See just how desperate below.
That Robert Fico has some gumption, after what happened to him.
Meryl Nass posts this from 2024 Remember that Tedros visited Robert Fico, presumably to change his mind about the Pandemic Treaty and IHR amendments a couple of weeks before a very serious assassination attempt on Fico, which he barely survived—right before last year’s World Health Assembly votes!
[
Slovakian Prime Minister Fico shot multiple times several days after announcing his nation will not be signing the WHO treaty and amendments
Am I missing something? According to MSM it’s been passed earlier today, 20th May. Has it been passed or not?
Countries sign off on global pandemic treaty at annual WHO meeting in Geneva
Countries approved a landmark treaty on Tuesday that aims to avoid the mistakes of the COVID-19 pandemic in future global health crises.
The treaty’s formal approval at the annual meeting of the World Health Organization (WHO) came after some late-breaking tension on Monday, when Slovakia challenged the treaty’s adoption by calling for an early vote – and then abstained, along with Poland, Italy, and eight other countries.
But the treaty was ultimately approved with majority support and adopted by member states on Tuesday.
WHO member states had agreed last month on most of the treaty’s details, though they will continue negotiations on a few sticking points.
The agreement “will ensure countries work better, faster and more equitably together to prevent and respond to the next pandemic threat,” said WHO chief Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
The legally binding accord will require countries to take steps to prevent, prepare for, and respond to future pandemics, with the goal of making medical supplies such as vaccines more accessible across the globe.
It’s a bit complicated. The way the WHO uses ;‘consensus’ to avoid votes. The consensus seems to refer to bits and pieces with anything people wouldn’t vote for left out, for future extra-procedural wranglers to sneak in as if it were mere details.
Most of the time the consensus refers to vague statements to be interpreted when few are watching.