What’s your take on Yeadon? Interested to hear your views.
My take when judging a commentator on Coroni, for what it’s worth is this.
1 Does he/she know their shit
2 Who do they work for
3 Does their job depend on subsidies, grants, or endowments
4 What do they gain by expressing their views
5 Conversly, what could they loose by speaking out
6 (A late addition). Do the look and sound honest, and does their take make common sense
Yeadon scores 10/10 on every point.
Point 1. He knows his shit. I don’t think anyone (even Kill Gates) would dispute that
Point 2. He made himself a good wedge and now is retired so works for no one (except maybe the wife!)
Point 3. See point 2
Point 4. For a very private guy who has never spoken in the media before now see Points 2 and 3
Point 5. He has everything to loose. His Wikidecivia page, will no no doubt be tailored to show him as a charlatan. He will loose friends and has already done so. He will be castigated by the lamestream.
Point 6. Judge for yourself.
Mike Yeadon. Respect! Nuff said
3 Likes
Yes, don’t disagree at all with your ‘litmus tests’ and have applied them all myself (and came to the same conclusion), but was just curious as to why now? This is, after all, a man that has profited very nicely working for Pfizer, which isn’t exactly known for its integrity.
I do remember in one of his interviews, he was explaining his attitude towards vaccination in general and although some might not have given it much attention, his view was, I thought quite telling. He said that vaccination just stopped you getting something that you probably would have conquered anyway. Almost like, vaccination just stopped all the faff! That’s not the mainstream view. Is it then, just a jab/technology/politics too far? If so, then he should be given even more credence given his past ‘support’ for vaccination/Pfizer
2 Likes
Mike - yes indeed, a very convincing truth-teller - stands about where I stand on vaccines (and on the covid quaxines): Genuine, fully-tested vaccines seem to be cautiously useful, in a few instances, in limited applications. I would go further, though I suspect Mike as he’s now thinking might agree here too: Anyone who wants can secure healthy lives for themselves and - especially - for their children and other dependents without ever needing to have any use of vaccines AT ALL, provided one embraces the commonsense public-health provisions which had all but banished the traditional scourge illnesses BEFORE vaccines were suddenly unleashed en masse on the world, in the early 20th Century: the Salkist delusion. (Pioneer maverick doctors were curing polio with mega-dose vitamin C, and even helping previously polio-damaged people to recover their full health in the '40s, before the vaccine craze really got going. See Andrew Saul’s 'Doctoryourself.com website for chapter and verse.)
Since then, vaccination has been cried up into a Holy Cow of horribly-skewed, currently-orthodox Western medical theory, and, of course, a most unholy hypercash cow of the BPh criminals.
Personally, I’ve never taken vaccines, nor ever given them to children, dogs, etc. under my care. And it’s become an unmistakable truth by now that such youngsters brought up entirely without stabs are palpably healthier and more vigorous then those subjected to the monstrous regime of massive injection-schedules that have been foisted on us by the crooks and their bought pols and ‘regulators’. An entire populace of chronically under-par children and adults has resulted from that lunacy. It needs scrapping, more or less in toto.
2 Likes
Interesting that you should mention dogs, Rhys. It’s fairly uncontroversial that beyond the puppy shots, it’s not necessary to have the annual boosters because, as with humans, to the extent they do work, they appear to be effective for about thirteen to fifteen years.
Bar the puppy shots (given by the breeder) our five-year old Border terrier has never been vaccinated, nor given anything to protect against fleas, tics, worms etc and he’s still got his balls. Reckless? Well, the only time he has had fleas and worms was when the vet convinced us that he needed a course of antibiotics for a pulled nail/cut pad. No need to highlight the undoubted connection. Outside of that, he’s out in the woods everyday and fit as a fiddle. Should point out that we buy the best food we can afford; whole prey, complete, 80% meat and grain-free. I would go raw, but cannot seem to get there. As with humans and not surprisingly, poor diet and excessive and/or unnecessary medical intervention seems to create and perpetuate many problems.
2 Likes
I’d echo this with pet cats. We spent a small fortune on our first one, Mr Claws Kinski, none of which prevented him disappearing one night during fireworks season. So it goes.
The next two, the second of whom is still with us, very seldom went to the vet apart from the cat flu jab as a kitten.
Aged about 15 months he came home bleeding from the hind quarters, a dog or a fox nearly got him, and the vet prescribed some chemical or other. I forget the name but it made him way worse: he was incontinent and very weak. The bite wound was healing fine.
Chucked the meds away, made him comfortable for the night, and didn’t really expect him to see him alive the next morning. Still here though 11 years later.
We subsequently realised a side effect of the medicine was kidney damage.
1 Like
Ozzy vet. Ian Billinghurst is the man for sound, healthy feeding of dogs. ‘BARF’, he calls it: biologically-appropriate raw food! 
By which he means raw meat and bones, with some raw fruit and vegetables, as they’ll eat it. His best-seller ‘Give Your Dog A Bone’ spells it all out.
For a wider perspective on healthy living and healing treatments for cats and dogs, I’d recommend Juliette de Bairacli-Levy’s books.
1 Like
Yes, I know Barf well. Dr. Becker on YouTube very good too.
Be careful.
I too have shared this link, but now I’ve heard that it’s a fake channel.
1 Like
That might make sense.
I hadn’t previously followed the Telegram link as I already subscribe.
The channel linked above is not his.
MY has a Telegram channel jointly with Robin Monotti. I muted it some time back as the volume of posts is too high, and the automation tool they are using sends these out in large batches all at once.
Lots of the Telegram channels seem to do this and the You Must Read This strapline two dozen or more times a day gets wearing. An honourable exception, funnily enough, is Jennifer Arcuri.
Right now, for example, the badge on my Telegram app says 51 messages and I can pretty much guarantee only 1 will be worth a look.
1 Like