Worth a browse:
1 Like
A great read, thank you. And a link within your link is very informative on what they know (and what they donāt know) how any virus infects the hostā¦
āIt boggles my mind when there is some notion that by wearing a face covering you are actually doing a āserviceā to your neighbor and therefore everyone has to protect everyone by this. Actually, the opposite is true. You are now becoming an additional potential source of environmental contamination. You are now becoming a transmission risk; not only are you increasing your own risk but you are also increasing the risk to others.ā
1 Like
Oh this website is a mine of useful material. The set of sceptical questions to the scientific and political āauthoritiesā is an eye-opener too. Working as I always am under the conviction that I know of literally NO source of information on which Iād trust my life, I donāt know for sure how accurate are the assertions within the questions. But they seem to me to have a pretty sound ring of truth to them.
1 Like
This is a very useful site, seems to have stuff in depth.Thanks for posting, Rhis.
I found a set of graphs like this one yesterday (Line added), for Nottingham, Sheffield, Manchester, Liverpool, West Lancashire and a few others, that suggest lockdowns werenāt responsible for falling case numbers in these regions.
The site is fast-moving and rolling - if you see something you want, grab it at the time.
This piece could be crucial
Some highlights:
āPositive tests should be confirmed by testing a second sample and all positive tests should be reported along with the Cycle Threshold (Ct) obtained during the test to aid assessment of a patientās viral load.ā
Sage advice (I wish it was the SAGE advice).
Itās worth checking out the Gompertz curve:
āThe Gompertz-type plot seen above, which is formed by a single surge in activity, often followed by smaller minor upturns as the disease reaches new populations is typical of previous virus outbreaks that have been well documented, none of which have demonstrated a significant second wave even though control methods were used to prevent the spread of disease in each case.ā
The example given is MERS CoV in Saudi Arabia, then in Republic of Korea - not a second wave, just the virus moving somewhere where there is less immunity.
Iām not familiar with regional patterns in the UK but the same thing could be happening with London having been most infected initially, but more northern regions now ātaking offā - in a lesser fashion, having a degree of immunity? If so, not a second wave, and hardly compares to the first one anyway.
There is strong evidence in this paper that there was some immunity already in the population before Covid-19. So the UK pattern could be explained by consideration of existing and developing immunity.
Now offering ten to one odds that the 'panādemic is over, and will not return significantly to places where it has already reached herd immunity. Longer odds to follow, as confidence climbs. Despite the uncertainty of whoās information to trust, the picture gets steadily clearer, and itās becoming ever more certain that the panic was entirely inappropriate - and was, and is still being, weaponised by various axe-grinders who shouldnāt be trusted a fraction of an inch.
Itās also clear by now that NO vaccine is needed, as the novel pathogen appears to be following the traditional path of these Winter-illness events, and also a range of cheap, effective, safe and PROVEN prophylactics/cures are now well established too. I for one will not be having these new vaccines, any more than Iāve ever had the flu vaccines. It would be appropriate to advocate mass uprising and civil disturbance should any bunch of gic-owned pols, such as the Dansker government, tries to impose mandatory vaccination on us. It didnāt take long for them to retreat, once the Danes showed tham that they had the makings of an uprising on their hands! āThis is what democracy looks like!ā 