Quite likely. But no one lives forever. My dad died aged 56, so Chomsky has certainly had a good innings.
1 Like
The longevity of anyone is not the issue. The issue is the cause of death (regardless of someone’s age at passing).
If he had valuable contributions to make to public discourse (e.g. Israel-Gaza), then it’s a tragedy (e.g. for Gazans) that he did not continue for another decade - perfectly possible in his pre-covid-jabs state of health.
One upside now, though, is that he is no longer fit to continue pushing covid propaganda. He himself must recognise that a plausible cause for his stroke is what anti-jabbers had been warning him all along. At least he will probably now keep his stupid poisonous mouth shut on the subject of covid.
I myself warned him that he could be put in the dock (even after his passing) for his contribution to the covid-propaganda crime against humanity.
He became, on covid, what Christopher Hitchens became on Iraq: an ostensible anti-establishment leftie who degenerated into a useful idiot and lackey for establishment power and propaganda.
3 Likes
And what exactly is the cause of death?
Dad had motor neurone disease. Mum said he choked to death. Caught her out, as he used to make similar noises with no issue.
Doctor said it was pneumonia. Who is going to argue with the expert? (He was a good doctor).
I agree with your post, but reality is that you reach an age and you just become vulnerable. You’re most likely correct that it was the shots, but…
I remember the extracts from emails that you posted here. Like so many on the “Left” (as Darren Allen’s SubStack elucidates) NC opted for Terror Derangement. It casts a pall over his lifetime’s achievements but he pulled many punches during that time. Not on Palestine, though.
I believe that he is alive, still, as at 14:10 UTC but the ‘cause’, when/if publicised, will be a compromise of some kind. 95 is not a bad score.
What caused all the strokes that people had before the covid vaccination? Unpopular take, I know, but I think you’re stretching here.
1 Like
My understanding is that strokes have increased substantially post covid-jab rollout.
You are right of course Jackie, though I would point out that this consideration was not recognized by those in another place (and indeed Oliver Kamm, who Rhis had happily goaded on social media) trying to attach Rhisiart’s stroke to his reported (was it certain?) covid status.
There are certainly some signs of an increase in strokes following the covid jabs; higher shortly afterwards. The number of US VAERS reports of stroke following covid shots have been 20 times those for other vaccines (along with many other conditions).
This big Norwegian study claimed to be negative:
" Conclusions:
We did not find increased risk of stroke during the first 28 days after an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine."
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040430
but this kind of misrepresents the data. The breakdowns given for different stroke types (and vaccine dose) suggest it’s at best a very near miss. Strangely they don’t give an overall figure. By the looks of it this would have reached significance. I’d say a 10% increase looks likely, despite the conclusion.
This study didn’t give a breakdown for age, so the data could be masking a bigger effect in the elderly.
This study from Georgia US found a strong increase in stroke in the first 3 weeks after the first dose.
Could be this is lower if taken over a longer time period. If time is a relevant factor then to assess the chances for an individual, you would need to know the individual’s vaccination status.
If it does boil down to about 10% overall then it would follow that about 1 in ten strokes (first ones, presumably) would be vaccine-related. Though his will be a very large number of people, it doesn’t allow us to make particular claims for individuals with any confidence.
But both sides play that game though!
I’d prefer to see more studies not just registry studies from Scandinavia - a place known for burying health risks from mobile phones in big data sets; the propaganda from such studies has lasted in the mainstream (including mainstream ‘science’) for at least two decades!
Cheers
Stretching? See if you can find the Bitchute video of Matt leTissier (an ex professional footballer), talking about collapses on the field. Then look at the stats for myocarditis on those below 50 (there are lots of reputable sources for these). IMHO, @rippon has been nothing but constrained and very careful with wording.
Hi @JackieL I’ll save you the trouble of the search. I didn’t realise that there were so many so here’s an easy watch.
I understand that a lot of people are saying that the mrna vaccine causes increased stroke risk. I’m not following it so can’t comment on that. My point is that ascribing a very elderly person’s stroke to the covid shot is a stretch because elderly people have always suffered from, and often die from, strokes.
Thanks, Pat. I’ve seen this argument around.
Perhaps I haven’t made my point about Chomsky sufficiently clear.
His position in essence is that people should not be allowed not to ascribe strokes to the covid jab.
He advocated mandatory covid shots. People objected on the grounds, ‘I choose not because alternative experts warn of the risk of adverse reactions (e.g. stroke).’
Of course one can only theorise a causal connection between his covid jabs and stroke.
But Chomsky’s position - completely unscientific and a complete betrayal of his professed principles of freedom, democracy, free-thinking and free-speech - was that the competing theory about covid-jabs (very dangerous) should be ditched and the idiots who believed that nonsense should be separated (apartheid) from mainstream society.
On covid (and vaccines generally), then, he was essentially a fascist.
Noted. Thanks.
His position on the Convid jabs bears out two things. First, those that were more likely to succumb to the lockdown, dangerous virus, social distancing scam were more likely to be from the upper echelons of society. Us hoy poloy from the working class had much better insight or were less easily ‘nudged’, or both.
Second is his attitude to Convid that reinforces my view held for some time, that Chomsky, for all his works, was nothing but a gatekeeper.
1 Like
Wikipedia (but seemingly no one else) are stating date of death as 18 June, and Jacobin magazine have published an obituary prematurely, which seems to have had a couple of paragraphs edited out, presumably jumping the gun.
It’s all a bit gross.
NCs stance on cronyvirus was unforgiveable. Plenty of other people joined the pile-in, for sure, but the complete suspension of critical thought from such a towering intellect was egregious.
1 Like
He did the same on 9/11 and JFK - game changing events which would have benefitted from his ability to see through the BS to the important elements.
For all that who can throw the first stone.
My thoughts go out to his relatives and friends, he certainly changed my outlook and I am sure thousands more.
cheers
PS latest from Brazil says Noam is still with us:
1 Like
Thanks all for these efforts.
That’s good, after all.
Might as well discuss him anyway…
Because of his position in MIT and his (for him) incongrous view on the covid vaccines, I’d been wondering if there was any Gates influence (BG seems, for example, to ‘own’ Washington), so I went looking and found a link to this discussion, which I can’t verify, but looks well-informed:
I’m not well up on Soros’s activities so I found it very useful, with its reluctantly released revelations - the best kind, I reckon 
ED
2 Likes
Yes, very useful. After some faffing about editing the URL from the Reddit post I located a mirror site showing the original article with embedded links (only a couple).
I’ve been largely ignorant of the role the Netherlands plays in the spook network of the EU . . .
…Continues in new post…