

Will Bourla and his ilk ever stand in the dock of a second Nurnberg 2 tribunal? Probably not. I think that by now, too many people are feeling: ‘thank god that whole bloody shambles is now receding into the past! Let’s just forget it and get back to something like normal life.’ Probably there won’t be the popular impetus to nail the crooks behind the swindle, who (and WHO) cried up a somewhat worse than average flu into a manipulated global panic.

And besides, there’s a new bright shining light now to entrance the gics’ cattle: Whenever in need of a distraction, just prime your mediawhores and pocket-pols to shout ‘Russia! Russia! Russia! Aaaaaaargh!’ :roll_eyes: