5 Filters

Left a comment on Saker, re his analysis published today

Under the article, published today, 8th February, 2022, titled ‘Revisiting Russia’s 5th and, especially, 6th column (Updated)’

Dmitry Orlov is also commenting, pretty dismissively of Ivashov’s statement, which Andrei is analysing. Dmitry doesn’t believe it’s significant at all; just another Western propaganda scam. My comment (currently awaiting inspection by Andrei’s in-house censors, of course; we’ll see whether it gets published):

SELFQUOTE:

Glad to see you so emphatic about objective facts, Andrei, as antidotes to ‘ideological drunken-ness’. I look forward to seeing you cure your own problem of precisely that sort, regarding the pseudopandemic, and the utter disaster of the West’s poison-stab not-vaccines, killing and maiming victims by the scores of thousands, with all adverse effects now over ten million. (Masses of objective facts available to justify that description, if you can just manage to bring yourself to look at them: VAERS in the US, the Yellow Card system in Britain, and Eudravigilance in the EU admit to these figures already; and admit also that they are certainly gross underestimates of the true totals. It’s also becoming widely admitted by now that the true Infection Fatality Rate of the covid pathogen - whatever it really is - is a small fraction of one percent, rather like a somewhat worse-than-usual Winter flu season; some ‘pandemic’!)

It would be a good idea too to treat your extensive analysis of Colonel-General Ivashov’s - alleged - statement (which he himself admits he didn’t write, just signed) as a striking instance of your own psychological projection.

As I’ve said before, I regard your blog as one of the best on the internet, and I check in to read the new posts every day. I also regard you as a man of strong honour and courage, who strives to do what he considers to be right. I’m confident that when you see that you’ve made an error, you have what it takes to admit that publicly. None of my comments above make any difference to my underlying admiration of what you do, and the excellence with which you do it.

But we ALL have our blind-spots/hot-buttons, which on occasion make fools of us ALL. I still cringe to think of some of my own past idiocies in this respect. I suggest, affably and with great respect, Andrei, that you examine your irrational acceptance of the pseudopandemic propaganda-storm. Putting it as Oliver Cromwell put it in his appeal to the Scots army before the battle of Dunbar: “I beseech ye, in the bowels of Christ, to think that ye may be mistaken!”

The Scots wouldn’t, and got the tar beaten out of them.

UNQUOTE

1 Like

More: This in reply to Richard Steven Hack’s comment on cognitive dissonance. I don’t expect this to be let through the censorship, any more than the original comment has been. Richard’s comment:

Richard Steven Hack on February 08, 2022 · at 9:02 pm EST/EDT

“I see only one explanation: I would call it “ideological drunkenness”. That is when a person’s ideological inclinations become so acute and the reality in the real world so unacceptable, that a person becomes literally “drunk” with his/her ideology. ” [This is Richard quoting Andrei. - RhG. Richard continues:]

The psychiatric term is “cognitive dissonance.”

I’ve been accusing all sorts of people of that for years now. It’s simply the condition where a person can’t believe the reality around him – so he doesn’t. Almost everyone is afflicted by that repeatedly in one’s life. As long as it’s just a personal problem, we don’t need to care. But when it becomes a major social movement – or worse, the entire society – that’s a real problem.

And my reply:

Exactly so, Richard! Ironically enough, I have tried to post a comment on this thread pointing out that Andrei - despite his truly outstanding excellence in the bulk of the work he gives to the world through this uniquely-useful blog - has just such an entrenched cognitive dissonance when it comes to recognising the ever-more-apparent reality about covid: that the whole thing is a huge scam; a ‘pseudopandemic’ as Iain Davis at UK Column News puts it.

Andrei proves that, like ALL of us, he has his blind-spots/hot-buttons, where admission of deeply disliked realities is simply denied, obdurately. One sharp irony around this matter is that so much of Andrei’s excellent analysis of Ivashov’s delusion also sounds like a classic case of the projection that Andrei is indulging in his denial of the reality of the pseudopandemic: What applies to Ivashov in his delusions about Russia and VVPutin applies also to Andrei in his complete swallowing of the ‘pandemic’ propaganda.

Unfortunately, as you say Richard, the response on this otherwise outstandingly-excellent blog to the truths about the covid scam is to censor anyone who speaks the ‘unacceptable’ realities. My previous comment hasn’t appeared, and I expect this one too to be obscured by Andrei’s team of censors. That’s a bit of a shame.

But it happens that, eventually, when a truth becomes established beyond any further possibility of paltering with it, people do eventually snap out of their cognitive dissonance, and accept the reality. I trust that this will happen in due course with Andrei and his in-house censors, regarding the scamdemic.

The unhideable reality of the utter disaster of the mass-killing, mass-maiming (but gigantically-profitable) poison-stabs masquerading as ‘vaccines’ is bringing that snap-out wake-up to ever more people. It’s to be hoped that the good folk running The Vineyard of the Saker will be joining them soon.

Successful ideologies survive by absorbing other truth claims. I can’t recall who coined the phrase articulation-rearticulation, possibly Stuart Hall (based on Antonio Gramsci iirc).

The first sense of this couplet is akin to how a truck and a trailer are yoked together, forming an articulated lorry. So, for example, a church might be built very near to a sacred yew tree, and derive some sacredness from this proximity. Witness too the Rudston monolith.

screen_shot_2017-06-22_at_08.58.41-1-448x280

The second part of the couplet, rearticulation, is where the ideology asserts certain truths that “belonged” to the older/less hegemonic set of ideas, as if these had been part of the hegemonic discourse all along.

I’d venture to say that Covid Narrative 2.0 fits this very well.

This process ensures that the ruling ideas of an era avoid too much friction (drunkenness/dissonance) and retain their dominance.

Summary

articulation-rearticulation