5 Filters

One for the 'Engine'-eers

#1

What would you expect to get from your search engine from this search string:

un treaty nuremberg experimental
?

The top choice in Yahoo, Bing, Clusty (Yippy), DuckDuckGo is this pro-vaccine feck-chuck

" [Nuremberg Code Addresses Experimentation, Not Vaccines …]
(Nuremberg Code Addresses Experimentation, Not Vaccines - FactCheck.org)"

Notably, though the concern is against forced vaccination, the fact-checkers only address the straw man about ‘vaccines’.

This does come up further down

Plague of Liars: Nuremberg Code Outlaws Forced Medical Procedures, Which INCLUDES Mandatory Vaccinations

It would be absurd to try to invoke the Nuremberg laws because your mate volunteered to be vaccinated. Another fact check, but no facts checked; shoots straight in at Number One, must be good, eh?

In such stories there are many who argue Nuremberg doesn’t prevent compulsory vaccines, because they are not ‘experimental’, or because, as one professor says, 'It’s because you’re a risk to other people". Looks like legal nonsense to me, but I always think that…
But what beats me is how these search engines (with the curious exception of google) decided to place the pro-vaccine and pro-authoritarian vaccine story at the top - using simply the ‘vaccine’ handle - even though it’s not in the search string.
I’d sure like to see that flowchart!

#2

If you have got to use a search engine, from which of course, you’ll get the globalists list of things they would like one to see (as above), use www.ecosia.org . They use ad revenue to plant trees (and it seems to be legit!)

1 Like
#3

Also, understand that ALL search engines and ALL social media are entirely open to capture and manipulation (as most have been already). And as for that abominable abortion which ought to be called ‘Wikideceivia’… [noises of copious retching]

So - trust none of them; not one!

Believe nothing till you’ve triangulated it within at least three separate sources - AND subjected it where possible to the confirmation of your lying eyes (often possible) and of your lying common sense (always possible).

And you can plant trees for yourself: a green twig of any of the Willow family, broken off and stuck into a patch of damp soil, that’s likely to remain damp round the year, and which has at least a chance of being left alone by the land-manglers, will grow into a tree that outlives you by a century or more. It’s that quick and easy. Been doing it for decades. (I can take you to twenty-foot-tall groves in swampy bits of land, all of which trees I planted less than ten years ago - as six-inch twigs! The whole bucketful collected and planted by hand, without tools, in less than an hour…)

#4

PS: Emoticon function still fully buggered… [smiley by hand: :slight_smile: ]

#5

Thanks Pat. Same results though. I’m hoping there’s an open source search facility somewhere with no frills, but that gives you what you ask it to search for. It’s not just the political intervention that’s the hurdle, it’s the bias towards the ‘popular’ over the specific. Cheers

Edit: it just occurred to me to search for ‘open source search engine’, duh. Found this

Customize your internet with an open source search engine
Get started with YaCy, an open source, P2P web indexer.
Link: Customize your internet with an open source search engine | Opensource.com

Looks like there’s a bit more to it:

"How to a P2P search engine works

YaCy is an open source and distributed search engine. It’s written in Java, so it runs on any platform, and it performs web crawls, indexing, and searching. It’s a peer-to-peer (P2P) network, so every user running YaCy joins in the effort to track the internet as it changes from day to day [ED: so I presume there is a sacrifice in speed?]. Of course, no single user possesses a full index of the entire internet because that would take a data center to house, but the index is distributed and redundant across all YaCy users. It’s a lot like BitTorrent (as it uses distributed hash tables, or DHT, to reference index entries), except the data you’re sharing is a matrix of words and URL associations. By mixing the results returned by the hash tables, no one can tell who has searched for what words, so all searches are functionally anonymous. It’s an effective system for unbiased, ad-free, untracked, and anonymous searches, and you can join in just by using it."

…but might be worth it. Placed on the to do list!

2nd Edit: I know I’m talking to myself, just to finish off, the search engines ask.com and gigablast.com did not prejudice the initial results of this search with an authoritarian pro-vaccine punt :slight_smile:

#6

Apropos the untrustworthiness of ANY media, without constantly-alert caveat emptor:

1 Like
#7

Yes, refreshingly direct and unconcerned with demonstrating how very clever Ed Curtin is. Which is unusual: the first of his for a long time I’ve read to the end. Also the first with no mini hagiography of Bob Dylan.

1 Like