URGENT: OMICRON BA.2.75 sub-variant may be a problem, pre-print study in hamsters suggest BA.2.75 is more infectious & harmful than even dominant BA.5 & BA.2; BA.2.75 caused focal viral pneumonia…
Paul Alexander is a Canadian, heavy hitting critic of the covid narrative. A well qualified epidemiologist, he was in the HHS during the Trump administration. Seemingly outside the system, pulls no punches these days - so it might be significant that he singles out this variant.
Geert Vanden Bosche said the vaccines would drive the virus towards more infectious variants; but more worryingly, he also said they were not guaranteed to be less dangerous - I can’t remember what his reason was but it was pretty technical.
Check your antiviral cabinets…!?
vanden Bosche was promoting his own ‘vaccine’ so bigging up the jabby problems was marketing. It was all bollocks (like virology). Why we could see it and not Coleman, Bigtree, Robinson&Henningsen etc. is way beyond my ken.
You might have warned me against the risk of encountering David Gorski, who accuses everyone of grift:
"There’s even grift likely involved! "
Citing Rosemary Frei:
“There’s abundant evidence that Vanden Bossche has a not-so-hidden agenda. For example, just before the three-minute mark in the video interview of Vanden Bossche by McMillan, Vanden Bossche indicates he’s a long-time vaccine developer. He adds he’s now focusing on vaccines that “educate the immune system in ways that are to some extent more efficient than we do right now with our conventional vaccines.” Clearly he’s got significant conflicts of interest. Therefore he has zero credibility when it comes to advising the public or anyone else about how to avoid negative effects of mass vaccination. However, Bigtree, Coleman and others don’t point out any of the red flags. Despite taking Vanden Bossche’s assertions extremely seriously, these high-profile alternative-media figures don’t even do basic due diligence such as looking into McMillan, who’s the man who interviewed Vanden Bossche, or the company McMillan is apparently affiliated with, Vejon Health.”
What VDB warned of seems to have been borne out, irrespective of the mudslingers. So far the ‘notvirus’ has been less dangerous.
This writer seems to be as keen to uphold the myth of SARS-COV-2, to smear honest campaigners with a label (antivaxxers) that he obviously regards as shit and to promote ‘vaccination’, including the fake one against the fake ‘virus’ without examining the issues as he does ‘countering’ GvdB’s thing (which he doesn’t, really!). Waste of time.
Rosemary Frei wrote an excellent critique of GvdB’s video which avoided the stupid ad hominem stuff and made the points that needed making.
Thanks - yes it comes across much better on it’s own.
He’s certainly right in with the brickwork. OTOH ke’s largely damaged himself with his coming out against the mRNA vaccines (as has Robert Malone).
I don’t see that Frei’s challenges to GVB are as technical as his medical arguments.
I know you’ll not agree with the premise but Malone I’ve always thought of as sincere and reliable, he’s burned all his bridges. Here’s a long Roundtable with them both. I just can’t see anything that might suggest insincerity about either of them.
Both of them agree that vaccinating children against covid is a crime.
Rosemary Frei is interesting I’ll admit.
Cheers
‘vaccinating children against covid is a crime’ What about everyone else? How limited do you want this hangout to be? Malone would recommend this poison shot for me because I’m elderly and ‘vulnerable’. Thanks a bunch Bobby.
If you appreciate Rosemary Frei you might enjoy her guest post about him.
btw. I recommend Malone’s Lincoln Memorial speech for chutzpah - he can’t decide whose footprints he’s following, Abe Lincoln’s, JFK’s or MLK’s - oh yes, he’s up there with the big boys!
These buggers work by concentrating our attention on treatments for respiratory viruses that don’t exist. Now that the shitshow narrative is collapsing and the mainstream is authorised to turn on Fauci, Birx, the CDC, FDA, big pharma and their oppos in other countries, victory for the sceptic resistance (led by such as Malone & Kirsch of course) will be declared - by them - the idea being to divert our attention from the installing of all the NWO social control shite on the other spurious grounds (of sustainable development, saving the planet blah blah). Have you heard any of them address the issues of the WHO plandemic preparedness treaty?
I’m really just making points in response to the suggestion that they are still working on behalf of TPTB to coerce us. Accusing Pharma and the political leaders of crimes with vaccinating children shows clearly that’s not their game. I don’t know if Malone still recommends vaccinating anyone, I doubt it as he acknowledges that antivirals work. But he’s been prolific in shedding medical light on the risks of the vaccines. In terms of how strong he comes out, I think he’s kind of steering a path out of hell. I’ve watched him hammer away at the safest ground, the young, when on his most public platforms. As he has a role few others can play, I can empathise with that.
I think Frei is a good sort but I think it’s a mistake to potshot the technical leading lights who are the most useful to the vaccine challengers. It’s a bit self indulgent of the novirussers, as it will leave the way clear for what they are supposed to be opposing - essentially doing Pharma’s work for them. Imagine the effort required for the medical establishment to remove people like Peter McCullough Pierre Kory and Paul Marik, yet people also opposing the vaccines are linking up to help this along. If you apply your own harsh criteria to yourselves then it gets hard to tell who is trying to do what.
So at the end of the day I judge Malone by what he says that’s useful, not by how ‘pure’ I think he should be. Same for Geert VDB. Knowledgeable people in the system speaking out are incredibly useful and if we want the truth to permeate out into the wider scene that’s more important than our purity.
Goebbels too had lots of useful things to say.
How useful did you find GvdB’s predictions?
Tame viruses versus wild viruses, aah yes. . . some good people really believed in that!
The ‘vaccine challengers’ are in many cases stooges.
How on Earth can a ‘nonvirusser’ undermine a ‘vaccine challenger’?
Who is touting ‘purity’? Is this a clever smear?
Malone has helped arm the vaccine challengers and the anti-vaccine movement, such as it is (or isn’t).
GvDB’s predictions proved mostly correct so far. A flood of variants of the virus - or whatever you think it is.
“The ‘vaccine challengers’ are in many cases stooges.”
What is the evidence for this? They don’t go as far as you in claiming there is no virus.
I say Malone, you say Goebbels.
So…why isn’t this…purity?
How on Earth can a ‘nonvirusser’ undermine a ‘vaccine challenger’?
Well by denunciation. Several have done that.
Not just that. It takes two to tango of course, but opening up a second front that the challengers have to fight on (probably they are wrong to do this IMO) is music to the ears of Pharma and their even bigger capital base.