5 Filters

Media Lens on Martin Amis

To begin on a brief personal note, I was sorry to hear that Martin Amis had died a few days back, and to realise that most likely The Zone Of Interest will be his last work of fiction. (Just about readable but I couldn’t understand why a novelist of his stature chose the subject of concentration camp gore.)

His fiction was usually good, occasionally great (London Fields, The Pregnant Widow, Money) but his forays into editorialising were increasingly neolib sloganeering. Media Lens provide a much better appraisal than I ever could.

I’ll remember Amis fondly for his memoir Experience, which struck the right sort of balance between autohagiography (H/T the Wickedest Man In The World) and self-deprecation.

2 Likes

Cheers, K - yes, I had a great deal of time for Amis too - I’d add The Information to your list.

Naturally, his unhinged response to 9/11 was a huge disappointment - wish he’d kept his trap shut on that matter - - in the ML piece you link DE recalls this from Amis (though tweaked as a thought experiment with Corbyn/Jews):

‘What can we do to raise the price of them doing this? There’s a definite urge – don’t you have it? – to say, “The Muslim community will have to suffer until it gets its house in order.” What sort of suff­­er­­­ing? Not letting them travel. Deportation – further down the road. Curtailing of freedoms. Strip-searching people… Discriminatory stuff, until it hurts the whole community and they start getting tough with their children.’

That’s unforgivable.

On the back of 9/11 Amis remarked that we’d entered the era of ‘Horrorism’ - as though the preceding decades/centuries of carnage had been anything but horror upon horror upon horror.

I could never return to him after that - a great shame because he was an exceptionally gifted writer.

2 Likes

The notion that Muslim families don’t instil discipline was, and still is, a vile slander, but if you read Lionel Asbo it’s obvious that working-class people generally were a matter of distaste to Amis Fils and he had decided to stop hiding it. (If you haven’t: stay well away. Not even as amusing as one of those yeah but no but yeah caricatures on Little Britain.)

I think I still have a copy of The Information and remember it being fun.

I couldn’t understand why a novelist of his stature chose the subject of concentration camp gore.

It’s simply because all Zionist writers feel obliged to hype up the particular events of WW2 which will continue to conjure up sympathy and understanding for the poor Jews who have to kill and rob Palestinians for evermore because, well, because. (Look for the latest example from the Guardian’s Jonathan Freedland in all ‘good’ bookshops.) Here’s an extract from an interview with him published in Haaretz in 2019:

As Amis rolls another cigarette, I mention that I will have to ask him at some point about Israel – journalistic duty and all.

“Israel is a real theme in this book. It ends in Israel. And my first love was a Jewish girl. It was during the Six-Day War, and she would go off, having lost her virginity to me, to donate blood for Israel. And that – what are you going to do about that? – that is a bond.”

Amis has often declared himself to be a philosemite, which he attributes to several close relationships with people who, by chance, have been Jewish: that first love, his closest friend (the late Hitchens), his second wife, and his two daughters, whom, among their several nicknames he also sometimes calls “the Jews.”

Amis first visited Israel in 1986, and he visited a second time a year later, to speak at a conference at the University of Haifa about, and attended by, Saul Bellow, and organized by A.B. Yehoshua. He has since been to Israel many times. When I ask him about his thoughts on the changes he has observed in Israel since those first visits, Amis turns again to poetry.

“It’s a demonstration of that poem by Andrew Marvell about Oliver Cromwell [‘An Horatian Ode upon Cromwell’s Return from Ireland’]. He had just come back from slaughtering twenty percent of the Irish population in the middle of the 17th century: “Still keep thy sword erect; / Besides the force it has to fright / The spirits of the shady night, / The same arts that did gain / A pow’r, must it maintain.”

“Israel just had to become a tough guy.” He leans forward. “See me out?”

We walk side by side through the backyard, heading to the cottage where he was staying during the festival.

“I have an Israeli friend – a businessman, very right wing – I think he is basically a sweetie but he turned himself into a hothead. Israel just can’t afford to be a sweetie, it had to learn the art of violence. So it’s a shame. Saul used to say, Jewish manhood would have been dead without Israel. Zion followed from the Holocaust, so the only way they could be reborn was the reassertion of manhood. I was quite shocked when he said that. He said – ‘after the beating we had taken…’

He asks if I was born in Israel, and I nod.

“So you’re a sabra too. And you know what a sabra is? A prickly pear. So my friend, I think he is basically a sweetie, but he had made himself prickly. There’s no place for being sweet, especially not in the Middle East.”

1 Like

That puts it very well @AlanG

A film has been made ‘loosely based on the book’. The director is Jonathan Glazer who made Under The Skin (the one with Scarlet Cantactssen, based on Michel Faber’s fantastic book, not the one with Samantha Morton which I haven’t seen). While I’m hoping against hope that it is not a straight Suffering-Porn translation I think I will steer clear because WiCIApedia says he (Glazer) was “born into a Jewish family”.

Amazing how such a small percentage of the population wield such influence isn’t it…