Here’s the next one.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/mnexspike
They aren’t even hiding it (not that they ever did…)
2 Likes
From the FDA Approval letter
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
“We did not refer your application to the Vaccines and Related Biological Product
Advisory Committee because our review of information submitted in your BLA, including
the clinical study design and trial results, did not raise concerns or controversial issues
that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion”
You can put in whatever you see fit, we trust you 
1 Like
From the ever noncritical (V)Axios
Zoom in:
In a Phase 3 trial of approximately 11,400 participants, the new vaccine showed 9.3% higher relative efficacy compared to Moderna’s original vaccine Spikevax in people 12 and older, and a 13.5% higher efficacy in those 65 and older.
https://www.axios.com/2025/05/31/fda-approves-moderna-mnexspike-covid-19-vaccine
Isn’t this the original?
"In this Phase 2/3 study, 3,732 adolescent participants ages 12 to less than 18 years were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to two 100 µg doses of mRNA-1273 or placebo. The primary endpoint of non-inferior immunogenicity versus the Phase 3 adult study comparator group was met. "
“After two doses, no cases of COVID-19 were observed in the vaccine group using the case definition from the adult Phase 3 COVE study, compared to 4 cases in the placebo group, resulting in a vaccine efficacy of 100% starting 14 days after the second dose.”
What does it mean to claim that the new vaccine is 109.3% effective? That you get the side effects when you book the vaccine ? (Saves you a trip I guess 
). Is everything 9% more, including the amount of bacterial DNA contamination? We need to be told…
The real story is that there is NO regulation. It’s all down to a cosy buddy trust, and the only care on show is that the vaccine show continues.
1 Like