5 Filters

NYT Legitimises Censorship of Dr.Mercola

"SAN FRANCISCO — The article that appeared online on Feb. 9 began with a seemingly innocuous question about the legal definition of vaccines*.* Then over its next 3,400 words, it declared coronavirus vaccines were “a medical fraud” and said the injections did not prevent infections, provide immunity or stop transmission of the disease.

Instead, the article claimed, the shots “alter your genetic coding, turning you into a viral protein factory that has no off-switch.”

Its assertions were easily disprovable. No matter. Over the next few hours, the article was translated from English into Spanish and Polish. It appeared on dozens of blogs and was picked up by anti-vaccination activists, who repeated the false claims online. The article also made its way to Facebook, where it reached 400,000 people, according to data from CrowdTangle, a Facebook-owned tool.

The entire effort traced back to one person: Joseph Mercola.

Dr. Mercola, 67, an osteopathic physician in Cape Coral, Fla., has long been a subject of criticism and government regulatory actions for his promotion of unproven or unapproved treatments. But most recently, he has become the chief spreader of coronavirus misinformation online, according to researchers.

An internet-savvy entrepreneur who employs dozens, Dr. Mercola has published over 600 articles on Facebook that cast doubt on Covid-19 vaccines since the pandemic began, reaching a far larger audience than other vaccine skeptics, an analysis by The New York Times found. His claims have been widely echoed on Twitter, Instagram and YouTube.

The activity has earned Dr. Mercola, a natural health proponent with an Everyman demeanor, the dubious distinction of the top spot in the “Disinformation Dozen,” a list of 12 people responsible for sharing 65 percent of all anti-vaccine messaging on social media, said the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate. Others on the list include Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist, and Erin Elizabeth, the founder of the website Health Nut News, who is also Dr. Mercola’s girlfriend.

  • Thanks for reading The Times.

Subscribe to The Times

“Mercola is the pioneer of the anti-vaccine movement,” said Kolina Koltai, a researcher at the University of Washington who studies online conspiracy theories. “He’s a master of capitalizing on periods of uncertainty, like the pandemic, to grow his movement.”

Some high-profile media figures have promoted skepticism of the vaccines, notably Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham of Fox News, though other Fox personalities have urged viewers to get the shots. Now, Dr. Mercola and others in the “Disinformation Dozen” are in the spotlight as vaccinations in the United States slow, just as the highly infectious Delta variant has fueled a resurgence in coronavirus cases. More than 97 percent of people hospitalized for Covid-19 are unvaccinated, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

President Biden has blamed online falsehoods for causing people to refrain from getting the injections. But even as Mr. Biden has urged social media companies to “do something about the misinformation,” Dr. Mercola shows the difficulty of that task.

Over the last decade, Dr. Mercola has built a vast operation to push natural health cures, disseminate anti-vaccination content and profit from all of it, said researchers who have studied his network. In 2017, he filed an affidavit claiming his net worth was “in excess of $100 million.”

And rather than directly stating online that vaccines don’t work, Dr. Mercola’s posts often ask pointed questions about their safety and discuss studies that other doctors have refuted. Facebook and Twitter have allowed some of his posts to remain up with caution labels, and the companies have struggled to create rules to pull down posts that have nuance.

“He has been given new life by social media, which he exploits skillfully and ruthlessly to bring people into his thrall,” said Imran Ahmed, director of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which studies misinformation and hate speech. Its “Disinformation Dozen” report has been cited in congressional hearings and by the White House.

In an email, Dr. Mercola said it was “quite peculiar to me that I am named as the #1 superspreader of misinformation.” Some of his Facebook posts were only liked by hundreds of people, he said, so he didn’t understand “how the relatively small number of shares could possibly cause such calamity to Biden’s multibillion dollar vaccination campaign.”

The efforts against him are political, Dr. Mercola added, and he accused the White House of “illegal censorship by colluding with social media companies.”

He did not address whether his coronavirus claims were factual. “I am the lead author of a peer reviewed publication regarding vitamin D and the risk of Covid-19 and I have every right to inform the public by sharing my medical research,” he said. He did not identify the publication, and The Times was unable to verify his claim.

The Coronavirus Outbreak ›

Latest Updates

Updated

July 24, 2021, 11:34 a.m. ET26 minutes ago

26 minutes ago

A native of Chicago, Dr. Mercola started a small private practice in 1985 in Schaumburg, Ill. In the 1990s, he began shifting to natural health medicine and opened his main website, Mercola.com, to share his treatments, cures and advice. The site urges people to “take control of your health.”

In 2003, he published a book, “The No-Grain Diet,” which became a New York Times best seller. He has since published books almost yearly. In 2015, he moved to Florida.

As his popularity grew, Dr. Mercola began a cycle. It starts with making unproven and sometimes far-fetched health claims, such as that spring mattresses amplify harmful radiation, and then selling products online — from vitamin supplements to organic yogurt — that he promotes as alternative treatments.

To buttress the operation, he set up companies like Mercola.com Health Resources and Mercola Consulting Services. These entities have offices in Florida and the Philippines with teams of employees. Using this infrastructure, Dr. Mercola has seized on news moments to rapidly publish blog posts, newsletters and videos in nearly a dozen languages to a network of websites and social media.

Image

The Mercola headquarters in Cape Coral, Fla.

The Mercola headquarters in Cape Coral, Fla.Credit…Mercola

His audience is substantial. Dr. Mercola’s official English-language Facebook page has over 1.7 million followers, while his Spanish-language page has 1 million followers. The Times also found 17 other Facebook pages that appeared to be run by him or were closely connected to his businesses. On Twitter, he has nearly 300,000 followers, plus nearly 400,000 on YouTube.

Dr. Mercola has a keen understanding of what makes something go viral online, said two former employees, who declined to be identified because they had signed nondisclosure agreements. He routinely does A/B testing, they said, in which many versions of the same content are published to see what spreads fastest online.

Understand the State of Vaccine Mandates in the U.S.

In his email, Dr. Mercola said, “Translation and a variety of media positions are standard for most content oriented websites.”

Facebook said it has labeled many of Dr. Mercola’s posts as false, banned advertising on his main page and removed some of his pages after they violated its policies. Twitter said it has also taken down some of Dr. Mercola’s posts and labeled others. YouTube said Dr. Mercola was not part of a program from which he can make money from ads on his videos.

In 2012, Dr. Mercola began writing about the virtues of tanning beds. He argued that they reduced the chances of getting cancer, while also selling tanning beds with names like Vitality and D-lite for $1,200 to $4,000 each. Many of the articles were based on discredited studies.

The Federal Trade Commission brought false-advertising claims against Dr. Mercola in 2017 based on the health claims about tanning beds. He settled and sent $2.95 million in refunds to customers who bought the tanning beds.

The Food and Drug Administration has also issued warning letters to Dr. Mercola for selling unapproved health products in 2005, 2006 and 2011 and has fined him millions of dollars.

Many of Dr. Mercola’s claims have been amplified by other vaccine skeptics, including Ms. Elizabeth. She worked for Mercola.com from 2009 to 2011, according to her LinkedIn page.

But while Ms. Elizabeth and others are overtly anti-vaccine, Dr. Mercola has appeared more approachable because he takes less radical positions than his peers, Ms. Koltai said. “He takes away from the idea that an anti-vaccination activist is a fringe person,” she said.

In an email, Ms. Elizabeth said she was “shocked to have been targeted as one of the 12” in the “Disinformation Dozen” and called it a “witch hunt.”

When the coronavirus hit last year, Dr. Mercola jumped on the news, with posts questioning the origins of the disease. In December, he used a study that examined mask-wearing by doctors to argue that masks did not stop the spread of the virus.

He also began promoting vitamin supplements as a way to ward off the coronavirus. In a warning letter on Feb. 18, the F.D.A. said Dr. Mercola had “misleadingly represented” what were “unapproved and misbranded products” on Mercola.com as established Covid-19 treatments.

In May, Dr. Mercola took down many of his own Facebook posts to evade the social network’s crackdown on anti-vaccine content. Facebook also recently removed his Feb. 9 article.

But Dr. Mercola has continued to raise vaccine questions. In a Facebook post on Friday, he used another study to mull how useful the Pfizer vaccine was against Covid-19 variants. One headline in the post said the vaccine was only 39 percent effective, but it did not cite another statistic from the study that said the vaccine was 91 percent effective against serious illness.

“Is this possible? We were told 95 percent effectiveness,” he wrote.

Within a few hours, the post had been shared more than 220 times." https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/24/technology/joseph-mercola-coronavirus-misinformation-online.html

3 Likes

Zhou Bai Den did say, or was it one of his minions who can actually talk, that the regime would be bearing down on these dreadful antivaxxxer folks.

Why, golly gee, it was in the same “newspaper”.

1 Like

The astroturfing started a long time ago

"Consumer and social justice groups are asking the FDA and FTC to bring enforcement actions against Joseph Mercola, D.O., and his companies (collectively, the “Mercola Group”) for false, misleading, and deceptive claims that his products will treat, cure, or prevent COVID-19 infections.

In letters sent to the two agencies (FDA here and FTC here), dated July 21st, the Center For Science in the Public Interest, Justice Catalyst, and the People’s Parity Project charge the Mercola Group with capitalizing on the coronavirus. Their deceptive marketing claims and “medical” advice, these organizations say, pose a clear danger to the public…"

Link: Consumer groups urge feds to act against Mercola and his false COVID-19 claims | Science-Based Medicine

The first letter by the concerned ornery folksy “consumer” folk on the hill reads like a lawyer’s letter touched up by vampires. Contains much innuendo and hype though.
There’s a lot of armoury arraigned against Dr Mercola. He can afford to defend himself in the courts (and I think may be trimming down any slack in preparattion), but the coordinated assault by the GICS is a calculated attempted to take down one of their biggest and most effective opponents. With so much at stake they won’t be counting the cost, and they get media demonisation like the NYT hitpiece (posted by G) as a free bonus.

1 Like

This is just crap:

“He did not address whether his coronavirus claims were factual. “I am the lead author of a peer reviewed publication regarding vitamin D and the risk of Covid-19 and I have every right to inform the public by sharing my medical research,” he said. He did not identify the publication, and The Times was unable to verify his claim.”

Well I was able to verify his claim as quickly as I could type “Mercola Viamin D” into Pubmed.

Evidence Regarding Vitamin D and Risk of COVID-19 and Its Severity

The great Times is casting deceiptful aspersions.

See how the theme of the cunning cartoon villain is passed around by his critics:

“He has been given new life by social media, which he exploits skillfully and ruthlessly to bring people into his thrall,” said Imran Ahmed, director of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which studies misinformation and hate speech.
(Make that “which studies people with a reach questioning the corporate-medical narrative and smears them”, and “which regards all counter-narrative as hate speech”)

“An internet-savvy entrepreneur who employs dozens,…”

“The entire effort traced back to one person: Joseph Mercola.”

This refers to articles by …Joseph Mercola. No tracing required.

"Instead, the article claimed, the shots “alter your genetic coding, turning you into a viral protein factory that has no off-switch.”
Its assertions were easily disprovable. No matter. "

So easy we don’t think we need to actually disprove them.

I’m being misleading by singling out instances - the whole NYT story is crap. But they mean business for sure.

3 Likes

“Dr. Mercola has a keen understanding of what makes something go viral online, said two former employees, who declined to be identified because they had signed nondisclosure agreements. He routinely does A/B testing, they said, in which many versions of the same content are published to see what spreads fastest online.”

Every business does that if they know what they’re doing. Sheesh. They’re trying to make standard practice look nefarious.

2 Likes

I get Joe’s mailouts regularly. This sewage from the New York CesspitTimes is standard hit-piece rubbish, up to its oxters in lies and deceits. But arguing with it isn’t what we should do. That’s the idea: to use up dissidents’ energy by flying flocks of kites to get us chasing after them as they wild-goose away from our grasp.

Instead, just mark it down as the familiar shite we’re so used to, scorn it to extinction, and flush it. Take no further notice. To continue the scatology one step further, I’d say that the NYCT isn’t even fit for the likes of Joe to use as loo fodder. He’d be in danger of contamination from touching such a foul collection of lies and distortions.

I wonder whether he does make lots of money from his alternative-medicine products, though. That always has to give you pause - when true… There’s no need to profit excessively from it. The non-allopathic traditions of medicine are freely available for those who want to look. They’ve never been for-profit particularly, mostly just asking reasonable rewards to pay the practitioners’ way. Greed-commercialisation, otoh, always taints everything it touches. Reasonable fund-seeking to finance your non-profit public service work is one thing; getting aboard the commercialisation-for-greed band-waggon, as the Big Pharma criminals do, is something inherently more pollutive of everything it touches. Still, those claims about Joe are only NYCT hit-piece shite (on behalf of the huge greed-commercial interests whose bribes the whores actually accept, usually as ‘advertising revenue’), so: worth a bit of digging, perhaps; but no need to take them too seriously. Think of it as whores’ projections, most probably.

1 Like

Exactly! Picking up on an earlier post which mentions that the NYT was unable to verify X: this is a variation on the already very tatty trope “no evidence has been found to suggest Y”. In both cases this is because no one did any actual research. Cutting and pasting from press releases is already being farmed out to algorithms, so the surviving paid liars are certainly not going to draw attention to themselves by doing any journalism.

2 Likes

Those working in the alternative/complimentary field should always make their prime concern the availability of their treatments…I’d like to see far more of them dedicated to having their therapies accepted by the mainstream and integrated into public health care systems…

That is standard practice!