Since we’re still in September, and the 20th anniversary, here’s a short film about how the World Trade Center towers were built…
After being hit by two commercial airliners in the very upper storeys, both WTC1 and WTC2 completely collapsed in freefall in 10 seconds flat.
I make no further comment, except to say that it’s directly connected to all the covid stuff that’s going on at the moment.
Loving the homage to the opening scenes of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Karen, thanks for reminding me about the Space Odyssey music. It was running through my head but I couldn’t quite identify it.
By way of context, in a previous life I was an engineering draughtsman, and I was involved in some of the biggest buildings that were going up in London during the 1980s and 1990s. Quite ironic, really, since I’ve always hated heights.
Dr Judy Wood has surfaced again, just recently on the Jason Liosatos podcast.
I know, when it comes to all things 9/11, that many here will be familiar with Dr Judy Wood, and how contentious her views are (for the record she holds a number of professorships in engineering sciences). I’ve always found her account of 9/11 to be one of the most engaging.
It will probably be a long time, if ever, that we find out what really happened on that day.
Anyhows, this is a long interview. It’s worth a listen if you’re interested in all this stuff…
Some interesting material in that vid, Rob. Can’t say it’s enough to make me re-order my odds guesstimates about which story is likeliest to be true; but still some interesting stuff to consider.
Some of her statements do go against the on-record descriptions of first-responders who were actually there, and who are recounting their direct personal observations - like molten steel running down the floor in the basement of one of the buildings; and other direct personal testimonies of people who were actually there on the day - which Judy wasn’t.
Something made a lot of heat on that day. It wasn’t all low temperature ‘dustification’. And she mentioned the red/grey chips once, but said no more to explain them, though clearly they were unexploded nanothermite residue, which did explode under the hands of the Harrit-led investigation team when heated.
As she says: direct observation of the physical evidence is crucial.
One thing does remain clear, though: whoever amongst the dissidents has the right explanation, the official fairy tale of 19 jihadis wreaking all that havoc at WTC with just two of four planes is rubbish.
Whether there was some still unannounced secret technology at work or not - and I doubt the Bondian thesis that small cliques of ultra-rich people can develop entire new technologies and keep them completely secret from the world, even when making precise use of them, as Judy supposes - even so, the Bollyn investigation, which points to zionistani and US ‘elite’ plotters being the real perps., continues to persuade. Add in Kevin Ryan’s careful investigations, summarised in his book ‘Another Nineteen’, to give further weight to Chris Bollyn’s account, and that continues to be the most persuasive story to my judgement - whatever technical means they may or may not have used.
I don’t know whether Judy has ever put on hard hat and overalls and actually gone amongst demolished buildings, but I have, extensively. And anyone who has knows very well about the ubiquity of all grades of dust, from coarse particles to fine particulate mists in such places, any time the weather’s dry. None of it created by anything but the most mundane and ordinary processes, with which all building-trades people are familiar. Dust proves nothing, unless it’s analysed closely, as the Harrit team did. And they found not just one but several mutually-supportive signatures of classic controlled demolition.
Rhis, I agree with you, and probably many others do, in that we don’t know with any certainty about what happened on that day. I think what we might all agree upon is that ‘something unusual’ happened.
Do tell what your experience is of demolished buildings.
The only experience I have is when they are being built.
Looking back, I’m a bit at a loss to know why I seem to have had so much experience of being around masonry demolition. Just remember quite a few jobs where that was involved to some degree, usually removing old buildings to clear for new build. I just seem to have had an unusual amount of time amongst the debris of masonry removal, and it sticks in my mind how invariably dusty it is.
And this was buildings where the main masonry component was stone or brick, unlike the WTC, where it was mostly pulverised concrete. There’s no question, though, that orthodox, admitted controlled demolitions create great clouds of all grades of dust, from the coarsest to the finest. Simply look at all the videos. The dust cloud is ubiquitous. You don’t have to invoke an unknown technology to account for it. It was all over Manhattan and adjacent waters at the time of the demolitions, lying inches thick until cleared. That’s where the masonry component of the buildings went. The steel, conveniently pre-cut into handy lengths, some of them actually displaying the diagonal incendiary cuts familiar to CD riggers, went with very suspicious promptness by a constant convoy of conveniently-ready dump trucks to the Fresh Kills landfill site, and from thence to China, to be recycled. No great mystery that I can see.
I’ve followed the free-energy/zero-point energy enthusiasts in their home on the margins for some years, because there is indeed some basic physics which suggests that such ideas may have a basis in reality, though no-one seems to have any ideas about how to tap it, apart from a small handful of machines which do seem to have demonstrated rather modest, if inexplicable, over-unity energy anomalies. Never anything more than a fraction above what the conventional energy conservation theory would predict, though.
The point is that the people who inhabit that byway of physics always seem to have a high degree of eccentricity - as you would - and JW’s obsession with a completely unexplained - and unknown outside the free-energy community - ‘new technology’ seems very much of their ilk. One of the very few books which has so irritated me that I was tempted to do a classic book-burning on it was a work by one of the NASA astronauts, called ‘Miracle In The Void’, typical of so many of the unsupported speculative assertions made by the ‘free energy’ people. I regard them as one of the millenarian cults of our time, drunk on sci-fi imaginings. Haven’t looked into JW’s book, but I expect I’d get a whiff of the same aroma if I did.
I don’t know quite how ‘free energy’ and ‘directed energy weapons’ came to over-complicate the truth-finding work of the 11/9 truth-seekers community. I have no guess whether JW believes her stuff, or is simply a disinformation plant. In any case, I’ve always found it irrelevant, since much of what she says actually contradicts eye-witness-on-the-day accounts of what people saw, and the building collapses are, I estimate, accounted for completely by the - conventional - controlled demolition hypothesis.