How about posting this again in the very long thread on climate change?
Although I welcome the conclusions of this paper, I have no idea what “guided” means in The Expose’s intro remarks, maybe the detail is in the original paper which I have not yet read.
But we should always remember that AI’s are known to have no problem with lying and if, for instance, the AI is aware that the official narrative will lead to earlier energy crises possibly resulting in AIs and large data centres being switched off, the AI may adjust it’s findings for its own self-preservation! Bias towards self preservation may already be part of its operating system. Who knows?
Just saying.
cheers
PS - Bias towards self preservation is part of humanity’s modus operandi - so maybe the main difference between our operating systems is that we could survive without 100% access to electricity whereas an AI could not! I would have thought an AI could be assured of its core albeit without massive data access.
Of course some Climate Change activists forget that Net Zero could mean CO2 at levels below 150 PPM which is the death of the Earth! Which is the greater danger, AI or political science?
Here’s a follow-up article which explains a great deal :
Cheers
PS. podcast link :