On an earlier thread, which I’ve lost, typically, there was some discussion of whether Dr Robert Malone is controlled opposition and/or whether his use of “mass formation psychosis” was helpful or not.
I offer this recent piece from his Substack
On an earlier thread, which I’ve lost, typically, there was some discussion of whether Dr Robert Malone is controlled opposition and/or whether his use of “mass formation psychosis” was helpful or not.
I offer this recent piece from his Substack
Still questions. Why does he insist that the vaccines are not ‘completely safe’? (What is he hinting at here?) Why is he still harping on about the threat of ‘Omicron’? Does he really believe children are vectors of this disease? Why does he repeat his warnings about vaccine damage to children in the context of the effect on parents’ lives? (This is manipulative however good the intention)
He refers to Mass Formation thankfully without the P word (but he has already done the damage there). He brags about conferring with van den Bossche and Desmet (‘in Europe’) and repeats Bossche’s (another current Covid vaccine developer along with RM himself) nonsense about ‘leaky vaccines’.
I could bang on about our scepticism concerning the existence and operation of viruses - since the entire charade ultimately depends on this false belief system (think ‘unproved’ if you prefer) for its maintenance and its future uses - but I’ll just say we did cringe every time he mentioned the virus/infection falsehood (which was lots).
Unlike RM, RFK spoke brilliantly from the heart without notes. Its funny how his speech impediment doesn’t matter after a little while - not sure if that’s because he gets on top of it or we do. His speech really is worth listening to/watching.
btw. Was that your cat?
(oops reply was meant to both)
I agree he does exude integrity.
Peter McCullough has also discussed mass psychosis.
He and Malone have been subjected to unprecedented levels of flak from colleagues, underpinned by levels of apparent ‘igorance’ that are not credible. Not surpising they seek such explanations - the real horror for them being unimaginable, ie that their colleagues are sociopathic careerists willing to rent out their positions and suppress their consciences on the possible public cost.
Omicron is proving slow to subside; datawise, death rates in US equate to significantly higher than their pandemic average - as big a big thing there as ever. The number of ‘cases’ outweighing its substantially lower risk, to add up to more deaths.
Vaccines provide false comfort - likely responsible for the spread of Omicron.
He might still partly believe in the vaccine for adults, but Malone’s platform would vanish overnight if he came out and said what many of his supporters really think. His insights are useful to people arguing medical cases.
I think the art is to use what’s valuable and not go to war on each other on the basis of purity, especially when it comes to such useful figures as Malone.
Cheers